{"title":"Using baseline logic to determine when to change phases within single case experimental designs: Fail safe k values and statistical power","authors":"L. Barnard‐Brak, D. Richman","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2023.2165400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When using baseline logic with single case experimental designs (SCEDs), one critical step involves collecting enough treatment data points, relative to the number of data points in the previous baseline phase, to set the occasion for relatively equivalent samples of the target behavior across phases. The fail safe k metric for SCED data provides a robust metric to complement visual inspection of graphed data to determine if enough sessions were conducted within a phase of the SCED to adequately predict the level, trend, and stability of the data path if more sessions were conducted in that phase. There was a strong relationship between fail safe k values and statistical power to detect differences in the dependent variable across phases relative to different criteria for estimating treatment effect sizes. Both quantifications suggested that decision rules for changing phases are associated with achieving an acceptable level of statistical power but with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment effects.","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"1983 1","pages":"77 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2023.2165400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract When using baseline logic with single case experimental designs (SCEDs), one critical step involves collecting enough treatment data points, relative to the number of data points in the previous baseline phase, to set the occasion for relatively equivalent samples of the target behavior across phases. The fail safe k metric for SCED data provides a robust metric to complement visual inspection of graphed data to determine if enough sessions were conducted within a phase of the SCED to adequately predict the level, trend, and stability of the data path if more sessions were conducted in that phase. There was a strong relationship between fail safe k values and statistical power to detect differences in the dependent variable across phases relative to different criteria for estimating treatment effect sizes. Both quantifications suggested that decision rules for changing phases are associated with achieving an acceptable level of statistical power but with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity for detecting treatment effects.
期刊介绍:
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.