Teachers Induction and Digital Culture. The case of Southern Italy Teachers attending TFA

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society Pub Date : 2018-06-18 DOI:10.20368/1971-8829/1494
Fedela Feldia Loperfido, Anna Dipace, Katia Caposeno, A. Scarinci, J. Viteli
{"title":"Teachers Induction and Digital Culture. The case of Southern Italy Teachers attending TFA","authors":"Fedela Feldia Loperfido, Anna Dipace, Katia Caposeno, A. Scarinci, J. Viteli","doi":"10.20368/1971-8829/1494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims at describing one of the possible Italian teachers induction paths, which is called “TFA”. Then, we grasp how Southern Italy participants in a TFA course aimed at educate to teach students with special educational needs shape their own digital culture. All of the participants are in an induction process related to teaching students with special educational needs; however, some of them are already experienced teachers about other teaching fields (different from the one related to special educational needs). So, we first run Principal Component Analysis to detect what factors compose the participants’ digital culture. Then we run independent samples t-test to observe differences between males and females, and experienced and not experienced teachers. Results show that two of the four detected factors are similar to those proposed by literature. The other two, instead, differ from them. Furthermore, it emerged that, on average, males have higher scores than females on the factors; these differences are significant on three factors. Last but not the least, experienced teachers have, on average, higher scores than not experienced participants. However, these differences are not significant.","PeriodicalId":44748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society","volume":"51 1","pages":"67-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims at describing one of the possible Italian teachers induction paths, which is called “TFA”. Then, we grasp how Southern Italy participants in a TFA course aimed at educate to teach students with special educational needs shape their own digital culture. All of the participants are in an induction process related to teaching students with special educational needs; however, some of them are already experienced teachers about other teaching fields (different from the one related to special educational needs). So, we first run Principal Component Analysis to detect what factors compose the participants’ digital culture. Then we run independent samples t-test to observe differences between males and females, and experienced and not experienced teachers. Results show that two of the four detected factors are similar to those proposed by literature. The other two, instead, differ from them. Furthermore, it emerged that, on average, males have higher scores than females on the factors; these differences are significant on three factors. Last but not the least, experienced teachers have, on average, higher scores than not experienced participants. However, these differences are not significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师导入与数字文化。南意大利教师参加TFA的案例
本文旨在描述一种可能的意大利语教师导入路径,称为“TFA”。然后,我们掌握了意大利南部的TFA课程的参与者如何培养有特殊教育需求的学生塑造自己的数字文化。所有参与者都在一个与特殊教育需要学生的教学相关的入职过程中;然而,他们中的一些人已经是其他教学领域的经验丰富的教师(不同于与特殊教育需要相关的教师)。因此,我们首先运行主成分分析来检测哪些因素构成了参与者的数字文化。然后,我们进行独立样本t检验,观察男性和女性,经验丰富的教师和没有经验的教师之间的差异。结果表明,四个检测因子中有两个与文献中提出的相似。相反,另外两个则不同。此外,研究还发现,平均而言,男性在这些因素上的得分高于女性;这些差异主要体现在三个方面。最后但并非最不重要的是,经验丰富的教师平均得分高于没有经验的参与者。然而,这些差异并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society
Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: SIe-L , Italian e-Learning Association, is a non-profit organization who operates as a non-commercial entity to promote scientific research and testing best practices of e-Learning and Distance Education. SIe-L consider these subjects strategic for citizen and companies for their instruction and education.
期刊最新文献
Key issues and pedagogical implications in the design of Digital Educational Escape rooms Symbols and Their Meanings Truth and Truths The Prehistory of Knowledge Ideas as Meanings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1