Health-Care Personnel's Perspective on COVID-19 Vaccination – A Cross-Sectional Study

N. George, Abdul Shagirunisha Rizvana, N. Vignesh kumar, R. Britto
{"title":"Health-Care Personnel's Perspective on COVID-19 Vaccination – A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"N. George, Abdul Shagirunisha Rizvana, N. Vignesh kumar, R. Britto","doi":"10.4103/amit.amit_47_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The COVID pandemic was a modern world disaster which had physical, psychological, and economical impact among the people. This made the governing agencies and others to rollout vaccine in a prompt basis. The objectives were to assess the attitude of health-care personnel toward COVID-19 vaccination using online survey and to assess the willingness of COVID-19 vaccination and factors affecting it among health-care personnel. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using web-based platforms among 471 health-care personnel's within a period of a month (December 2020–January 2021). The study was conducted after obtaining institution ethic committee approval and informed consent. The questionnaire contains sociodemographic detail, COVID profile section, and questions which reveal the beliefs and attitude toward vaccination particularly COVID-19. The data collected was entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 16 software. Results: Among the participants, 56 (11.9%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 and 119 (25.3%) were not willing to take vaccine. Participants who were hesitant about the role of vaccine in immunity, afraid of side effects, doubtful about effectiveness and protection and who doubt about the production involving cost and supply have showed unwillingness to vaccination (P < 0.05). Conclusion: A quarter of the present study population showed unwillingness to take COVID vaccine, and evidence of uncertainty about the vaccine safety and production was exposed in the study. The results should be looked upon gravely as the issues appeared here can be maximized when the vaccine rollout happens in public.","PeriodicalId":32506,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica International","volume":"99 1","pages":"16 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/amit.amit_47_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID pandemic was a modern world disaster which had physical, psychological, and economical impact among the people. This made the governing agencies and others to rollout vaccine in a prompt basis. The objectives were to assess the attitude of health-care personnel toward COVID-19 vaccination using online survey and to assess the willingness of COVID-19 vaccination and factors affecting it among health-care personnel. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using web-based platforms among 471 health-care personnel's within a period of a month (December 2020–January 2021). The study was conducted after obtaining institution ethic committee approval and informed consent. The questionnaire contains sociodemographic detail, COVID profile section, and questions which reveal the beliefs and attitude toward vaccination particularly COVID-19. The data collected was entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 16 software. Results: Among the participants, 56 (11.9%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 and 119 (25.3%) were not willing to take vaccine. Participants who were hesitant about the role of vaccine in immunity, afraid of side effects, doubtful about effectiveness and protection and who doubt about the production involving cost and supply have showed unwillingness to vaccination (P < 0.05). Conclusion: A quarter of the present study population showed unwillingness to take COVID vaccine, and evidence of uncertainty about the vaccine safety and production was exposed in the study. The results should be looked upon gravely as the issues appeared here can be maximized when the vaccine rollout happens in public.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生保健人员对COVID-19疫苗接种的看法——一项横断面研究
新冠肺炎大流行是一场现代世界灾难,对人们的身体、心理和经济产生了影响。这使得管理机构和其他机构能够迅速推出疫苗。目的:采用在线调查的方法,评估卫生保健人员对新冠肺炎疫苗接种的态度,评估卫生保健人员对新冠肺炎疫苗接种的意愿及其影响因素。材料和方法:我们在一个月内(2020年12月- 2021年1月)利用网络平台对471名卫生保健人员进行了横断面研究。本研究是在获得机构伦理委员会批准和知情同意后进行的。问卷包含社会人口学细节、COVID简介部分以及揭示对疫苗接种特别是COVID-19的信念和态度的问题。收集的数据在Microsoft Excel中输入,并使用SPSS version 16软件进行分析。结果:56人(11.9%)确诊为新冠肺炎,119人(25.3%)不愿接种疫苗。对疫苗在免疫中的作用犹豫不决、害怕副作用、怀疑有效性和保护作用以及怀疑生产涉及成本和供应的参与者不愿意接种疫苗(P < 0.05)。结论:1 / 4的研究人群不愿接种新冠肺炎疫苗,暴露出疫苗安全性和生产不确定的证据。结果应该被严肃看待,因为当疫苗在公共场合推广时,这里出现的问题可能会最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and the factors associated with self-medication practice: A community-based cross-sectional study in an Urban Area of Purba Bardhaman, West Bengal, India The new 2021 world health organization classification of central nervous system tumor A study of the medical record department's experience, competence, and application at a tertiary care hospital Effectiveness of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as an adjunct in the treatment of enteric fever in children: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial in Southern India Comparative study on the effects and complications of transverse insertion of two fine gauge quincke's spinal needles 26 and 29 G in spinal anesthesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1