Disaster response: a review of the April 26, 1991, Kansas tornado.

K. Prilliman, G. Solis, M. Swartz, K. Conley
{"title":"Disaster response: a review of the April 26, 1991, Kansas tornado.","authors":"K. Prilliman, G. Solis, M. Swartz, K. Conley","doi":"10.5555/URI:PII:009917679390182S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the evening of April 26, 1991, between the hours of 2:30 PM and 11:30 PM, 11 tornadoes swept across 22 counties in Kansas. The most violent of these storms left a 75.mile path of death and destruction during the 70 minutes it was on the ground. According to the National Severe Storms Forecast Center, these tornadoes rated as an F5 on the Fujita Scale. The Fujita Scale rates tornadoes from FO to F5; F5 is the most severe. An F5 tornado has a rotational speed of 261 to 318 mph, with the power to hurl automobile-sized objects at 100 mph and the force to disintegrate homes (Figures 1 and a).’ As a result of the tornadoes, more than 5@l homes were destroyed, with damages estimated at $250 million. More than 1400 persons were left homeless, more than 200 sustained significant injuries, and 20 died.2 Wichita, the closest urban area, became the hub for patient transports from Harper, Sedqwick, and Butler counties. Wichita’s three major trauma centers and one smaller community hospital serve a community of approximately 350,000. These facilities worked cooperatively to ensure appropriate medical care during the disaster and collaborated afterward on this article to share the lessons learned.","PeriodicalId":15691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association","volume":"77 1","pages":"209-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5555/URI:PII:009917679390182S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

On the evening of April 26, 1991, between the hours of 2:30 PM and 11:30 PM, 11 tornadoes swept across 22 counties in Kansas. The most violent of these storms left a 75.mile path of death and destruction during the 70 minutes it was on the ground. According to the National Severe Storms Forecast Center, these tornadoes rated as an F5 on the Fujita Scale. The Fujita Scale rates tornadoes from FO to F5; F5 is the most severe. An F5 tornado has a rotational speed of 261 to 318 mph, with the power to hurl automobile-sized objects at 100 mph and the force to disintegrate homes (Figures 1 and a).’ As a result of the tornadoes, more than 5@l homes were destroyed, with damages estimated at $250 million. More than 1400 persons were left homeless, more than 200 sustained significant injuries, and 20 died.2 Wichita, the closest urban area, became the hub for patient transports from Harper, Sedqwick, and Butler counties. Wichita’s three major trauma centers and one smaller community hospital serve a community of approximately 350,000. These facilities worked cooperatively to ensure appropriate medical care during the disaster and collaborated afterward on this article to share the lessons learned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灾难应对:1991年4月26日堪萨斯州龙卷风的回顾。
1991年4月26日晚,在下午2:30到11:30之间,11个龙卷风席卷了堪萨斯州的22个县。其中最猛烈的风暴在登陆地面的70分钟内留下了75英里的死亡和破坏路径。据国家强风暴预报中心称,这些龙卷风被评为藤田级F5级。藤田等级将龙卷风的等级从FO到F5;F5是最严重的。F5级龙卷风的转速为每小时261至318英里,其威力可将汽车大小的物体以每小时100英里的速度甩出,并能摧毁房屋(图1和a)。龙卷风造成超过5@l座房屋被毁,损失估计达2.5亿美元。1400多人无家可归,200多人受重伤,20人死亡威奇托是最近的市区,成为哈珀、塞德克威克和巴特勒县运送病人的中心。威奇托的三个主要创伤中心和一个较小的社区医院为大约35万人口的社区提供服务。这些机构通力合作,确保在灾难期间提供适当的医疗服务,并在灾难发生后合作撰写本文,分享经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What would you do? Village Contamination in Adult Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Innovating Emergency Nursing Tools and Technology: Work Design for Quality and Patient Safety. Weight! Weight! … Don't Tell Me!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1