Queering School Leadership Preparation Curricula for Gender Justice in Public Schooling

S. Wilcox
{"title":"Queering School Leadership Preparation Curricula for Gender Justice in Public Schooling","authors":"S. Wilcox","doi":"10.1177/10526846221149213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent education policies and laws such as a new rule to Title IX by the U.S. Department of Education (2020) and the Parental Rights in Education (HB 1557, 2022) also known as the “Don’t Say Gay” law in Florida have important implications for how educational leaders are expected to address issues of gender, sexuality, and school-based sexual violence in public schools. The purpose of this article is to examine how education laws, policies, and practices privilege heteronormative values in our public schools and how the lack of educational preparation of school officials are complicit in the maintenance of hegemonic racial, gender and sexuality structures in public schooling. Structural intersectionality grounds this study and maps the corporeal consequences of systems of oppression while political intersectionality describes the strategies used to fight against those systems of oppression (Crenshaw, 2014). The study uses a qualitative narrative inquiry methodology to examine coursework data of doctoral students in an education leadership program to interpret their understanding of gender justice in teaching and leadership in public schools. Critical policy analysis as a discursive analytic is used in this study to reveal the interrelatedness of theory and method. The implications of this study bear important implications for understanding the need for gender justice curriculum in school leadership preparation programs and offers thoughts on how queering curricula can be an act of education activism.","PeriodicalId":92928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of school leadership","volume":"1 1","pages":"163 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of school leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846221149213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent education policies and laws such as a new rule to Title IX by the U.S. Department of Education (2020) and the Parental Rights in Education (HB 1557, 2022) also known as the “Don’t Say Gay” law in Florida have important implications for how educational leaders are expected to address issues of gender, sexuality, and school-based sexual violence in public schools. The purpose of this article is to examine how education laws, policies, and practices privilege heteronormative values in our public schools and how the lack of educational preparation of school officials are complicit in the maintenance of hegemonic racial, gender and sexuality structures in public schooling. Structural intersectionality grounds this study and maps the corporeal consequences of systems of oppression while political intersectionality describes the strategies used to fight against those systems of oppression (Crenshaw, 2014). The study uses a qualitative narrative inquiry methodology to examine coursework data of doctoral students in an education leadership program to interpret their understanding of gender justice in teaching and leadership in public schools. Critical policy analysis as a discursive analytic is used in this study to reveal the interrelatedness of theory and method. The implications of this study bear important implications for understanding the need for gender justice curriculum in school leadership preparation programs and offers thoughts on how queering curricula can be an act of education activism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公立学校性别公正之酷儿学校领导预备课程
最近的教育政策和法律,如美国教育部(2020年)对第九条的新规定和佛罗里达州的“父母教育权利”(HB 1557, 2022年),也被称为“不要说同性恋”法,对教育领导者如何解决公立学校性别、性行为和基于学校的性暴力问题具有重要意义。本文的目的是研究教育法律、政策和实践是如何在我们的公立学校中为异性恋价值观提供特权的,以及学校官员缺乏教育准备是如何在公立学校中维持种族、性别和性结构的霸权的。结构交叉性是本研究的基础,并描绘了压迫制度的物质后果,而政治交叉性描述了用于对抗这些压迫制度的策略(Crenshaw, 2014)。本研究采用定性叙事探究的方法来研究教育领导项目博士生的课程作业数据,以解释他们对公立学校教学和领导中的性别公正的理解。批判性政策分析作为一种话语分析,在本研究中揭示了理论和方法的相互关系。本研究的意义对于理解学校领导准备课程中性别公正课程的必要性具有重要意义,并提供了关于酷儿课程如何成为教育行动主义行为的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Instructional Program Coherence: A Structural Support for Teacher Psychological Needs Principals’ Discursive Framing and Communications and Educators’ Job Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic The Effect of Middle Leaders’ Cognitive Complexity on Team Performance and Conflict Management Through Middle Leaders’ Positive Perception of Diversity Academic Culture: Its Meaning, Measure and Contribution to Student Learning Navigating Emotional Discomfort in Developing Equity-Driven School Leaders: A Conceptual-Pedagogical Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1