Everything is not everywhere: can marine compartments shape phytoplankton assemblages?

S. Spatharis, Vasiliki Lamprinou, A. Meziti, K. Kormas, Daniel D. Danielidis, E. Smeti, D. Roelke, R. Mancy, G. Tsirtsis
{"title":"Everything is not everywhere: can marine compartments shape phytoplankton assemblages?","authors":"S. Spatharis, Vasiliki Lamprinou, A. Meziti, K. Kormas, Daniel D. Danielidis, E. Smeti, D. Roelke, R. Mancy, G. Tsirtsis","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2019.1890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea that ‘everything is everywhere, but the environment selects' has been seminal in microbial biogeography, and marine phytoplankton is one of the prototypical groups used to illustrate this. The typical argument has been that phytoplankton is ubiquitous, but that distinct assemblages form under environmental selection. It is well established that phytoplankton assemblages vary considerably between coastal ecosystems. However, the relative roles of compartmentalization of regional seas and site-specific environmental conditions in shaping assemblage structures have not been specifically examined. We collected data from coastal embayments that fall within two different water compartments within the same regional sea and are characterized by highly localized environmental pressures. We used principal coordinates of neighbour matrices (PCNM) and asymmetric eigenvector maps (AEM) models to partition the effects that spatial structures, environmental conditions and their overlap had on the variation in assemblage composition. Our models explained a high percentage of variation in assemblage composition (59–65%) and showed that spatial structure consistent with marine compartmentalization played a more important role than local environmental conditions. At least during the study period, surface currents connecting sites within the two compartments failed to generate sufficient dispersal to offset the impact of differences due to compartmentalization. In other words, our findings suggest that, even for a prototypical cosmopolitan group, everything is not everywhere.","PeriodicalId":20609,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The idea that ‘everything is everywhere, but the environment selects' has been seminal in microbial biogeography, and marine phytoplankton is one of the prototypical groups used to illustrate this. The typical argument has been that phytoplankton is ubiquitous, but that distinct assemblages form under environmental selection. It is well established that phytoplankton assemblages vary considerably between coastal ecosystems. However, the relative roles of compartmentalization of regional seas and site-specific environmental conditions in shaping assemblage structures have not been specifically examined. We collected data from coastal embayments that fall within two different water compartments within the same regional sea and are characterized by highly localized environmental pressures. We used principal coordinates of neighbour matrices (PCNM) and asymmetric eigenvector maps (AEM) models to partition the effects that spatial structures, environmental conditions and their overlap had on the variation in assemblage composition. Our models explained a high percentage of variation in assemblage composition (59–65%) and showed that spatial structure consistent with marine compartmentalization played a more important role than local environmental conditions. At least during the study period, surface currents connecting sites within the two compartments failed to generate sufficient dispersal to offset the impact of differences due to compartmentalization. In other words, our findings suggest that, even for a prototypical cosmopolitan group, everything is not everywhere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
万物并非无处不在:海洋隔间能塑造浮游植物的组合吗?
“万物无处不在,但环境选择”这一观点在微生物生物地理学中具有开创性,海洋浮游植物是用来说明这一观点的典型群体之一。典型的论点是,浮游植物是普遍存在的,但在环境选择下形成了独特的组合。浮游植物的组合在沿海生态系统之间有很大的差异,这是公认的。然而,区域海洋的分区化和特定地点的环境条件在形成组合结构中的相对作用尚未得到具体研究。我们收集了位于同一区域海域内两个不同水域的沿海围堰的数据,这些围堰的特点是高度局部化的环境压力。利用邻域矩阵主坐标(PCNM)和非对称特征向量映射(AEM)模型划分了空间结构、环境条件及其重叠对组合组成变化的影响。我们的模型解释了组合组成的高变异百分比(59-65%),并表明与海洋分区一致的空间结构比当地环境条件发挥了更重要的作用。至少在研究期间,两个分区内连接站点的表面水流未能产生足够的分散,以抵消分区化造成的差异的影响。换句话说,我们的研究结果表明,即使是一个典型的世界性群体,也不是所有的东西都是无处不在的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Still air resistance during walking and running Functional plasticity of the swim bladder as an acoustic organ for communication in a vocal fish Millennial processes of population decline, range contraction and near extinction of the European bison Variation in personality shaped by evolutionary history, genotype and developmental plasticity in response to feeding modalities in the Arctic charr Magnetic fields, cancer and circadian rhythms: hypotheses on the relevance of intermittence and cycling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1