Spatialising the collective: the spatial practices of two housing projects in Berlin

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Social & Cultural Geography Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI:10.1080/14649365.2022.2115118
Josefina Jaureguiberry-Mondion
{"title":"Spatialising the collective: the spatial practices of two housing projects in Berlin","authors":"Josefina Jaureguiberry-Mondion","doi":"10.1080/14649365.2022.2115118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article delves into the everyday experiences of alternative collective housing initiatives, examining how the physical form, the organization of space, and the interactions within it encourage the emergence of specific feelings. Based on interviews carried out in two collective housing projects in Berlin – one older project that was historically a squat and legalized as an autonomous housing project, and one newer model that extends the culture of squatting and emphasizes collective property rights – this article argues that these initiatives are oriented towards different ways of living through how individual and collective bodies inhabit and experiment with their respective houses. In studying the internal dynamics and the multiplicity of roles enabled by the experimentation with space, this research suggests that these housing projects might be understood as transversal affective/political territories. In line with Sara Ahmed’s use of orientations, it is argued that these housing initiatives foster specific orientations towards the project of collective living by adopting micropolitical experiments with housing spaces. It is also argued that it is not only about designing or renovating a house with certain material characteristics that will allow certain encounters and concomitant feelings, but that practice and repetition are fundamental to their project of collective life.","PeriodicalId":48072,"journal":{"name":"Social & Cultural Geography","volume":"51 1","pages":"1921 - 1940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Cultural Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2022.2115118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article delves into the everyday experiences of alternative collective housing initiatives, examining how the physical form, the organization of space, and the interactions within it encourage the emergence of specific feelings. Based on interviews carried out in two collective housing projects in Berlin – one older project that was historically a squat and legalized as an autonomous housing project, and one newer model that extends the culture of squatting and emphasizes collective property rights – this article argues that these initiatives are oriented towards different ways of living through how individual and collective bodies inhabit and experiment with their respective houses. In studying the internal dynamics and the multiplicity of roles enabled by the experimentation with space, this research suggests that these housing projects might be understood as transversal affective/political territories. In line with Sara Ahmed’s use of orientations, it is argued that these housing initiatives foster specific orientations towards the project of collective living by adopting micropolitical experiments with housing spaces. It is also argued that it is not only about designing or renovating a house with certain material characteristics that will allow certain encounters and concomitant feelings, but that practice and repetition are fundamental to their project of collective life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间化集体:柏林两个住宅项目的空间实践
本文深入探讨了另类集体住宅项目的日常体验,探讨了物理形式、空间组织以及其中的相互作用如何激发特定感受的出现。基于对柏林两个集体住房项目的采访——一个是历史上的深蹲项目,并被合法化为自主住房项目,另一个是扩展了深蹲文化并强调集体产权的新模式——本文认为,这些倡议是通过个人和集体如何居住和实验各自的房屋来导向不同的生活方式。在研究内部动态和空间实验所带来的多重角色时,本研究表明,这些住房项目可以被理解为横向情感/政治领域。与Sara Ahmed对取向的使用一致,有人认为这些住房倡议通过对住房空间进行微观政治实验,促进了对集体生活项目的具体取向。也有人认为,这不仅仅是关于设计或翻新具有特定材料特征的房屋,这些材料特征将允许某些相遇和伴随的感受,而且实践和重复是他们集体生活项目的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
99
期刊最新文献
‘Plastic addicts’: troubling consumer tropes in Thailand’s neoliberal waste environment Philosophy of the Tourist Visual disability in spatio-temporal assemblages: conceptualizing reference points from a non-pointillist perspective Negotiating trust in AI-enabled navigation technologies: imaginaries, ecologies, habits Temporalities of creativity in city-making: DIY urbanism in post-earthquake Christchurch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1