Сomparative analysis of the age characteristics of educational institutions of different types as subjects of educational and professional activities

Q4 Social Sciences Russian Psychological Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-24 DOI:10.31499/2617-2100.9.2022.269999
Olesya Posvistak
{"title":"Сomparative analysis of the age characteristics of educational institutions of different types as subjects of educational and professional activities","authors":"Olesya Posvistak","doi":"10.31499/2617-2100.9.2022.269999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the age characteristics of the students of educational institutions of different types as subjects of educational and professional activity. It is noted that if we consider a student of the 1st year of a higher education institution, then objectively it is possible to single out the formed self-esteem and worldview, independence. He can control his own actions and emotions. He is at the peak of his intellectual abilities. While studying in grades 10-11, he learned various types of independent work and prepared for independent search for knowledge. However, the degree of development of subject properties can be different, and of course, the process of forming subject properties is still underway. \nAs for the 1st-year college student, the picture will be different. Self-esteem is almost formed, but it is not stable. He is less independent and cannot always control his own emotions and behavior. Only by the end of the 1st year (achievements of 16-17 years) does he begin to fully control himself. Since the formation of cognitive processes is completed, he still has to learn to control them. Unfortunately, first-year students of 15-16 years do not fully possess the skills of independent work: they do not know how to plan, work with scientific literature, and overcome serious difficulties at work. Communication with peers is important for him, and he relies more on their assessment of his own personality and activities. Therefore, it depends on communication with peers.From this it can be concluded that the students of colleges are significantly different from students of institutions of higher education, because they are at the stage of formation of subjectivity, worldview, cognitive abilities, self-esteem and self-regulation are at the stage of formation, the emotional background is unstable. In communication, a college student depends on the opinion of peers. \nThus, educational and professional activity is aimed at forming the personality of a professional as a subject of professional activity: an active person who knows how to independently plan his own activities, who has self-awareness and self-regulation. A first-year college applicant is significantly different from a first-year student at a higher education institution, because he is at the stage of becoming a subject. The existing contradiction between society's high need for independent and self-realized specialists capable of active adaptation and the underdevelopment of a part of college applicants as subjects of educational and professional activity indicates an important problem - the need to form the subjectivity of first-year college applicants. Therefore, college teachers face the responsible psychological and pedagogical task of forming the student's personality as a subject of educational and professional activity. For this purpose, it is necessary to correct his self-esteem, teach him self-regulation skills, the ability to plan, organize his own activities, manage time, fully communicate and learn independently.","PeriodicalId":36154,"journal":{"name":"Russian Psychological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Psychological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31499/2617-2100.9.2022.269999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the age characteristics of the students of educational institutions of different types as subjects of educational and professional activity. It is noted that if we consider a student of the 1st year of a higher education institution, then objectively it is possible to single out the formed self-esteem and worldview, independence. He can control his own actions and emotions. He is at the peak of his intellectual abilities. While studying in grades 10-11, he learned various types of independent work and prepared for independent search for knowledge. However, the degree of development of subject properties can be different, and of course, the process of forming subject properties is still underway. As for the 1st-year college student, the picture will be different. Self-esteem is almost formed, but it is not stable. He is less independent and cannot always control his own emotions and behavior. Only by the end of the 1st year (achievements of 16-17 years) does he begin to fully control himself. Since the formation of cognitive processes is completed, he still has to learn to control them. Unfortunately, first-year students of 15-16 years do not fully possess the skills of independent work: they do not know how to plan, work with scientific literature, and overcome serious difficulties at work. Communication with peers is important for him, and he relies more on their assessment of his own personality and activities. Therefore, it depends on communication with peers.From this it can be concluded that the students of colleges are significantly different from students of institutions of higher education, because they are at the stage of formation of subjectivity, worldview, cognitive abilities, self-esteem and self-regulation are at the stage of formation, the emotional background is unstable. In communication, a college student depends on the opinion of peers. Thus, educational and professional activity is aimed at forming the personality of a professional as a subject of professional activity: an active person who knows how to independently plan his own activities, who has self-awareness and self-regulation. A first-year college applicant is significantly different from a first-year student at a higher education institution, because he is at the stage of becoming a subject. The existing contradiction between society's high need for independent and self-realized specialists capable of active adaptation and the underdevelopment of a part of college applicants as subjects of educational and professional activity indicates an important problem - the need to form the subjectivity of first-year college applicants. Therefore, college teachers face the responsible psychological and pedagogical task of forming the student's personality as a subject of educational and professional activity. For this purpose, it is necessary to correct his self-esteem, teach him self-regulation skills, the ability to plan, organize his own activities, manage time, fully communicate and learn independently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Сomparative不同类型教育机构作为教育和专业活动主体的年龄特征分析
本文对不同类型教育机构学生作为教育活动主体和职业活动主体的年龄特征进行了比较分析。值得注意的是,如果我们考虑高等教育机构的一年级学生,那么客观地说,有可能挑选出形成的自尊和世界观,独立性。他能控制自己的行为和情绪。他的智力达到了顶峰。在10-11年级的学习中,他学会了各种类型的独立作业,为独立探索知识做好了准备。但是,主体性的发展程度可以是不同的,当然,主体性的形成过程还在进行中。对于大学一年级的学生来说,情况就不一样了。自尊基本形成了,但并不稳定。他不太独立,不能总是控制自己的情绪和行为。只有在第一年(16-17岁的成就)结束时,他才开始完全控制自己。既然认知过程的形成已经完成,他还需要学习控制它们。遗憾的是,15-16岁的一年级学生并没有完全具备独立工作的技能:他们不知道如何计划,如何处理科学文献,如何克服工作中的严重困难。与同龄人的交流对他来说很重要,他更多地依赖于他们对自己个性和活动的评估。因此,它依赖于与同伴的交流。由此可以看出,高校学生与普通高等学校学生存在着显著的差异,因为大学生正处于主体性形成阶段,世界观、认知能力、自尊和自我调节都处于形成阶段,情感背景不稳定。在交流中,大学生依赖于同龄人的意见。因此,教育和专业活动旨在形成专业人员作为专业活动主体的人格:一个知道如何独立策划自己的活动,具有自我意识和自我调节能力的活跃的人。大学一年级申请者与高等教育机构的一年级学生有很大的不同,因为他处于成为一个主体的阶段。社会对能够主动适应的独立、自我实现的专业人才的高度需求与一部分大学申请者作为教育和专业活动主体的发展不足之间存在的矛盾表明了一个重要问题——需要形成大学一年级申请者的主体性。因此,作为教育和专业活动的主体,高校教师面临着塑造学生人格的责任心理和教学任务。为此,有必要纠正他的自尊,教他自我调节技能,计划、组织自己的活动、管理时间、充分沟通和独立学习的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Psychological Journal
Russian Psychological Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Аппаратно-программный комплекс для проведения тензотреморометрических измерений в психофизиологических исследованиях Основные результаты исследования механизмов психической саморегуляции на основе метода оценки матрицы базальных эмоций Взаимосвязь психологического капитала и выбора студентами позиций взаимодействия и стратегий самоутверждения Процесс сравнения изображений эмоциональных экспрессий Happiness in the Workplace of Women Lecturers Based on Work-Family Balance and Work Engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1