Development Induced Displacement; A Review of Risks Faced by Communities in Developing Countries

Caroline Aboda, F. Mugagga, P. Byakagaba, G. Nabanoga
{"title":"Development Induced Displacement; A Review of Risks Faced by Communities in Developing Countries","authors":"Caroline Aboda, F. Mugagga, P. Byakagaba, G. Nabanoga","doi":"10.13189/sa.2019.070205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"About 15 million people every year are forced to live their homes to give way for huge development projects such as dams, highways, and mining. In most developing countries, such projects have been noted to increase ecological and social vulnerability, thus leaving the affected people displaced, disempowered and destitute. The literature review paper focused on the different risks communities are exposed to due to development induced displacement and resettlement. The data presented is review of online peer-reviewed and grey literature between the years 1980 through 2018. The risks analyzed through the Impoverishment, Risk and Reconstruction (IRR) model acts as a guide in selecting and understanding the risks of development induced displacement and Resettlement (DIDR) during social vulnerability assessment. Often the question of social vulnerability has been largely ignored due to the difficulty in quantification. Risk analysis also provides ground to further investigate reasons for the occurrence and persistency of the risks, in developing countries such as India, Sudan, and Kenya. The findings of the review through the IRR model indicated that displacement and resettlement exposes project affected people to some opportunities, but largely associated with more risks. Some of the reasons for the persistency of the risks included; compensation for lost properties and lack of experience and capacity to handle resettlement processes. Identifying reasons for the persistency of the already known risks, especially in developing countries builds on the previous work on DIDR risks by Micheal Cernea and other researchers.","PeriodicalId":21798,"journal":{"name":"Sociology and anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology and anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2019.070205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

About 15 million people every year are forced to live their homes to give way for huge development projects such as dams, highways, and mining. In most developing countries, such projects have been noted to increase ecological and social vulnerability, thus leaving the affected people displaced, disempowered and destitute. The literature review paper focused on the different risks communities are exposed to due to development induced displacement and resettlement. The data presented is review of online peer-reviewed and grey literature between the years 1980 through 2018. The risks analyzed through the Impoverishment, Risk and Reconstruction (IRR) model acts as a guide in selecting and understanding the risks of development induced displacement and Resettlement (DIDR) during social vulnerability assessment. Often the question of social vulnerability has been largely ignored due to the difficulty in quantification. Risk analysis also provides ground to further investigate reasons for the occurrence and persistency of the risks, in developing countries such as India, Sudan, and Kenya. The findings of the review through the IRR model indicated that displacement and resettlement exposes project affected people to some opportunities, but largely associated with more risks. Some of the reasons for the persistency of the risks included; compensation for lost properties and lack of experience and capacity to handle resettlement processes. Identifying reasons for the persistency of the already known risks, especially in developing countries builds on the previous work on DIDR risks by Micheal Cernea and other researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发引起的位移;发展中国家社区面临的风险综述
每年约有1500万人被迫迁离自己的家园,为水坝、高速公路和采矿等大型开发项目让路。在大多数发展中国家,人们注意到这些项目增加了生态和社会脆弱性,从而使受影响的人民流离失所、丧失权力和赤贫。这篇文献综述论文的重点是社区由于发展引起的流离失所和重新安置而面临的不同风险。所呈现的数据是对1980年至2018年间在线同行评议文献和灰色文献的回顾。通过贫困、风险和重建(IRR)模型分析的风险对社会脆弱性评估中发展诱发的流离失所和重新安置(DIDR)风险的选择和理解具有指导意义。由于难以量化,社会脆弱性问题往往在很大程度上被忽视。风险分析还为进一步调查印度、苏丹和肯尼亚等发展中国家风险发生和持续存在的原因提供了依据。通过IRR模型进行审查的结果表明,流离失所和重新安置使受项目影响的人获得了一些机会,但在很大程度上与更多的风险相关。风险持续存在的一些原因包括;对财产损失的赔偿以及缺乏处理重新安置程序的经验和能力。确定已知风险持续存在的原因,特别是在发展中国家,是建立在Micheal Cernea和其他研究人员先前关于DIDR风险的工作的基础上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Inches: Unveiling Cultural Influences and Gender Perceptions Regarding Height Norms in Punjabi Group Okolo's African Being-with and Heidegger's Idea of Mitsein: A Cross-Cultural Dialogue Ethno Eco-Tourism: Utilizing Nature and Culture for More Sustainable Tourism Development Socio-economic Impact of Old Persons' Cash Transfer in Mulundi Sub-location, Kitui County-Kenya Quality of Life Evaluation through Economic, Social and Cultural Indicators: Case Study Government Housing in Cairo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1