Beyond thermoeconomics? The concept of Extended Exergy Accounting and its application to the analysis and design of thermal systems

Enrico Sciubba
{"title":"Beyond thermoeconomics? The concept of Extended Exergy Accounting and its application to the analysis and design of thermal systems","authors":"Enrico Sciubba","doi":"10.1016/S1164-0235(01)00012-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a novel approach to the evaluation of energy conversion processes and systems, based on an <em>extended representation of their exergy flow diagram</em>. This approach is a systematic attempt to integrate into a unified coherent formalism both Cumulative Exergy Consumption and Thermo-economic methods, and constitutes a generalisation of both, in that its framework allows for a direct quantitative comparison of non-energetic quantities like <em>labour</em> and <em>environmental impact</em> (hence the apposition ‘Extended’). A critical examination of the existing state-of-the-art of energy- and exergy analysis methods and paradigms indicates that an extension of the existing ‘Design and Optimisation’ procedures to include explicitly ‘non-energetic externalities’ is indeed feasible. It appears that it can indeed be successfully argued that some of the issues that are difficult to address with a purely monetary theory of value can be resolved by Extended Exergy Accounting (‘EEA’ in the following) methods without introducing arbitrary assumptions external to the theory. In this respect, EEA can be regarded as a natural development of the economic theory of production of commodities, which it extends by properly accounting for the unavoidable energy dissipation in the productive chain. While a systematic description of the EEA theory is discussed in previous work by the same author, the present paper aims at a more specific target, and presents a formal representation of the application of EEA to a cogenerating plant based on a gas turbine process. It is shown that the solution indeed leads to an ‘optimal’ design, and that its formalism embeds even extended Thermo-economic formulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100518,"journal":{"name":"Exergy, An International Journal","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 68-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1164-0235(01)00012-7","citationCount":"323","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exergy, An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164023501000127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 323

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to the evaluation of energy conversion processes and systems, based on an extended representation of their exergy flow diagram. This approach is a systematic attempt to integrate into a unified coherent formalism both Cumulative Exergy Consumption and Thermo-economic methods, and constitutes a generalisation of both, in that its framework allows for a direct quantitative comparison of non-energetic quantities like labour and environmental impact (hence the apposition ‘Extended’). A critical examination of the existing state-of-the-art of energy- and exergy analysis methods and paradigms indicates that an extension of the existing ‘Design and Optimisation’ procedures to include explicitly ‘non-energetic externalities’ is indeed feasible. It appears that it can indeed be successfully argued that some of the issues that are difficult to address with a purely monetary theory of value can be resolved by Extended Exergy Accounting (‘EEA’ in the following) methods without introducing arbitrary assumptions external to the theory. In this respect, EEA can be regarded as a natural development of the economic theory of production of commodities, which it extends by properly accounting for the unavoidable energy dissipation in the productive chain. While a systematic description of the EEA theory is discussed in previous work by the same author, the present paper aims at a more specific target, and presents a formal representation of the application of EEA to a cogenerating plant based on a gas turbine process. It is shown that the solution indeed leads to an ‘optimal’ design, and that its formalism embeds even extended Thermo-economic formulations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除了thermoeconomics吗?扩展火用会计的概念及其在热系统分析和设计中的应用
本文提出了一种新的方法来评估能量转换过程和系统,基于其火用流程图的扩展表示。这种方法是一种系统的尝试,将累积能源消耗和热经济方法整合到一个统一的连贯的形式体系中,并构成了两者的概括,因为它的框架允许对劳动力和环境影响等非能量量进行直接定量比较(因此反对“扩展”)。对现有最先进的能源和能源分析方法和范式的批判性检查表明,扩展现有的“设计和优化”程序,明确包括“非能源外部性”确实是可行的。似乎确实可以成功地认为,一些难以用纯粹的货币价值理论解决的问题可以通过扩展能源会计(以下简称“EEA”)方法来解决,而无需引入理论外部的任意假设。在这方面,EEA可以被视为商品生产经济理论的自然发展,它通过适当地考虑到生产链中不可避免的能量消耗而延伸。虽然同一作者在之前的工作中讨论了对EEA理论的系统描述,但本文针对更具体的目标,并提出了基于燃气轮机过程的EEA在热电联产电厂中的应用的正式表示。结果表明,该解决方案确实导致了“最优”设计,并且其形式主义甚至嵌入了扩展的热经济公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author index Announcement Some thermodynamic remarks on non-equilibrium fluid streams The exergy flux of radiative heat transfer for the special case of blackbody radiation Work and entropy production aspects of irreversible processes in closed and steady-state open systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1