Comment on “Abscopal effect in the radio and immunotherapy”

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.3857/roj.2022.00017
François Fabi
{"title":"Comment on “Abscopal effect in the radio and immunotherapy”","authors":"François Fabi","doi":"10.3857/roj.2022.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"general understanding of the abscopal effect. As mentioned by the authors, while this phenomenon has been described for decades, the underlying molecular mechanisms allowing localized radiation to exert a disseminated anti-tumoral effect remains profoundly opaque. Although a multiplicity of pathways, effectors and mediators have been described, little work yielded results which could allow the clinical instrumentalization of this effect. In this review, the authors report the proposed unifying mechanism allowing distant effect of localized radiation therapy, which hinges on the activation of local CD T lymphocytes. These effector cells are exposed and primed to tumoral antigens and then exported to distant lesion sites, where they operate their cytolytic effect. The authors also mention that the generation of a large amount of de novo tumor antigens is responsible for robust immunogenicity, which is required to achieve potent activation of local leukocytes, as confirmed by others [2]. We do agree that tumor mutational burden (TMB) is usually considered as the primary predictor of neoantigen load, which is itself ontologically associated with tumoral immunoreactivity [3]. However, as underlined in pancreatic cancer [4] as well as other organ systems, distinct orthogonal signatures, like chemokine expression, can be used as robust, complementary proxies of the degree of tumoral T-cell infiltration and activation, even in the absence of high TMB or neoantigens. Alternatively, a variety of molecular signatures characteristic of T cell-inflamed phenotypes have been identified, with high T-cell infiltration generally predictive of good immunotherapeutic response. This, in turn, provides a plausibly robust prognosticator of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors [5]. In essence, it is suggested that tumoral immunogenicity, and response to immunotherapy, are not solely contingent on neoantigens and, by extension, TMB. Indeed, recent analysis of the phase 2 pan-cancer study (CA209-538) demonstrated no predictive value of TMB to response to combined PD-1/CTLA-4 (programmed cell death protein-1/cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4) checkpoint inhibition [6]. Rather, tumor infiltration by competent lymphocytes, which appears to be associated with different immunobiologically relevant signatures, could be a complementary, powerful metric of predicted therapeutic sensitivity to both radio and immunotherapies. We agree with the authors that identifying lesions most likely to generate systemic response to loComment on “Abscopal effect in the radio and immunotherapy”","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2022.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

general understanding of the abscopal effect. As mentioned by the authors, while this phenomenon has been described for decades, the underlying molecular mechanisms allowing localized radiation to exert a disseminated anti-tumoral effect remains profoundly opaque. Although a multiplicity of pathways, effectors and mediators have been described, little work yielded results which could allow the clinical instrumentalization of this effect. In this review, the authors report the proposed unifying mechanism allowing distant effect of localized radiation therapy, which hinges on the activation of local CD T lymphocytes. These effector cells are exposed and primed to tumoral antigens and then exported to distant lesion sites, where they operate their cytolytic effect. The authors also mention that the generation of a large amount of de novo tumor antigens is responsible for robust immunogenicity, which is required to achieve potent activation of local leukocytes, as confirmed by others [2]. We do agree that tumor mutational burden (TMB) is usually considered as the primary predictor of neoantigen load, which is itself ontologically associated with tumoral immunoreactivity [3]. However, as underlined in pancreatic cancer [4] as well as other organ systems, distinct orthogonal signatures, like chemokine expression, can be used as robust, complementary proxies of the degree of tumoral T-cell infiltration and activation, even in the absence of high TMB or neoantigens. Alternatively, a variety of molecular signatures characteristic of T cell-inflamed phenotypes have been identified, with high T-cell infiltration generally predictive of good immunotherapeutic response. This, in turn, provides a plausibly robust prognosticator of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors [5]. In essence, it is suggested that tumoral immunogenicity, and response to immunotherapy, are not solely contingent on neoantigens and, by extension, TMB. Indeed, recent analysis of the phase 2 pan-cancer study (CA209-538) demonstrated no predictive value of TMB to response to combined PD-1/CTLA-4 (programmed cell death protein-1/cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4) checkpoint inhibition [6]. Rather, tumor infiltration by competent lymphocytes, which appears to be associated with different immunobiologically relevant signatures, could be a complementary, powerful metric of predicted therapeutic sensitivity to both radio and immunotherapies. We agree with the authors that identifying lesions most likely to generate systemic response to loComment on “Abscopal effect in the radio and immunotherapy”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“放射与免疫治疗中的抽象化效应”述评
对抽象效应的一般认识。正如作者所提到的,虽然这种现象已经被描述了几十年,但允许局部辐射发挥弥散性抗肿瘤作用的潜在分子机制仍然非常不清楚。虽然已经描述了多种途径,效应剂和介质,但很少有工作产生的结果可以允许这种作用的临床仪器化。在这篇综述中,作者报告了允许局部放射治疗的远程效果的统一机制,这取决于局部CD T淋巴细胞的激活。这些效应细胞暴露于肿瘤抗原,然后输出到远处病变部位,在那里它们发挥细胞溶解作用。作者还提到,大量新生肿瘤抗原的产生是强大的免疫原性的原因,正如其他人所证实的那样,这是实现局部白细胞有效激活所必需的。我们确实同意肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)通常被认为是新抗原负荷的主要预测因子,其本身在本体论上与肿瘤免疫反应性[3]相关。然而,正如在胰腺癌[4]和其他器官系统中所强调的那样,即使在没有高TMB或新抗原的情况下,不同的正交特征,如趋化因子表达,也可以作为肿瘤t细胞浸润和激活程度的稳健、互补的替代指标。另外,已经确定了T细胞炎症表型的各种分子特征,高T细胞浸润通常预示着良好的免疫治疗反应。这反过来又提供了对免疫检查点抑制剂[5]反应的可靠预测。本质上,这表明肿瘤的免疫原性和对免疫治疗的反应并不仅仅取决于新抗原,进而取决于TMB。事实上,最近对2期泛癌症研究(CA209-538)的分析表明,TMB对PD-1/CTLA-4(程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1/细胞毒性T淋巴细胞抗原-4)检查点抑制[6]的反应没有预测价值。相反,似乎与不同免疫生物学相关特征相关的活性淋巴细胞的肿瘤浸润可能是预测放射治疗和免疫治疗敏感性的补充、有力指标。我们同意作者的观点,即识别最可能产生系统性反应的病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Implementing high-dose rate surface mould brachytherapy for carcinoma of eyelid: a practical approach and weekly review The effects of high-dose radiation therapy on bone: a scoping review Validation of Combs prognostic scoring system in Indian recurrent glioma patients treated with re-radiation Long-term toxicities after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with or without total body irradiation: a population-based study in Korea Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1