Fracture Height Prediction Model Utilizing Openhole Logs, Mechanical Models, and Temperature Cooldown Analysis with Machine Learning Algorithms

AbdulMuqtadir Khan, Abdullah Binziad, Abdullah Subaii, D. Bannikov, Maksim Ponomarev, Sergey Parkhonyuk
{"title":"Fracture Height Prediction Model Utilizing Openhole Logs, Mechanical Models, and Temperature Cooldown Analysis with Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"AbdulMuqtadir Khan, Abdullah Binziad, Abdullah Subaii, D. Bannikov, Maksim Ponomarev, Sergey Parkhonyuk","doi":"10.2118/207975-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Vertical wells require diagnostic techniques after minifrac pumping to interpret fracture height growth. This interpretation provides vital input to hydraulic fracturing redesign workflows. The temperature log is the most widely used technique to determine fracture height through cooldown analysis. A data science approach is proposed to leverage available measurements, automate the interpretation process, and enhance operational efficiency while keeping confidence in the fracturing design.\n Data from 55 wells were ingested to establish proof of concept.The selected geomechanical rock texture parameters were based on the fracturing theory of net-pressure-controlled height growth. Interpreted fracture height from input temperature cooldown analysis was merged with the structured dataset. The dataset was constructed at a high vertical depth of resolution of 0.5 to 1 ft. Openhole log data such as gamma-ray and bulk density helped to characterize the rock type, and calculated mechanical properties from acoustic logs such as in-situ stress and Young's modulus characterize the fracture geometry development. Moreover, injection rate, volume, and net pressure during the calibration treatment affect the fracture height growth.\n A machine learning (ML) workflow was applied to multiple openhole log parameters, which were integrated with minifrac calibration parameters along with the varying depth of the reservoir. The 55 wells datasets with a cumulative 120,000 rows were divided into training and testing with a ratio of 80:20. A comparative algorithm study was conducted on the test set with nine algorithms, and CatBoost showed the best results with an RMSE of 4.13 followed by Random Forest with 4.25. CatBoost models utilize both categorical and numerical data. Stress, gamma-ray, and bulk density parameters affected the fracture height analyzed from the post-fracturing temperature logs. Following successful implementation in the pilot phase, the model can be extended to horizontal wells to validate predictions from commercial simulators where stress calculations were unreliable or where stress did not entirely reflect changes in rock type.\n By coupling the geometry measurement technology with data analysis, a useful automated model was successfully developed to enhance operational efficiency without compromising any part of the workflow. The advanced algorithm can be used in any field where precise fracture placement of a hydraulic fracture contributes directly to production potential. Also, the model can play a critical role in cube development to optimize lateral landing and lateral density for exploration fields.","PeriodicalId":10959,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, November 17, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, November 17, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207975-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Vertical wells require diagnostic techniques after minifrac pumping to interpret fracture height growth. This interpretation provides vital input to hydraulic fracturing redesign workflows. The temperature log is the most widely used technique to determine fracture height through cooldown analysis. A data science approach is proposed to leverage available measurements, automate the interpretation process, and enhance operational efficiency while keeping confidence in the fracturing design. Data from 55 wells were ingested to establish proof of concept.The selected geomechanical rock texture parameters were based on the fracturing theory of net-pressure-controlled height growth. Interpreted fracture height from input temperature cooldown analysis was merged with the structured dataset. The dataset was constructed at a high vertical depth of resolution of 0.5 to 1 ft. Openhole log data such as gamma-ray and bulk density helped to characterize the rock type, and calculated mechanical properties from acoustic logs such as in-situ stress and Young's modulus characterize the fracture geometry development. Moreover, injection rate, volume, and net pressure during the calibration treatment affect the fracture height growth. A machine learning (ML) workflow was applied to multiple openhole log parameters, which were integrated with minifrac calibration parameters along with the varying depth of the reservoir. The 55 wells datasets with a cumulative 120,000 rows were divided into training and testing with a ratio of 80:20. A comparative algorithm study was conducted on the test set with nine algorithms, and CatBoost showed the best results with an RMSE of 4.13 followed by Random Forest with 4.25. CatBoost models utilize both categorical and numerical data. Stress, gamma-ray, and bulk density parameters affected the fracture height analyzed from the post-fracturing temperature logs. Following successful implementation in the pilot phase, the model can be extended to horizontal wells to validate predictions from commercial simulators where stress calculations were unreliable or where stress did not entirely reflect changes in rock type. By coupling the geometry measurement technology with data analysis, a useful automated model was successfully developed to enhance operational efficiency without compromising any part of the workflow. The advanced algorithm can be used in any field where precise fracture placement of a hydraulic fracture contributes directly to production potential. Also, the model can play a critical role in cube development to optimize lateral landing and lateral density for exploration fields.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用裸眼测井、力学模型和机器学习算法的温度冷却分析,建立裂缝高度预测模型
直井需要在微型压裂泵送后使用诊断技术来解释裂缝高度的增长。该解释为水力压裂重新设计工作流程提供了重要的输入。温度测井是通过冷却期分析来确定裂缝高度最广泛使用的技术。提出了一种数据科学方法,利用现有的测量数据,自动化解释过程,提高作业效率,同时保持对压裂设计的信心。研究人员收集了55口井的数据,以验证这一概念。选取的地质力学岩石结构参数基于净压力控制高度增长的压裂理论。从输入温度冷却分析中解释的裂缝高度与结构化数据集合并。该数据集建立在0.5至1英尺的高垂直深度,裸眼测井数据(如伽马射线和体积密度)有助于表征岩石类型,并通过声学测井(如地应力和杨氏模量)计算力学特性,表征裂缝的几何形态发展。此外,在校正处理过程中,注入速度、体积和净压力都会影响裂缝高度的增长。将机器学习(ML)工作流程应用于多个裸眼测井参数,这些参数与随储层深度变化的minifrac校准参数集成在一起。55口井的数据集(累计12万行)被分成训练和测试两部分,比例为80:20。在9种算法的测试集上进行算法对比研究,CatBoost的RMSE为4.13,效果最好,其次是Random Forest, RMSE为4.25。CatBoost模型同时利用分类和数值数据。根据压裂后的温度测井分析,应力、伽马射线和体积密度参数会影响裂缝高度。在试验阶段成功实施后,该模型可以扩展到水平井,以验证商业模拟器的预测,在应力计算不可靠或应力不能完全反映岩石类型变化的情况下。通过将几何测量技术与数据分析相结合,成功开发了一个有用的自动化模型,在不影响工作流程任何部分的情况下提高了操作效率。这种先进的算法可用于水力裂缝的精确压裂位置直接影响生产潜力的任何领域。此外,该模型还可以在立方体开发中发挥关键作用,以优化勘探领域的横向着陆点和横向密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Unconventional Resources Opportunities in the Middle East Tethyan Petroleum System in a Transfer Learning Context Block 61 Drilling Fluids Optimization Journey High Resolution Reservoir Simulator Driven Custom Scripts as the Enabler for Solving Reservoir to Surface Network Coupling Challenges Pre-Engineered Standardized Turbomachinery Solutions: A Strategic Approach to Lean Project Management Using Active and Passive Near-Field Hydrophones to Image the Near-Surface in Ultra-Shallow Waters Offshore Abu Dhabi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1