Immunological aspects of determination of an adequate biological treatment sequence for inflammatory bowel diseases: the expert board statement (St. Petersburg, May 22, 2021)

E. Belousova, I. Kozlov, D. Abdulganieva, O. Alexeeva, I. Gubonina, A. Lishchinskaya, L. V. Tarasova, E. Chashkova, M. Shapina, O. Shifrin, O. Shchukina
{"title":"Immunological aspects of determination of an adequate biological treatment sequence for inflammatory bowel diseases: the expert board statement (St. Petersburg, May 22, 2021)","authors":"E. Belousova, I. Kozlov, D. Abdulganieva, O. Alexeeva, I. Gubonina, A. Lishchinskaya, L. V. Tarasova, E. Chashkova, M. Shapina, O. Shifrin, O. Shchukina","doi":"10.18786/2072-0505-2021-49-060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On May 22, 2021, the Expert Board met in St. Petersburg to discuss their position on immunological aspects of determination of an adequate biological treatment sequence for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The Expert Board aimed at discussion of current strategies, development of a consensus on determination of an adequate biological treatment sequence for IBD. The main topics of the agenda were the contribution of immune system to the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and their complications, efficacy of genetically engineered biological agents (GEBA) at various stages of IBD management. Participation of the leading Russian experts in IBD, as well as involvement of other specialties, made it possible to consider the topic by a multidisciplinary team, with an in-depth analysis of IBD pathophysiology, to better understand the course of the disease in some contradictory situation, for instance, when clinical remission is not associated with an endoscopically confirmed remission. One of the expected effects of this Expert Board meeting would be an improvement of GEBA administration in clinical practice, mostly due to the modification of clinical guidelines. This would ascertain and confirm the algorithms for GEBA administration for IBD, including the optimal treatment sequence depending on an agent’s mechanism of action and the patient profile. The clarification of the optimal GEBA sequence in the clinical guidelines could lead to more frequent GEBA administration in local medical clinics and institutions in the regions, where GEBA are used insufficiently due to little experience and absence of their precise positioning in the clinical guidelines.","PeriodicalId":7638,"journal":{"name":"Almanac of Clinical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Almanac of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2021-49-060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On May 22, 2021, the Expert Board met in St. Petersburg to discuss their position on immunological aspects of determination of an adequate biological treatment sequence for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The Expert Board aimed at discussion of current strategies, development of a consensus on determination of an adequate biological treatment sequence for IBD. The main topics of the agenda were the contribution of immune system to the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and their complications, efficacy of genetically engineered biological agents (GEBA) at various stages of IBD management. Participation of the leading Russian experts in IBD, as well as involvement of other specialties, made it possible to consider the topic by a multidisciplinary team, with an in-depth analysis of IBD pathophysiology, to better understand the course of the disease in some contradictory situation, for instance, when clinical remission is not associated with an endoscopically confirmed remission. One of the expected effects of this Expert Board meeting would be an improvement of GEBA administration in clinical practice, mostly due to the modification of clinical guidelines. This would ascertain and confirm the algorithms for GEBA administration for IBD, including the optimal treatment sequence depending on an agent’s mechanism of action and the patient profile. The clarification of the optimal GEBA sequence in the clinical guidelines could lead to more frequent GEBA administration in local medical clinics and institutions in the regions, where GEBA are used insufficiently due to little experience and absence of their precise positioning in the clinical guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定适当的炎症性肠病生物治疗顺序的免疫学方面:专家委员会声明(圣彼得堡,2021年5月22日)
2021年5月22日,专家委员会在圣彼得堡举行会议,讨论他们在确定适当的炎症性肠病(IBD)生物治疗顺序的免疫学方面的立场。专家委员会旨在讨论当前的战略,就确定适当的IBD生物治疗顺序达成共识。会议的主要议题是免疫系统对克罗恩病、溃疡性结肠炎及其并发症的病理生理的贡献,基因工程生物制剂(GEBA)在IBD治疗各个阶段的疗效。俄罗斯主要IBD专家的参与,以及其他专业的参与,使得一个多学科小组可以通过对IBD病理生理学的深入分析来考虑这个主题,以便在一些矛盾的情况下更好地了解疾病的进程,例如,当临床缓解与内窥镜证实的缓解无关时。本次专家委员会会议的预期效果之一是改善临床实践中的GEBA管理,主要是由于临床指南的修改。这将确定并确认GEBA治疗IBD的算法,包括根据药物的作用机制和患者情况确定的最佳治疗顺序。临床指南中对GEBA最佳顺序的澄清可能导致各区域的当地医疗诊所和机构更频繁地使用GEBA,这些地方由于缺乏经验和临床指南中没有对GEBA进行精确定位而使用不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The association between exosomal proteins and the efficacy of thermoradiochemotherapy in overweight/obese rectal cancer patients: a pilot prospective cohort study Del Nido versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection during ventricular septal defect repair in children under one year of age: a prospective randomized trial Efficacy and safety of negative wound pressure in the treatment of surgical complications after radical cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study Resistance to dopamine agonists in the treatment of prolactinomas: diagnostic criteria, mechanisms and ways to overcome it The clinical case of a combination of ankylosing spondylitis, ulcerative colitis and rheumatoid arthritis in one patient: where is the intersection point?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1