Fortification, mining, and charcoal production: landscape history at the abandoned medieval settlement of Hohenwalde at the Faule Pfütze (Saxony, Eastern Ore Mountains)

J. Tolksdorf, Matthias Schubert, Frank Schröder, L. Petr, Christoph Herbig, Petr Kočár, Mathias Bertuch, Christiane Hemker
{"title":"Fortification, mining, and charcoal production: landscape history at the abandoned medieval settlement of Hohenwalde at the Faule Pfütze (Saxony, Eastern Ore Mountains)","authors":"J. Tolksdorf, Matthias Schubert, Frank Schröder, L. Petr, Christoph Herbig, Petr Kočár, Mathias Bertuch, Christiane Hemker","doi":"10.5194/EGQSJ-67-73-2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Geoarchaeological reconstructions of land-use changes may help to reveal\ndriving cultural factors and incentives behind these processes and relate\nthem to supra-regional economic and political developments. This is\nparticularly true in the context of complete abandonment of a settlement.\nHere we present a case study from the site of Faule Pfütze, a small\ncatchment in the Eastern Ore Mountains (Saxony). The historical record of\nthis site is confined to the report of a settlement called Hohenwalde in\n1404 CE and two later references to the then-abandoned settlement in 1492 and\n1524 CE in this area. Combined geoarchaeological studies allowed for the\nreconstruction of several phases of land use. While a first phase of alluvial\nsedimentation occurred during the late 12th century, archaeological\nevidence for a permanent settlement is absent during this period. The onset\nof settlement activity is identified during the late 14th century and\nincluded a hitherto unknown massive stone building. Mining features are\npresent nearby and are dated to the early 15th century. The local\npalynological record shows evidence for reforestation during the\nmid 15th century and thereby corroborates the time of abandonment\nindicated by written sources. These processes are discussed in the context of\na local political conflict (Dohna Feud) leading to the redistribution of\nproperties and the development of a mining economy during this time. Later\nland use from the mid 16th century onwards appears restricted to\ncharcoal production, probably in the context of smelting works operating in\nnearby Schmiedeberg as indicated by rising lead concentrations in the\nalluvial record.\n","PeriodicalId":11420,"journal":{"name":"E&G Quaternary Science Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E&G Quaternary Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/EGQSJ-67-73-2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract. Geoarchaeological reconstructions of land-use changes may help to reveal driving cultural factors and incentives behind these processes and relate them to supra-regional economic and political developments. This is particularly true in the context of complete abandonment of a settlement. Here we present a case study from the site of Faule Pfütze, a small catchment in the Eastern Ore Mountains (Saxony). The historical record of this site is confined to the report of a settlement called Hohenwalde in 1404 CE and two later references to the then-abandoned settlement in 1492 and 1524 CE in this area. Combined geoarchaeological studies allowed for the reconstruction of several phases of land use. While a first phase of alluvial sedimentation occurred during the late 12th century, archaeological evidence for a permanent settlement is absent during this period. The onset of settlement activity is identified during the late 14th century and included a hitherto unknown massive stone building. Mining features are present nearby and are dated to the early 15th century. The local palynological record shows evidence for reforestation during the mid 15th century and thereby corroborates the time of abandonment indicated by written sources. These processes are discussed in the context of a local political conflict (Dohna Feud) leading to the redistribution of properties and the development of a mining economy during this time. Later land use from the mid 16th century onwards appears restricted to charcoal production, probably in the context of smelting works operating in nearby Schmiedeberg as indicated by rising lead concentrations in the alluvial record.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
防御工事,采矿和木炭生产:在faulle pftze(萨克森州,东部矿石山脉)废弃的中世纪定居点Hohenwalde的景观历史
摘要土地利用变化的地质考古重建可能有助于揭示这些过程背后的驱动文化因素和激励因素,并将其与超区域经济和政治发展联系起来。在完全放弃解决方案的情况下尤其如此。在这里,我们提出了一个案例研究,从断裂ppftze,一个小集水区在东矿石山(萨克森州)的网站。该遗址的历史记录仅限于公元1404年一个名为霍恩瓦尔德(Hohenwalde)的定居点的报告,以及后来两次提到该地区在公元1492年和1524年被遗弃的定居点。综合地质考古研究允许土地利用的几个阶段的建设。虽然冲积沉积的第一阶段发生在12世纪晚期,但在这一时期没有永久性定居点的考古证据。定居活动的开始是在14世纪晚期,其中包括一座迄今为止未知的大型石头建筑。附近有采矿设施,可追溯到15世纪初。当地孢粉记录显示了15世纪中期重新造林的证据,从而证实了书面资料所表明的放弃时间。这些过程是在当地政治冲突(Dohna Feud)的背景下讨论的,这导致了财产的再分配和采矿经济在这段时间的发展。从16世纪中期开始,土地的使用似乎仅限于木炭生产,可能是在附近的施米德贝格(Schmiedeberg)冶炼工厂的背景下,冲积物记录中铅浓度的上升表明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of geochemical proxies and radiocarbon data from a loess record of the Upper Palaeolithic site Kammern-Grubgraben, Lower Austria Late Quaternary landform evolution and sedimentary successions in the Miaoli Tableland, northwestern Taiwan A tribute to Flohn (1963)​​​​​​​: On the meteorological interpretation of Pleistocene climate variations A tribute to Schwarzbach (1968): Recent ice age hypotheses A tribute to Menke (1970): Results of pollen analysis on the Pleistocene stratigraphy and the Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary in Schleswig-Holstein
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1