Normative data for the numeric vertical line test: a comparison of verticality accuracy at different life stages and with different verticality measures

IF 0.3 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Balance and Communication Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/21695717.2022.2061689
Gabrielly Fernanda Silva, Monalisa Resende Nascimento, Pablo Andrei Appelt, R. Bazan, L. P. S. D. de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto
{"title":"Normative data for the numeric vertical line test: a comparison of verticality accuracy at different life stages and with different verticality measures","authors":"Gabrielly Fernanda Silva, Monalisa Resende Nascimento, Pablo Andrei Appelt, R. Bazan, L. P. S. D. de Souza, Gustavo José Luvizutto","doi":"10.1080/21695717.2022.2061689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective We used the numeric vertical line test (NVLT) to analyze perceptual accuracy and precision of verticality at various life stages in a healthy population and compared the results of the NVLT with tests of verticality. Methods This cross-sectional study involved three participant groups: (a) 50 children, (b) 50 adults, and (c) 50 older adults. Each participant underwent three tests: (a) the NVLT, (b) the subjective visual vertical (SVV), and (c) the subjective haptic vertical (SHV). The test results for each age group were compared using analysis of variance, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate correlations between all tests. Results In the accuracy analysis, children (p = 0.003) and older adults (p = 0.003) were found to show lower accuracy on the NVLT than adults; children had lower accuracy on the SVV test than adults (p = 0.0008); and children (p < 0.001) and older adults (p = 0.04) had lower accuracy on the SHV test than adults. In the precision analysis, children (p = 0.006) and older adults (p = 0.006) were found to have lower precision on the NVLT than adults; children (p = 0.002) and older adults (p = 0.003) had lower precision on the SVV test than adults; and children (p = 0.0009) and older adults (p = 0.0006) had lower precision on the SHV than adults. Only the NVLT and SVV showed a significant association in adults (r = 0.57; p = 0.02). Conclusion Children and older adults showed less accurate verticality perceptions and lower precision levels for spatial-number displacement and visual and proprioceptive verticalities than adults.","PeriodicalId":43765,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Balance and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Balance and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2022.2061689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective We used the numeric vertical line test (NVLT) to analyze perceptual accuracy and precision of verticality at various life stages in a healthy population and compared the results of the NVLT with tests of verticality. Methods This cross-sectional study involved three participant groups: (a) 50 children, (b) 50 adults, and (c) 50 older adults. Each participant underwent three tests: (a) the NVLT, (b) the subjective visual vertical (SVV), and (c) the subjective haptic vertical (SHV). The test results for each age group were compared using analysis of variance, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate correlations between all tests. Results In the accuracy analysis, children (p = 0.003) and older adults (p = 0.003) were found to show lower accuracy on the NVLT than adults; children had lower accuracy on the SVV test than adults (p = 0.0008); and children (p < 0.001) and older adults (p = 0.04) had lower accuracy on the SHV test than adults. In the precision analysis, children (p = 0.006) and older adults (p = 0.006) were found to have lower precision on the NVLT than adults; children (p = 0.002) and older adults (p = 0.003) had lower precision on the SVV test than adults; and children (p = 0.0009) and older adults (p = 0.0006) had lower precision on the SHV than adults. Only the NVLT and SVV showed a significant association in adults (r = 0.57; p = 0.02). Conclusion Children and older adults showed less accurate verticality perceptions and lower precision levels for spatial-number displacement and visual and proprioceptive verticalities than adults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字垂直线测试的规范数据:不同生命阶段和不同垂直测量的垂直精度比较
目的应用数值垂直线检验(NVLT)分析健康人群在不同生命阶段对垂直度的感知准确度和精度,并将NVLT结果与垂直度检验结果进行比较。方法本横断面研究涉及三个参与者组:(a) 50名儿童,(b) 50名成人,(c) 50名老年人。每个参与者都进行了三次测试:(a) NVLT, (b)主观视觉垂直(SVV)和(c)主观触觉垂直(SHV)。采用方差分析比较各年龄组的检验结果,采用Pearson相关系数评价各检验结果之间的相关性。结果在准确性分析中,儿童(p = 0.003)和老年人(p = 0.003)对NVLT的准确性低于成人;儿童在SVV测试上的准确性低于成人(p = 0.0008);儿童(p < 0.001)和老年人(p = 0.04)在SHV测试上的准确性低于成年人。在精度分析中,儿童(p = 0.006)和老年人(p = 0.006)的NVLT精度低于成人;儿童(p = 0.002)和老年人(p = 0.003)的SVV测试精度低于成人;儿童(p = 0.0009)和老年人(p = 0.0006)对SHV的准确性低于成人。在成人中,只有NVLT和SVV有显著相关性(r = 0.57;p = 0.02)。结论与成人相比,儿童和老年人的垂直度感知精度较低,空间数位移、视觉和本体感觉垂直度的感知精度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Balance and Communication
Hearing Balance and Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Comparison of quick speech-in-noise test and pure tone audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss Otolin-1 as a biomarker for the evaluation of the effectiveness of betahistine treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo The effect of hearing loss on balance in subjects with cognitive disorders Effect of auditory deprivation on threshold of sound lateralization Assessment of spatial acuity in typically developing children: a comparative study of sound-field and closed-field sound source identification paradigms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1