Keyvan Olazadeh, Nasrin Borumandnia, Mahin Habibi, Hamid Alavi Majd
{"title":"Using Longitudinal Variance Components Models to Assess Hyper-connectivity in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.","authors":"Keyvan Olazadeh, Nasrin Borumandnia, Mahin Habibi, Hamid Alavi Majd","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2022.3796.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of death globally and one of the most important diseases indicated by the World Health Organization (WHO). Several studies have concluded that brain damage can dramatically increase functional connectivity (FC) in the brain. The effects of this hyper-connectivity are not yet fully understood and are being studied by neuroscientists. Accordingly, this study identifies areas of the brain where, after brain injury, an acute increase in FC in such areas is observed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data used in this study were downloaded from the accessible open functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) site. The data included fMRI of 14 patients with severe TBI and 12 healthy individuals. The longitudinal model of variance components investigated the difference between FC in the baseline effect and the longitudinal trend between the TBI and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After fitting the longitudinal model of variance components, no difference was observed between the FC of the two groups due to the baseline effect. However, in the longitudinal trend of FC, there was a statistically significant difference between the three pairs of cerebellum left, cerebellum right, superior frontal gyrus left, superior frontal gyrus right, thalamus left, and thalamus right in the TBI group compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that FC was sharply increased in 3 pairs of areas in people with TBI. This hyper-connectivity can affect individuals' cognitive functions, including motor and sensory functions. The exact extent of this effect is unclear and requires further investigation by neuroscientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":8945,"journal":{"name":"BioTechniques","volume":"60 1 1","pages":"509-518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioTechniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.3796.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of death globally and one of the most important diseases indicated by the World Health Organization (WHO). Several studies have concluded that brain damage can dramatically increase functional connectivity (FC) in the brain. The effects of this hyper-connectivity are not yet fully understood and are being studied by neuroscientists. Accordingly, this study identifies areas of the brain where, after brain injury, an acute increase in FC in such areas is observed.
Methods: The data used in this study were downloaded from the accessible open functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) site. The data included fMRI of 14 patients with severe TBI and 12 healthy individuals. The longitudinal model of variance components investigated the difference between FC in the baseline effect and the longitudinal trend between the TBI and control groups.
Results: After fitting the longitudinal model of variance components, no difference was observed between the FC of the two groups due to the baseline effect. However, in the longitudinal trend of FC, there was a statistically significant difference between the three pairs of cerebellum left, cerebellum right, superior frontal gyrus left, superior frontal gyrus right, thalamus left, and thalamus right in the TBI group compared to the control group.
Conclusion: The results showed that FC was sharply increased in 3 pairs of areas in people with TBI. This hyper-connectivity can affect individuals' cognitive functions, including motor and sensory functions. The exact extent of this effect is unclear and requires further investigation by neuroscientists.
导言:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是导致全球死亡的主要原因之一,也是世界卫生组织(WHO)指出的最重要的疾病之一。一些研究认为,脑损伤会显著增加大脑的功能连接性(FC)。这种超连接性的影响尚未完全明了,神经科学家正在对其进行研究。因此,本研究确定了大脑中哪些区域在脑损伤后功能连通性会急剧增加:本研究使用的数据是从可访问的开放式功能磁共振成像(fMRI)网站下载的。数据包括 14 名严重创伤性脑损伤患者和 12 名健康人的 fMRI。方差成分纵向模型研究了创伤性脑损伤组和对照组之间基线效应和纵向趋势中FC的差异:结果:在拟合了方差分量纵向模型后,没有观察到基线效应导致的两组 FC 之间的差异。然而,在 FC 的纵向趋势中,创伤性脑损伤组的小脑左侧、小脑右侧、额上回左侧、额上回右侧、丘脑左侧和丘脑右侧三对之间的差异与对照组相比具有统计学意义:结论:研究结果表明,创伤性脑损伤患者的三对区域的FC急剧增加。结论:研究结果表明,创伤性脑损伤患者 3 对区域的 FC 均急剧增加,这种超连接性会影响患者的认知功能,包括运动和感觉功能。这种影响的确切程度尚不清楚,需要神经科学家进一步研究。
期刊介绍:
BioTechniques is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original laboratory methods, related technical and software tools, and methods-oriented review articles that are of broad interest to professional life scientists, as well as to scientists from other disciplines (e.g., chemistry, physics, computer science, plant and agricultural science and climate science) interested in life science applications for their technologies.
Since 1983, BioTechniques has been a leading peer-reviewed journal for methods-related research. The journal considers:
Reports describing innovative new methods, platforms and software, substantive modifications to existing methods, or innovative applications of existing methods, techniques & tools to new models or scientific questions
Descriptions of technical tools that facilitate the design or performance of experiments or data analysis, such as software and simple laboratory devices
Surveys of technical approaches related to broad fields of research
Reviews discussing advancements in techniques and methods related to broad fields of research
Letters to the Editor and Expert Opinions highlighting interesting observations or cautionary tales concerning experimental design, methodology or analysis.