Comparative Analysis of Intravitreal Ranibizumab versus Laser Therapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity

Ahmed Elabbasy, Mona Abdelbaky, H. Al-shehri, Ilene Padua, A. Hamed, Aladdin Kashlan, Abdullah Alrobaie, Abdulrahman Albarqi, Ammar Aldawalibi, A. Ammari, Fawaz T. Kashlan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Intravitreal Ranibizumab versus Laser Therapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity","authors":"Ahmed Elabbasy, Mona Abdelbaky, H. Al-shehri, Ilene Padua, A. Hamed, Aladdin Kashlan, Abdullah Alrobaie, Abdulrahman Albarqi, Ammar Aldawalibi, A. Ammari, Fawaz T. Kashlan","doi":"10.51847/6vtxevditu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The therapeutic effects of intravitreal Ranibizumab injection (IVR) and the efficacy of laser photocoagulation for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are compared. The screening criteria for ROP were infants born with less than 32 weeks gestational period and/or weighed less than 1500 grams or unstable clinical course. After ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board, this retrospective study was conducted. The study considered 1315 infants and an observation was made that 36/42 (85.7%) eyes showed regression of ROP in the IVR group whereas 27/27 (100%) eyes that were treated with laser therapy showed regression of ROP (p=0.09). A considerable discrepancy in habituation of ROP in both groups with 12 eyes (28.6%) has been noted which is showing recurrence of ROP in the IVR group compared to 1 eye (3.7%) in the Laser group (P=0.01. In terms of anisometropia and refractive error, both groups made no notable difference. Squint was found remarkably higher in the laser group (29.6%) than in the IVR group (4.8%) (P=0.01). It was found that treating ROP eyes with laser treatment leads to greater improvement in infants than when treated by IVR. Moreover, a significant recurrence of ROP was discovered after IVR treatment in comparison with the laser treatment.","PeriodicalId":8308,"journal":{"name":"Archives Of Pharmacy Practice","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives Of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51847/6vtxevditu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The therapeutic effects of intravitreal Ranibizumab injection (IVR) and the efficacy of laser photocoagulation for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are compared. The screening criteria for ROP were infants born with less than 32 weeks gestational period and/or weighed less than 1500 grams or unstable clinical course. After ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board, this retrospective study was conducted. The study considered 1315 infants and an observation was made that 36/42 (85.7%) eyes showed regression of ROP in the IVR group whereas 27/27 (100%) eyes that were treated with laser therapy showed regression of ROP (p=0.09). A considerable discrepancy in habituation of ROP in both groups with 12 eyes (28.6%) has been noted which is showing recurrence of ROP in the IVR group compared to 1 eye (3.7%) in the Laser group (P=0.01. In terms of anisometropia and refractive error, both groups made no notable difference. Squint was found remarkably higher in the laser group (29.6%) than in the IVR group (4.8%) (P=0.01). It was found that treating ROP eyes with laser treatment leads to greater improvement in infants than when treated by IVR. Moreover, a significant recurrence of ROP was discovered after IVR treatment in comparison with the laser treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雷尼单抗玻璃体注射与激光治疗早产儿视网膜病变的比较分析
比较雷尼单抗玻璃体内注射(IVR)与激光光凝治疗早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的疗效。ROP的筛查标准是出生小于32周妊娠期和/或体重小于1500克或临床病程不稳定的婴儿。在获得机构审查委员会的伦理批准后,进行了这项回顾性研究。本研究纳入1315例婴儿,观察到IVR组36/42(85.7%)眼ROP消退,而激光组27/27(100%)眼ROP消退(p=0.09)。两组12只眼(28.6%)的ROP习惯化有相当大的差异,IVR组ROP复发,而激光组1只眼(3.7%)复发(P=0.01)。在屈光参差和屈光不正方面,两组无显著差异。激光组斜视发生率(29.6%)明显高于IVR组(4.8%)(P=0.01)。研究发现,用激光治疗婴儿ROP眼比用IVR治疗有更大的改善。此外,与激光治疗相比,IVR治疗后ROP复发明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives Of Pharmacy Practice
Archives Of Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Pharmacy Practice, Clinical Pharmacy, Social and administrative pharmacy, Hospital pharmacy, Pharmaceutical technology, Pharmaceutical chemistry, Pharmaceutical analysis, Behavioral medicines, Statistical methods in Pharmacy, Public health in pharmacy, health communication, communication skills, counseling, community pharmacy practice, Pharmacy management, pharmacoecnomics, pharmaceutical care, evidence base medicines, therapeutics, pharmacology, organ medicines, Pharmacy education etc . Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Atomic Force Microscopy in the Study of the Properties of the Erythrocyte Membrane Medical and Pharmaceutical Care of the Wounded and Injured Hybrid Encryption Technique to Enhance Security of Health Data in Cloud Environment Burnout and Mental Illness related Stigma among Healthcare Professionals in Pakistan The Use of Irinex in the Treatment of Cluster Headaches and Other Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalgias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1