Plan B: a buffered memory model for Java

Delphine Demange, Vincent Laporte, Lei Zhao, S. Jagannathan, David Pichardie, J. Vitek
{"title":"Plan B: a buffered memory model for Java","authors":"Delphine Demange, Vincent Laporte, Lei Zhao, S. Jagannathan, David Pichardie, J. Vitek","doi":"10.1145/2429069.2429110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in verification have made it possible to envision trusted implementations of real-world languages. Java with its type-safety and fully specified semantics would appear to be an ideal candidate; yet, the complexity of the translation steps used in production virtual machines have made it a challenging target for verifying compiler technology. One of Java's key innovations, its memory model, poses significant obstacles to such an endeavor. The Java Memory Model is an ambitious attempt at specifying the behavior of multithreaded programs in a portable, hardware agnostic, way. While experts have an intuitive grasp of the properties that the model should enjoy, the specification is complex and not well-suited for integration within a verifying compiler infrastructure. Moreover, the specification is given in an axiomatic style that is distant from the intuitive reordering-based reasonings traditionally used to justify or rule out behaviors, and ill suited to the kind of operational reasoning one would expect to employ in a compiler. This paper takes a step back, and introduces a Buffered Memory Model (BMM) for Java. We choose a pragmatic point in the design space sacrificing generality in favor of a model that is fully characterized in terms of the reorderings it allows, amenable to formal reasoning, and which can be efficiently applied to a specific hardware family, namely x86 multiprocessors. Although the BMM restricts the reorderings compilers are allowed to perform, it serves as the key enabling device to achieving a verification pathway from bytecode to machine instructions. Despite its restrictions, we show that it is backwards compatible with the Java Memory Model and that it does not cripple performance on TSO architectures.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"1 1","pages":"329-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2429069.2429110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Recent advances in verification have made it possible to envision trusted implementations of real-world languages. Java with its type-safety and fully specified semantics would appear to be an ideal candidate; yet, the complexity of the translation steps used in production virtual machines have made it a challenging target for verifying compiler technology. One of Java's key innovations, its memory model, poses significant obstacles to such an endeavor. The Java Memory Model is an ambitious attempt at specifying the behavior of multithreaded programs in a portable, hardware agnostic, way. While experts have an intuitive grasp of the properties that the model should enjoy, the specification is complex and not well-suited for integration within a verifying compiler infrastructure. Moreover, the specification is given in an axiomatic style that is distant from the intuitive reordering-based reasonings traditionally used to justify or rule out behaviors, and ill suited to the kind of operational reasoning one would expect to employ in a compiler. This paper takes a step back, and introduces a Buffered Memory Model (BMM) for Java. We choose a pragmatic point in the design space sacrificing generality in favor of a model that is fully characterized in terms of the reorderings it allows, amenable to formal reasoning, and which can be efficiently applied to a specific hardware family, namely x86 multiprocessors. Although the BMM restricts the reorderings compilers are allowed to perform, it serves as the key enabling device to achieving a verification pathway from bytecode to machine instructions. Despite its restrictions, we show that it is backwards compatible with the Java Memory Model and that it does not cripple performance on TSO architectures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
方案B: Java的缓冲内存模型
验证方面的最新进展已经使设想真实世界语言的可信实现成为可能。具有类型安全和完全指定语义的Java似乎是一个理想的候选者;然而,生产虚拟机中使用的翻译步骤的复杂性使得验证编译器技术成为一个具有挑战性的目标。Java的关键创新之一,它的内存模型,给这种努力带来了巨大的障碍。Java内存模型是一项雄心勃勃的尝试,旨在以可移植的、与硬件无关的方式指定多线程程序的行为。虽然专家对模型应该享有的属性有直观的把握,但是规范是复杂的,并且不适合在验证编译器基础结构中集成。此外,该规范以一种公理的风格给出,与传统上用于证明或排除行为的基于重新排序的直观推理相去甚远,并且不适合期望在编译器中使用的那种操作推理。本文退一步介绍了Java的缓冲内存模型(BMM)。我们在设计空间中选择了一个实用的点,牺牲了通用性,以支持一个模型,该模型在其允许的重新排序方面具有完全的特征,符合形式推理,并且可以有效地应用于特定的硬件系列,即x86多处理器。尽管BMM限制了编译器允许执行的重排序,但它是实现从字节码到机器指令的验证路径的关键启用设备。尽管有其限制,但我们证明了它与Java内存模型向后兼容,并且不会削弱TSO体系结构上的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Session details: Verified systems Session details: Semantic models 2 Session details: Program analysis 3 Session details: Program analysis 1 Session details: Type system design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1