Self-enhancement and cross-cultural adjustment: overclaiming in a global mobility context

Klaus J. Templer
{"title":"Self-enhancement and cross-cultural adjustment: overclaiming in a global mobility context","authors":"Klaus J. Templer","doi":"10.1108/jgm-08-2019-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aimed to test Early and Ang’s (2003) proposition that self-enhancement hinders successful cross-cultural adjustment. The literature on self-enhancement is reviewed, and the overclaiming technique as an unobtrusive measure of self-enhancement is introduced for use in global mobility contexts.Design/methodology/approachUsing the overclaiming technique, an international-cultural overclaiming test was developed. Expatriates in Singapore stated their familiarity with international-cultural knowledge items, with some of them being foil items, and rated their cross-cultural (general, interaction, work) adjustment. Supervisors rated the expatriates on their work adjustment and performance.FindingsOverclaiming was not related to self-rated cross-cultural adjustment. However, overclaiming was negatively related to supervisor rated work adjustment and performance. Additionally, the results showed that international-cultural knowledge accuracy was positively related to self-rated general adjustment and to supervisor rated work adjustment and performance.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size with a majority of expatriate teachers from international schools in the sample makes it necessary for the results to be replicated with larger and more varied expatriate samples.Practical implicationsWhile further validation is needed, this research indicates that the overclaiming technique could be a valuable tool for assessing self-enhancement in candidates for expatriate positions in order to gauge potential cross-cultural (mal)adjustment, as perceived by others.Originality/valueThis study was (likely) the first study that has applied the overclaiming technique in a global mobility context. An international-cultural knowledge overclaiming test is provided to academic researchers for future use.","PeriodicalId":44863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Mobility-The Home of Expatriate Management Research","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Mobility-The Home of Expatriate Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgm-08-2019-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to test Early and Ang’s (2003) proposition that self-enhancement hinders successful cross-cultural adjustment. The literature on self-enhancement is reviewed, and the overclaiming technique as an unobtrusive measure of self-enhancement is introduced for use in global mobility contexts.Design/methodology/approachUsing the overclaiming technique, an international-cultural overclaiming test was developed. Expatriates in Singapore stated their familiarity with international-cultural knowledge items, with some of them being foil items, and rated their cross-cultural (general, interaction, work) adjustment. Supervisors rated the expatriates on their work adjustment and performance.FindingsOverclaiming was not related to self-rated cross-cultural adjustment. However, overclaiming was negatively related to supervisor rated work adjustment and performance. Additionally, the results showed that international-cultural knowledge accuracy was positively related to self-rated general adjustment and to supervisor rated work adjustment and performance.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size with a majority of expatriate teachers from international schools in the sample makes it necessary for the results to be replicated with larger and more varied expatriate samples.Practical implicationsWhile further validation is needed, this research indicates that the overclaiming technique could be a valuable tool for assessing self-enhancement in candidates for expatriate positions in order to gauge potential cross-cultural (mal)adjustment, as perceived by others.Originality/valueThis study was (likely) the first study that has applied the overclaiming technique in a global mobility context. An international-cultural knowledge overclaiming test is provided to academic researchers for future use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我提升与跨文化适应:全球流动背景下的过度要求
目的本研究旨在验证Early和Ang(2003)关于自我提升阻碍成功跨文化适应的观点。本文对自我提升的相关文献进行了回顾,并介绍了过度要求技术作为一种不引人注目的自我提升措施在全球流动背景下的应用。设计/方法/方法使用过度要求技术,开发了一种国际文化过度要求测试。在新加坡的外籍人士陈述了他们对国际文化知识项目的熟悉程度,其中一些是陪衬项目,并评估了他们的跨文化(一般、互动、工作)适应情况。主管们对外派人员的工作适应性和表现进行了评估。结果:自我评价与自我评定的跨文化适应无关。然而,过度要求与主管评价的工作调整和绩效呈负相关。此外,国际文化知识准确性与自我评定的一般适应和主管评定的工作适应和绩效呈正相关。研究的局限性/意义样本规模小,样本中大多数是来自国际学校的外籍教师,因此有必要用更大、更多样化的外籍教师样本来重复研究结果。实际意义虽然需要进一步验证,但本研究表明,过度要求技术可能是评估外籍职位候选人自我提升的一个有价值的工具,以衡量他人所感知的潜在跨文化(不良)调整。原创性/价值本研究(可能)是第一个在全球流动性背景下应用过度要求技术的研究。为学术研究人员提供了一个国际文化知识夸大测试,以供将来使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
How does your cultural intelligence contribute to your adjustment? Unveiling the link between cultural intelligence and cross-cultural adjustment using meta-analysis Does the overall justice climate enhance self-initiated expatriates' creativity during uncertain times ? The mediating role of cross-cultural psychological capital Dynamics of male society at work in Japanese firms: inclusion of female self-initiated expatriates in the labour force? The mediating performance role of staffing options in MNE subsidiary strategies within rapidly deteriorating environments Strategic divestment of emerging market firms: the influence of returnee managers and CEO characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1