Using baseline logic to determine when to change phases within single case experimental designs: Fail safe k values and statistical power

L. Barnard‐Brak, D. Richman
{"title":"Using baseline logic to determine when to change phases within single case experimental designs: Fail safe k values and statistical power","authors":"L. Barnard‐Brak, D. Richman","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2023.2165400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When using baseline logic with single case experimental designs (SCEDs), one critical step involves collecting enough treatment data points, relative to the number of data points in the previous baseline phase, to set the occasion for relatively equivalent samples of the target behavior across phases. The fail safe k metric for SCED data provides a robust metric to complement visual inspection of graphed data to determine if enough sessions were conducted within a phase of the SCED to adequately predict the level, trend, and stability of the data path if more sessions were conducted in that phase. There was a strong relationship between fail safe k values and statistical power to detect differences in the dependent variable across phases relative to different criteria for estimating treatment effect sizes. Both quantifications suggested that decision rules for changing phases are associated with achieving an acceptable level of statistical power but with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment effects.","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"1983 1","pages":"77 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2023.2165400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract When using baseline logic with single case experimental designs (SCEDs), one critical step involves collecting enough treatment data points, relative to the number of data points in the previous baseline phase, to set the occasion for relatively equivalent samples of the target behavior across phases. The fail safe k metric for SCED data provides a robust metric to complement visual inspection of graphed data to determine if enough sessions were conducted within a phase of the SCED to adequately predict the level, trend, and stability of the data path if more sessions were conducted in that phase. There was a strong relationship between fail safe k values and statistical power to detect differences in the dependent variable across phases relative to different criteria for estimating treatment effect sizes. Both quantifications suggested that decision rules for changing phases are associated with achieving an acceptable level of statistical power but with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基线逻辑来确定何时在单例实验设计中改变阶段:故障安全k值和统计功率
在单例实验设计(SCEDs)中使用基线逻辑时,一个关键步骤是收集足够的治疗数据点(相对于前一个基线阶段的数据点数量),以便为不同阶段的目标行为的相对等效样本设置场合。SCED数据的故障安全k指标提供了一个强大的指标,以补充图形数据的目视检查,以确定在SCED的一个阶段内是否进行了足够的会话,以便在该阶段进行更多会话时充分预测数据路径的水平、趋势和稳定性。失效安全k值与统计能力之间存在很强的关系,以检测相对于估计治疗效应大小的不同标准的各阶段因变量的差异。两种量化都表明,变化阶段的决策规则与达到可接受的统计能力水平有关,但在检测治疗效果方面具有不同程度的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.
期刊最新文献
Illusions of literacy in nonspeaking autistic people: a response to Jaswal, Lampi & Stockwell, 2024 Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder with marked ingressive speech: a prospective case study Initial results of single-case design study indicate parent training on naturalistic behavioral intervention conducted via telehealth improves parent fidelity and collateral child mands, tacts and intraverbals Preliminary evidence a behavior chain interruption strategy is a promising approach for teaching functional mands to individuals with deaf-blindness and an intellectual disability Can message-passing anecdotes tell us anything about the validity of RPM and S2C?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1