Shaping the future of distance learning in teacher education: MOOCS during COVID-19

Q3 Social Sciences Perspectives in Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.18820/2519593x/pie.v40.i1.15
S. Donitsa-Schmidt, R. Ramot, Beverley Topaz
{"title":"Shaping the future of distance learning in teacher education: MOOCS during COVID-19","authors":"S. Donitsa-Schmidt, R. Ramot, Beverley Topaz","doi":"10.18820/2519593x/pie.v40.i1.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current research aimed to investigate the perceptions of pre-service students regarding the usefulness and contribution of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in initial teacher education programmes, particularly in times of emergency. Participants comprised 202 second-career pre-service students who enrolled in alternative teacher education programmes during COVID-19. On average, students studied 4-5 courses that were a mandatory component of their programme. Students completed an anonymous, voluntary, self-report questionnaire at the end of their studies. Findings show that students found the MOOCs to be a good teaching model. They were satisfied with their MOOC studies and reported their learning experience to be significantly more rewarding and positive than lonely and stressful. Learning outcomes were ranked high. In terms of the usefulness and contribution of the MOOCs, three student profiles were identified. The \"zealous\" type is enthralled by the merits of MOOCs including their impact on their future teaching, professional development and lifelong learning. The \"guarded\" type perceives only some of the MOOCs' attributes as positive, primarily convenience, independent learning and studying a variety of courses with well-known experts. The \"pragmatic\" type is highly opportunistic and utilitarian, perceiving MOOCs only as a means to overcoming barriers of time and place. Finally, students who study more MOOCs perceive them as having a positive impact on their future teaching, acknowledge their importance in times of crisis and opt for including a higher proportion of MOOCs in initial teacher education programmes. The favourable impact of studying several MOOCs as part of an initial teacher education programme is one of the main findings of the current research highlighting the importance of students experiencing several such courses during their pre-service studies.","PeriodicalId":19864,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Education","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593x/pie.v40.i1.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The current research aimed to investigate the perceptions of pre-service students regarding the usefulness and contribution of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in initial teacher education programmes, particularly in times of emergency. Participants comprised 202 second-career pre-service students who enrolled in alternative teacher education programmes during COVID-19. On average, students studied 4-5 courses that were a mandatory component of their programme. Students completed an anonymous, voluntary, self-report questionnaire at the end of their studies. Findings show that students found the MOOCs to be a good teaching model. They were satisfied with their MOOC studies and reported their learning experience to be significantly more rewarding and positive than lonely and stressful. Learning outcomes were ranked high. In terms of the usefulness and contribution of the MOOCs, three student profiles were identified. The "zealous" type is enthralled by the merits of MOOCs including their impact on their future teaching, professional development and lifelong learning. The "guarded" type perceives only some of the MOOCs' attributes as positive, primarily convenience, independent learning and studying a variety of courses with well-known experts. The "pragmatic" type is highly opportunistic and utilitarian, perceiving MOOCs only as a means to overcoming barriers of time and place. Finally, students who study more MOOCs perceive them as having a positive impact on their future teaching, acknowledge their importance in times of crisis and opt for including a higher proportion of MOOCs in initial teacher education programmes. The favourable impact of studying several MOOCs as part of an initial teacher education programme is one of the main findings of the current research highlighting the importance of students experiencing several such courses during their pre-service studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塑造教师教育中远程学习的未来:COVID-19期间的mooc
当前的研究旨在调查职前学生对大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)在初始教师教育计划中的有用性和贡献的看法,特别是在紧急情况下。参与者包括202名第二职业职前学生,他们在COVID-19期间参加了替代教师教育项目。学生们平均要学习4-5门必修课程。学生们在学习结束时完成了一份匿名、自愿、自我报告的调查问卷。调查结果表明,学生认为mooc是一种很好的教学模式。他们对自己的MOOC学习感到满意,并报告说,与孤独和压力相比,他们的学习经历更有意义、更积极。学习成果排名靠前。就mooc的有用性和贡献而言,确定了三种学生概况。“热心”类型的人被mooc的优点所吸引,包括它们对他们未来的教学、专业发展和终身学习的影响。“谨慎型”的人只认为mooc的一些优点是积极的,主要是方便、自主学习和跟随知名专家学习各种课程。“实用主义”类型是高度机会主义和功利主义的,他们只把mooc看作是克服时间和地点障碍的一种手段。最后,学习更多mooc课程的学生认为它们对他们未来的教学有积极影响,承认它们在危机时期的重要性,并选择在初始教师教育课程中纳入更高比例的mooc课程。作为初始教师教育计划的一部分,学习几门mooc课程的有利影响是当前研究的主要发现之一,该研究强调了学生在职前学习期间体验几门此类课程的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Education
Perspectives in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Education is a professional, refereed journal, which encourages submission of previously unpublished articles on contemporary educational issues. As a journal that represents a variety of cross-disciplinary interests, both theoretical and practical, it seeks to stimulate debates on a wide range of topics. PIE invites manuscripts employing innovative qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches including (but not limited to) ethnographic observation and interviewing, grounded theory, life history, case study, curriculum analysis and critique, policy studies, ethnomethodology, social and educational critique, phenomenology, deconstruction, and genealogy. Debates on epistemology, methodology, or ethics, from a range of perspectives including postpositivism, interpretivism, constructivism, critical theory, feminism, post-modernism are also invited. PIE seeks to stimulate important dialogues and intellectual exchange on education and democratic transition with respect to schools, colleges, non-governmental organisations, universities and technikons in South Africa and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Grade R teachers’ perceptions concerning parental participation in early literacy development in a disadvantaged context in the Western Cape An exploration of African-student agency: Placing students from historically disadvantaged communities at the centre A systematic review of the implications for teaching, learning and assessment at South African universities after the Covid-19 pandemic Self-Assessment Inclusion Scale (SAIS): a tool for measuring inclusive competence and sensitivity Investigating nomophobia as a possible mental health disorder in Gauteng public schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1