Does enterprise social media use in the post-acceptance stage improve employee autonomy? An information processing perspective

Pengzhen Yin, Wen Wang, Chuan Wang, Liang Liang
{"title":"Does enterprise social media use in the post-acceptance stage improve employee autonomy? An information processing perspective","authors":"Pengzhen Yin, Wen Wang, Chuan Wang, Liang Liang","doi":"10.1108/imds-10-2022-0656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWith the prevalence of enterprise social media (ESM), this study examines how the innovative and routine ESM use behaviors in the post-acceptance stage influence the quality and quantity dimensions of information processing (i.e. information equality and information overload), subsequently affecting employee autonomy grounded in the digital information management theoretical (DIMT) framework. This study further explores the moderating effects of communication visibility on the relationships between employee autonomy and each of the two information processing factors.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed theoretical model was empirically validated using survey data of 266 knowledge workers that use ESM in a hybrid working context.FindingsThe results demonstrate that innovative and routine ESM use have different impacts on the quality and quantity dimensions of information processing, and information equality (quality dimension) improves employee autonomy as expected, but, surprisingly, information overloads (quantity dimension) as well. ESM communication visibility positively moderates the relationship between employee autonomy and each dimension of information processing.Originality/valuePrior studies on ESM use widely focused on ESM's positive and negative outcomes and the mechanisms from the perspectives of employees' psychological and cognitive reactions. How ESM use behaviors in the post-acceptance stage empower employee autonomy and allow organizations to leverage the organizations' information technology (IT) investments remains unclear. Drawing on the information processing perspective, this study provides a novel angle to examine how to leverage IT values that stem from ESM use by considering the complementary roles of active and passive information processing.","PeriodicalId":13427,"journal":{"name":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","volume":"36 1","pages":"2055-2078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-10-2022-0656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeWith the prevalence of enterprise social media (ESM), this study examines how the innovative and routine ESM use behaviors in the post-acceptance stage influence the quality and quantity dimensions of information processing (i.e. information equality and information overload), subsequently affecting employee autonomy grounded in the digital information management theoretical (DIMT) framework. This study further explores the moderating effects of communication visibility on the relationships between employee autonomy and each of the two information processing factors.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed theoretical model was empirically validated using survey data of 266 knowledge workers that use ESM in a hybrid working context.FindingsThe results demonstrate that innovative and routine ESM use have different impacts on the quality and quantity dimensions of information processing, and information equality (quality dimension) improves employee autonomy as expected, but, surprisingly, information overloads (quantity dimension) as well. ESM communication visibility positively moderates the relationship between employee autonomy and each dimension of information processing.Originality/valuePrior studies on ESM use widely focused on ESM's positive and negative outcomes and the mechanisms from the perspectives of employees' psychological and cognitive reactions. How ESM use behaviors in the post-acceptance stage empower employee autonomy and allow organizations to leverage the organizations' information technology (IT) investments remains unclear. Drawing on the information processing perspective, this study provides a novel angle to examine how to leverage IT values that stem from ESM use by considering the complementary roles of active and passive information processing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业在接受后阶段使用社交媒体是否提高了员工的自主性?信息处理视角
随着企业社交媒体(ESM)的普及,本研究在数字信息管理理论(DIMT)框架下,探讨了接受后阶段的创新和常规ESM使用行为如何影响信息处理的质量和数量维度(即信息平等和信息过载),进而影响员工的自主性。本研究进一步探讨了沟通可见性对员工自主性与两个信息加工因素之间关系的调节作用。设计/方法/方法采用在混合工作环境中使用ESM的266名知识工作者的调查数据对提出的理论模型进行了实证验证。研究结果表明,创新和常规的ESM使用对信息处理的质量和数量维度有不同的影响,信息平等(质量维度)如预期的那样提高了员工的自主性,但令人惊讶的是,信息超载(数量维度)也提高了员工的自主性。ESM沟通可见性正向调节员工自主性与信息处理各维度之间的关系。以往对ESM的研究大多从员工的心理和认知反应角度出发,关注ESM的积极和消极结果及其作用机制。ESM如何在接受后阶段使用行为赋予员工自主权,并允许组织利用组织的信息技术(IT)投资,目前还不清楚。从信息处理的角度出发,本研究提供了一个新的角度,通过考虑主动和被动信息处理的互补作用,来研究如何利用来自ESM使用的IT价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big data analytics capability in building supply chain resilience: the moderating effect of innovation-focused complementary assets Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on customer behavior in live streaming: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment How doctor image features engage health science short video viewers? Investigating the age and gender bias The impact of enterprise social media usage on employee creativity: a self-regulation perspective Implementation of information and communication technologies in fruit and vegetable supply chain: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1