Comparison of parasite load and average daily weight gain in suckling beef calves treated with macrocyclic lactones in either an extended-release injectable or a pouron formulation

R. Kasimanickam, V. Kasimanickam, D. Eickert
{"title":"Comparison of parasite load and average daily weight gain in suckling beef calves treated with macrocyclic lactones in either an extended-release injectable or a pouron formulation","authors":"R. Kasimanickam, V. Kasimanickam, D. Eickert","doi":"10.5958/0974-0813.2020.00011.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study was to compare the effect of macrocyclic lactones anthelmintic in either an extended-release injectable (ERI) or a pour-on (PO) formulation on parasite load and average daily weight gain in suckling beef calves. Spring born Angus cross beef calves (n=1228) grazing on 17 pastures from 4 cow-calf operations in Washington State during 2017 were included. Calves in each pasture were randomly assigned to ERI (n=611; Long Range®, 50 mg of eprinomectin/ml, Merial Inc., Duluth, GA, USA; @ 50 mg or 1ml/50 kg BW) or PO (n=671; Ivomec®, 5 mg ivermectin/ml; Merial Inc., Duluth, GA; @ 500 mcg or 1 ml/10 kg BW) treatment 105 days prior to weaning (approximately at 8 months of age) at the time of pasture turn-out in mid-May. Calves were weighed initially, at mid-trail (approximately 55 days after start) and at weaning. Faecal samples were taken from a subset of calves (n=30/pasture; 15 in each treatment group, a total of 510 calves) for faecal egg counts (FEC) at the start of the study and again at 15, 30, 60 and 90 d later. The data were analyzed using a mixed model. The FEC did not vary between calves in treatment and control groups on day 0 (P>0.1). However, accounting for temperament by treatment interaction, ERI treated calves had lower FEC compared with PO treated calves on day 90 (P<0.01). Accounting for gender (P<0.05), temperament (P<0.05) and treatment by age (P<0.01), ERI treated calves gained more weight compared with PO treated calves (P<0.01). In conclusion, treatment of nursing calves at late-spring with ERI experienced a reduction in GI (gastrointestinal) parasite load and a measurable but modest increase in weight gain compared with calves treated with PO.","PeriodicalId":17562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary parasitology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0813.2020.00011.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare the effect of macrocyclic lactones anthelmintic in either an extended-release injectable (ERI) or a pour-on (PO) formulation on parasite load and average daily weight gain in suckling beef calves. Spring born Angus cross beef calves (n=1228) grazing on 17 pastures from 4 cow-calf operations in Washington State during 2017 were included. Calves in each pasture were randomly assigned to ERI (n=611; Long Range®, 50 mg of eprinomectin/ml, Merial Inc., Duluth, GA, USA; @ 50 mg or 1ml/50 kg BW) or PO (n=671; Ivomec®, 5 mg ivermectin/ml; Merial Inc., Duluth, GA; @ 500 mcg or 1 ml/10 kg BW) treatment 105 days prior to weaning (approximately at 8 months of age) at the time of pasture turn-out in mid-May. Calves were weighed initially, at mid-trail (approximately 55 days after start) and at weaning. Faecal samples were taken from a subset of calves (n=30/pasture; 15 in each treatment group, a total of 510 calves) for faecal egg counts (FEC) at the start of the study and again at 15, 30, 60 and 90 d later. The data were analyzed using a mixed model. The FEC did not vary between calves in treatment and control groups on day 0 (P>0.1). However, accounting for temperament by treatment interaction, ERI treated calves had lower FEC compared with PO treated calves on day 90 (P<0.01). Accounting for gender (P<0.05), temperament (P<0.05) and treatment by age (P<0.01), ERI treated calves gained more weight compared with PO treated calves (P<0.01). In conclusion, treatment of nursing calves at late-spring with ERI experienced a reduction in GI (gastrointestinal) parasite load and a measurable but modest increase in weight gain compared with calves treated with PO.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用大环内酯缓释注射剂或灌注制剂治疗的哺乳牛肉犊牛的寄生虫负荷和平均日增重的比较
本研究的目的是比较大环内酯驱虫剂在缓释注射(ERI)和灌注(PO)制剂中对哺乳牛肉犊牛寄生虫负荷和平均日增重的影响。纳入了2017年在华盛顿州4个小牛养殖场的17个牧场放牧的春季出生的安格斯杂交肉牛(n=1228)。每个牧场的犊牛随机分为ERI组(n=611;Long Range®,50mg eprinomectin/ml, Merial Inc., Duluth, GA, USA;@ 50毫克或1ml/50公斤体重)或PO (n=671;Ivomec®,5mg伊维菌素/ml;佐治亚州德卢斯的梅里亚公司;在断奶前105天(大约在8个月大时),即5月中旬牧场出栏时,进行500微克或1毫升/10公斤体重的处理。犊牛分别在试验中期(约开始后55天)和断奶时称重。粪便样本取自一小部分小牛(n=30/牧场;在研究开始时和在15、30、60和90 d后再次进行粪蛋计数(FEC),每个处理组15头,共510头犊牛。使用混合模型对数据进行分析。第0天,试验组与对照组的FEC差异无统计学意义(P>0.1)。但考虑到处理交互作用的气质因素,ERI处理犊牛第90天FEC低于PO处理犊牛(P<0.01)。考虑性别(P<0.05)、气质(P<0.05)和年龄处理(P<0.01), ERI处理犊牛增重高于PO处理犊牛(P<0.01)。综上所述,与PO相比,晚春哺乳犊牛接受ERI治疗后,GI(胃肠道)寄生虫负荷减少,体重增加可测量但适度增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary parasitology
Journal of Veterinary parasitology Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delta Traps with Pheromone Pellet Baits to Lure House Flies in Poultry Houses Evaluation of Dot-ELISA and western blot tests for the diagnosis of porcine cysticercosis Ornithonyssus bursa (Berlese, 1888) Infestation in A Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Occurrence of Setaria digitata in peritoneal cavity of a Gaolao bull in Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Small Ruminants in Gamo Zone, Southern Ethiopia, with a Special Reference to Field Survey on Parasite Management and Risk Factor Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1