Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Reference Infliximab (Remicade) Compared to its Biosimilar (Remsima) in Iraqi Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (Conference Paper )#

Hasan Raid Fadhil, A. A. Al-Jumaili, N. Al-Ani
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Reference Infliximab (Remicade) Compared to its Biosimilar (Remsima) in Iraqi Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (Conference Paper )#","authors":"Hasan Raid Fadhil, A. A. Al-Jumaili, N. Al-Ani","doi":"10.31351/vol31isssuppl.pp100-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study objective was to conduct Pharmacoeconomics study (cost-effective analysis) between infliximab reference (Remicade) and its biosimilar (Remsima) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Iraqi hospitals. \nThis is a retrospective multicenter pharmacoeconomic analysis conducted at two large teaching governmental hospitals in Baghdad, Iraq which provided infliximab to patients with RA. Data were collected from patient’s medical records and face-to-face interviews with the patients from December 2021 to April 2022. \nThe study included 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).  The patients were categorized into two groups according to the type of infliximab they received over 30 weeks: 27 patients received reference infliximab (Remicade) and 30 patients received biosimilar infliximab (Remsima). The two groups had comparable demographic and baseline disease parameters, with a mean age of 49.6 years and a BMI of 30.0. The vast majority of participants were women (82.5%) with low level of formal education (65%). Overall, both infliximab biopharmaceuticals had good effectiveness to reduce the RA disease activity (CDAI) and improve patient quality of life. They both had comparable adverse reactions including UTI, fatigue, and headache. There was no significant difference (P-value >0.05) in disease activity between the two groups according to RA clinical disease activity index (CDAI) score across all three-time measures: before biological therapy, 14 weeks post-therapy and 30 weeks post-therapy. \nIn 2019, Remicade was slightly more effective and provide better quality of life, but costlier ($41,896 per QALY) compared to Remsima. It was not clear whether the reference biologic (Remicade) or its biosimilar (Remsima) was more cost effective. In 2021, Remicade was more cost effective compared to Remsima because Remicade was less expensive and relatively more effective according to CDAI and EQ-5D-5L scores. Registering and purchasing both reference infliximab and its biosimilar was good idea to keep the competition in the price and maintain infliximab for RA patients. ","PeriodicalId":14509,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences ( P-ISSN: 1683 - 3597 , E-ISSN : 2521 - 3512)","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences ( P-ISSN: 1683 - 3597 , E-ISSN : 2521 - 3512)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31351/vol31isssuppl.pp100-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study objective was to conduct Pharmacoeconomics study (cost-effective analysis) between infliximab reference (Remicade) and its biosimilar (Remsima) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Iraqi hospitals. This is a retrospective multicenter pharmacoeconomic analysis conducted at two large teaching governmental hospitals in Baghdad, Iraq which provided infliximab to patients with RA. Data were collected from patient’s medical records and face-to-face interviews with the patients from December 2021 to April 2022. The study included 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).  The patients were categorized into two groups according to the type of infliximab they received over 30 weeks: 27 patients received reference infliximab (Remicade) and 30 patients received biosimilar infliximab (Remsima). The two groups had comparable demographic and baseline disease parameters, with a mean age of 49.6 years and a BMI of 30.0. The vast majority of participants were women (82.5%) with low level of formal education (65%). Overall, both infliximab biopharmaceuticals had good effectiveness to reduce the RA disease activity (CDAI) and improve patient quality of life. They both had comparable adverse reactions including UTI, fatigue, and headache. There was no significant difference (P-value >0.05) in disease activity between the two groups according to RA clinical disease activity index (CDAI) score across all three-time measures: before biological therapy, 14 weeks post-therapy and 30 weeks post-therapy. In 2019, Remicade was slightly more effective and provide better quality of life, but costlier ($41,896 per QALY) compared to Remsima. It was not clear whether the reference biologic (Remicade) or its biosimilar (Remsima) was more cost effective. In 2021, Remicade was more cost effective compared to Remsima because Remicade was less expensive and relatively more effective according to CDAI and EQ-5D-5L scores. Registering and purchasing both reference infliximab and its biosimilar was good idea to keep the competition in the price and maintain infliximab for RA patients. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参考英夫利昔单抗(Remicade)与生物类似药(Remsima)在伊拉克类风湿关节炎患者中的成本-效果分析(会议论文)#
研究目的是对伊拉克医院的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者进行英夫利昔单抗参考(Remicade)与其生物类似药(Remsima)之间的药物经济学研究(成本效益分析)。这是一项回顾性的多中心药物经济学分析,在伊拉克巴格达的两家大型教学政府医院进行,为RA患者提供英夫利昔单抗。数据收集自2021年12月至2022年4月患者的医疗记录和面对面访谈。该研究包括57例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者。根据患者在30周内接受的英夫利昔单抗类型将患者分为两组:27例患者接受参考英夫利昔单抗(Remicade), 30例患者接受生物仿制药英夫利昔单抗(Remsima)。两组的人口统计学和基线疾病参数具有可比性,平均年龄为49.6岁,BMI为30.0。绝大多数参与者是女性(82.5%),受正规教育程度较低(65%)。总体而言,这两种英夫利昔单抗生物药物在降低RA疾病活动性(CDAI)和改善患者生活质量方面均具有良好的效果。他们都有类似的不良反应,包括尿路感染、疲劳和头痛。两组患者在生物治疗前、治疗后14周和治疗后30周的RA临床疾病活动性指数(CDAI)评分中,疾病活动性差异无统计学意义(p值>0.05)。2019年,与Remsima相比,Remicade的效果略好,提供了更好的生活质量,但成本更高(每个QALY 41896美元)。目前尚不清楚参比生物制剂(Remicade)或其生物仿制药(Remsima)是否更具成本效益。在2021年,Remicade比Remsima更具成本效益,因为根据CDAI和EQ-5D-5L评分,Remicade更便宜,相对更有效。注册和购买参考英夫利昔单抗及其生物仿制药是保持价格竞争和维持英夫利昔单抗用于RA患者的好主意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Renoprotective Effect of Lipoic Acid and Bosentan Against Diclofenac-Induced Acute Renal Failure Assessment of Certain Hematological Indices and Interlukin-6 in Workers and Individuals Who Live Near to Crude Oil Wells in Middle Petroleum Subchronic effect of different doses ofDiclofenac Sodium on female reproductive system in rats. Evaluating the Benefits of Using Mobile Application (diarrhea management step by step) in the Management of Diarrhea by Community Pharmacists Study anti-inflammatory effect of Tamsulosin in rat by evaluation IL-4, IL-6 and TNF-α: airway model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1