First-Break Picking Classification Models Using Recurrent Neural Network

Mohammed Ayub, S. Kaka
{"title":"First-Break Picking Classification Models Using Recurrent Neural Network","authors":"Mohammed Ayub, S. Kaka","doi":"10.2118/204862-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Manual first-break picking from a large volume of seismic data is extremely tedious and costly. Deployment of machine learning models makes the process fast and cost effective. However, these machine learning models require high representative and effective features for accurate automatic picking. Therefore, First- Break (FB) picking classification model that uses effective minimum number of features and promises performance efficiency is proposed. The variants of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) such as Long ShortTerm Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) can retain contextual information from long previous time steps. We deploy this advantage for FB picking as seismic traces are amplitude values of vibration along the time-axis. We use behavioral fluctuation of amplitude as input features for LSTM and GRU. The models are trained on noisy data and tested for generalization on original traces not seen during the training and validation process. In order to analyze the real-time suitability, the performance is benchmarked using accuracy, F1-measure and three other established metrics. We have trained two RNN models and two deep Neural Network models for FB classification using only amplitude values as features. Both LSTM and GRU have the accuracy and F1-measure with a score of 94.20%. With the same features, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has an accuracy of 93.58% and F1-score of 93.63%. Again, Deep Neural Network (DNN) model has scores of 92.83% and 92.59% as accuracy and F1-measure, respectively. From the pexperiment results, we see significant superior performance of LSTM and GRU to CNN and DNN when used the same features. For robustness of LSTM and GRU models, the performance is compared with DNN model that is trained using nine features derived from seismic traces and observed that the performance superiority of RNN models. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that RNN models (LSTM and GRU) are capable of classifying the FB events efficiently even by using a minimum number of features that are not computationally expensive. The novelty of our work is the capability of automatic FB classification with the RNN models that incorporate contextual behavioral information without the need for sophisticated feature extraction or engineering techniques that in turn can help in reducing the cost and fostering classification model robust and faster.","PeriodicalId":11094,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204862-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manual first-break picking from a large volume of seismic data is extremely tedious and costly. Deployment of machine learning models makes the process fast and cost effective. However, these machine learning models require high representative and effective features for accurate automatic picking. Therefore, First- Break (FB) picking classification model that uses effective minimum number of features and promises performance efficiency is proposed. The variants of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) such as Long ShortTerm Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) can retain contextual information from long previous time steps. We deploy this advantage for FB picking as seismic traces are amplitude values of vibration along the time-axis. We use behavioral fluctuation of amplitude as input features for LSTM and GRU. The models are trained on noisy data and tested for generalization on original traces not seen during the training and validation process. In order to analyze the real-time suitability, the performance is benchmarked using accuracy, F1-measure and three other established metrics. We have trained two RNN models and two deep Neural Network models for FB classification using only amplitude values as features. Both LSTM and GRU have the accuracy and F1-measure with a score of 94.20%. With the same features, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has an accuracy of 93.58% and F1-score of 93.63%. Again, Deep Neural Network (DNN) model has scores of 92.83% and 92.59% as accuracy and F1-measure, respectively. From the pexperiment results, we see significant superior performance of LSTM and GRU to CNN and DNN when used the same features. For robustness of LSTM and GRU models, the performance is compared with DNN model that is trained using nine features derived from seismic traces and observed that the performance superiority of RNN models. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that RNN models (LSTM and GRU) are capable of classifying the FB events efficiently even by using a minimum number of features that are not computationally expensive. The novelty of our work is the capability of automatic FB classification with the RNN models that incorporate contextual behavioral information without the need for sophisticated feature extraction or engineering techniques that in turn can help in reducing the cost and fostering classification model robust and faster.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于递归神经网络的首破选取分类模型
人工从大量地震数据中选取首波是非常繁琐和昂贵的。机器学习模型的部署使该过程快速且经济有效。然而,这些机器学习模型需要高代表性和有效的特征来实现准确的自动拣选。为此,提出了一种利用有效最小特征数并保证性能效率的首破(FB)拣选分类模型。递归神经网络(rnn)的变体,如长短期记忆(LSTM)和门控递归单元(GRU),可以从较长的前一时间步长中保留上下文信息。我们将这一优势用于FB拾取,因为地震轨迹是沿时间轴的振动振幅值。我们使用幅度的行为波动作为LSTM和GRU的输入特征。这些模型在有噪声的数据上进行训练,并在训练和验证过程中未看到的原始轨迹上进行泛化测试。为了分析实时适用性,使用精度、F1-measure和其他三个既定指标对性能进行基准测试。我们训练了两个RNN模型和两个深度神经网络模型,仅使用振幅值作为特征进行FB分类。LSTM和GRU的准确率和f1测量值均为94.20%。在相同的特征下,卷积神经网络(CNN)的准确率为93.58%,F1-score为93.63%。同样,深度神经网络(Deep Neural Network, DNN)模型的准确率和f1测量值分别为92.83%和92.59%。从实验结果来看,当使用相同的特征时,LSTM和GRU的性能明显优于CNN和DNN。为了提高LSTM和GRU模型的鲁棒性,将其性能与利用地震迹线衍生的9个特征训练的DNN模型进行了比较,观察到RNN模型的性能优势。因此,可以肯定地得出结论,RNN模型(LSTM和GRU)能够有效地对FB事件进行分类,即使使用最小数量的计算成本不高的特征。我们工作的新颖之处在于使用RNN模型进行自动FB分类的能力,该模型包含上下文行为信息,而不需要复杂的特征提取或工程技术,这反过来可以帮助降低成本并促进分类模型的鲁棒性和速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Leaders Can Shape the Oil & Gas Industry – Accelerating Innovations Through Business & Environmental Intelligent Systems High Performance Friction Reducer for Slickwater Fracturing Applications: Laboratory Study and Field Implementation CO2 Waterless Fracturing and Huff and Puff in Tight Oil Reservoir Switched Reluctance Motor for Electric Submersible Pump Sparse Water Fracture Channel Detection from Subsurface Sensors Via a Smart Orthogonal Matching Pursuit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1