{"title":"Preservation of Ovarian Reserve after Laparoscopic Cystectomy","authors":"C. Iavazzo, N. Vrachnis, I. Gkegkes","doi":"10.6118/jmm.22003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Dear Editor, With great deal of interest we read the article entitled “Comparison of serum anti-Mullerian hormone-level changes in single-port laparoscopic endometriotic and non-endometriotic ovarian cyst enucleations” by Cabiscuelas et al. [1]. Ovarian reserve measured by levels of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) can be affected by surgical technique as presented by the authors and such a postoperative decrease of AMH levels can be higher in patients treated for endometriosis. Although, a Cochrane review showed that laparoscopic approach is the preferable technique to prevent endometriosis recurrence [2]. A recent metanalysis revealed that the postoperative decrease of AMH levels was greater in endometriomas compared to other benign ovarian cysts and the decline was more significant in bilateral endometriomas [3]. Moreover, the same metanalysis highlighted the role of surgical technique in the inflammatory damage of the ovarian cortex (especially the use of bipolar energy haemostasis versus the use of sutures and haemostatic agents) [3]. We would like to highlight some ways to preserve ovarian reserve after laparoscopic cystectomy for endometriomas. A recent randomized controlled trial revealed that perioperative use of dienogest has better outcomes in ovarian reserve after cystectomy of endometrioma compared to perioperative use of GnRH analogues [4]. More specifically, in the arm using GnRH analogues, all the patients had less than 70% of the preoperative AMH levels, whereas 60% of the patients treated with dienogest achieved to have at least 70% of the preoperative AMH levels. Other methods to preserve ovarian reserve include either cyst deroofing [5] or use of Surgicel [6]; however, their role is questionable in preventing recurrence. Once again, we would like to thank the authors for their excellent contribution.","PeriodicalId":16410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Menopausal Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"40 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Menopausal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6118/jmm.22003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Dear Editor, With great deal of interest we read the article entitled “Comparison of serum anti-Mullerian hormone-level changes in single-port laparoscopic endometriotic and non-endometriotic ovarian cyst enucleations” by Cabiscuelas et al. [1]. Ovarian reserve measured by levels of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) can be affected by surgical technique as presented by the authors and such a postoperative decrease of AMH levels can be higher in patients treated for endometriosis. Although, a Cochrane review showed that laparoscopic approach is the preferable technique to prevent endometriosis recurrence [2]. A recent metanalysis revealed that the postoperative decrease of AMH levels was greater in endometriomas compared to other benign ovarian cysts and the decline was more significant in bilateral endometriomas [3]. Moreover, the same metanalysis highlighted the role of surgical technique in the inflammatory damage of the ovarian cortex (especially the use of bipolar energy haemostasis versus the use of sutures and haemostatic agents) [3]. We would like to highlight some ways to preserve ovarian reserve after laparoscopic cystectomy for endometriomas. A recent randomized controlled trial revealed that perioperative use of dienogest has better outcomes in ovarian reserve after cystectomy of endometrioma compared to perioperative use of GnRH analogues [4]. More specifically, in the arm using GnRH analogues, all the patients had less than 70% of the preoperative AMH levels, whereas 60% of the patients treated with dienogest achieved to have at least 70% of the preoperative AMH levels. Other methods to preserve ovarian reserve include either cyst deroofing [5] or use of Surgicel [6]; however, their role is questionable in preventing recurrence. Once again, we would like to thank the authors for their excellent contribution.
这是一篇基于知识共享署名非商业许可协议(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)的开放获取文章。亲爱的编辑,与大量的利益我们读这篇文章题为“比较血清她们血液中的抗苗勒氏管激素水平变化广泛异位和non-endometriotic腹腔镜卵巢囊肿摘出术”Cabiscuelas et al。[1]。根据作者提出的,通过抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平测量的卵巢储备可受手术技术的影响,并且子宫内膜异位症患者术后AMH水平的降低可能更高。虽然,Cochrane综述显示腹腔镜入路是预防子宫内膜异位症复发的首选技术[2]。最近的一项荟萃分析显示,子宫内膜异位瘤术后AMH水平的下降幅度大于其他良性卵巢囊肿,双侧子宫内膜异位瘤的下降幅度更大[3]。此外,同一荟萃分析强调了手术技术在卵巢皮质炎症损伤中的作用(特别是使用双极能量止血与使用缝合线和止血剂)[3]。我们想强调一些方法,以保留卵巢储备后腹腔镜膀胱切除术子宫内膜异位瘤。最近的一项随机对照试验显示,与围手术期使用GnRH类似物相比,围手术期使用dienogest对子宫内膜异位瘤膀胱切除术后的卵巢储备有更好的效果[4]。更具体地说,在使用GnRH类似物的对照组中,所有患者的AMH水平均低于术前水平的70%,而使用dienogest治疗的患者中有60%达到了至少70%的术前AMH水平。其他保留卵巢储备的方法包括囊肿去皮[5]或使用surgical [6];然而,它们在预防复发方面的作用值得怀疑。我们要再次感谢作者的杰出贡献。