Comparison of Thermal Energy Lost through Exhaust Gases at Various Engine Speeds and Torque Loads for Diesel and Biodiesel Fuels

George Onyango Orido, G. Ngunjiri, M. Njue
{"title":"Comparison of Thermal Energy Lost through Exhaust Gases at Various Engine Speeds and Torque Loads for Diesel and Biodiesel Fuels","authors":"George Onyango Orido, G. Ngunjiri, M. Njue","doi":"10.9790/1684-1403070812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares amount of thermal energy lost through exhaust gases when an engine was operated on diesel and biodiesel. The study used a 4.7 hp (3.5 kW) single cylinder, four-stroke, multi-fuel engine which was operated on diesel and biodiesel fuels. Experiments were conducted for the two fuels at engine speeds of 1000, 1250 and 1500 rpm in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. The engine was tested for torque loads of 6 to 22 Nm at intervals of 4 Nm for speeds and fuels studied. The instrumentation of the engine was mainly equipped with data acquisition system and software for analysis. Exhaust gas mass flow rate and temperature measurements were used to determine lost thermal energy. Lost heat energy depended on the temperature of the waste heat gases and mass flow rate of exhaust gas. The energy lost in exhaust gases increased substantially with increased exhaust gas temperature. The results showed that more energy was lost through exhaust when the engine used biodiesel as compared to when it was fueled on diesel. Maximum heat loss through exhaust was 18.7% of fuel energy when the engine used biodiesel at a speed of 1500 rpm and a torque load of 14 Nm.","PeriodicalId":14565,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":"08-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-1403070812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper compares amount of thermal energy lost through exhaust gases when an engine was operated on diesel and biodiesel. The study used a 4.7 hp (3.5 kW) single cylinder, four-stroke, multi-fuel engine which was operated on diesel and biodiesel fuels. Experiments were conducted for the two fuels at engine speeds of 1000, 1250 and 1500 rpm in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. The engine was tested for torque loads of 6 to 22 Nm at intervals of 4 Nm for speeds and fuels studied. The instrumentation of the engine was mainly equipped with data acquisition system and software for analysis. Exhaust gas mass flow rate and temperature measurements were used to determine lost thermal energy. Lost heat energy depended on the temperature of the waste heat gases and mass flow rate of exhaust gas. The energy lost in exhaust gases increased substantially with increased exhaust gas temperature. The results showed that more energy was lost through exhaust when the engine used biodiesel as compared to when it was fueled on diesel. Maximum heat loss through exhaust was 18.7% of fuel energy when the engine used biodiesel at a speed of 1500 rpm and a torque load of 14 Nm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柴油和生物柴油燃料在不同发动机转速和扭矩负荷下通过废气损失的热能的比较
本文比较了以柴油和生物柴油为燃料的发动机通过废气损失的热能。这项研究使用了一台4.7马力(3.5千瓦)的单缸、四冲程、多燃料发动机,使用柴油和生物柴油燃料。根据制造商的建议,在1000、1250和1500 rpm的发动机转速下对这两种燃料进行了实验。发动机在6至22牛米的扭矩负荷下,以4牛米的间隔测试速度和燃料。发动机的仪表主要配备了数据采集系统和分析软件。废气质量流量和温度测量用于确定损失的热能。损失的热能取决于废热气体的温度和废气的质量流量。随着废气温度的升高,废气中损失的能量显著增加。结果表明,与使用柴油相比,使用生物柴油的发动机通过废气损失的能量更多。当发动机使用生物柴油,转速为1500转/分,扭矩负载为14牛米时,排气的最大热损失为燃料能量的18.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation OfSoil Condition And Flood Risk For Road Network Of Bangladesh—Compiled From Engineering Soil Maps And Digital Elevation Model Improved Limiting Criteria for Deflection in Multi-Story Buildings Subjected to Aerodynamic Load Study on Eco-Friendly Concrete Blocks without Cement and Curing Evaluation of High Performance Concrete by Partial Replacement of Cement with Silica Fume Natural Sand and Manufactured Sand Multi Response Optimization TIG welding parameters for dissimilar weld of MONEL 400 and AISI 304 using RSM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1