Prevention of femoral head collapse in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: Experimental strategies and recent advances

1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Pub Date : 2017-02-01 DOI:10.1302/2048-0105.61.360497
A. Horn, D. Eastwood
{"title":"Prevention of femoral head collapse in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: Experimental strategies and recent advances","authors":"A. Horn, D. Eastwood","doi":"10.1302/2048-0105.61.360497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legg-Calve-Perthes disease (LCPD) is a relatively common condition affecting around 4 in 100 000 children aged four to ten years. The extent of femoral head collapse and deformity following LCPD is the single most important factor contributing to long-term outcome.1,2 The severity of the residual deformity at skeletal maturity is most commonly described using the Stulberg classification.3 Treatment strategies during the active stage of LCPD frequently involve measures to minimise loads across the hip joint whilst maintaining movement, with the hope that this will prevent femoral head collapse and deformity. Treatment includes activity limitation, active/passive range of motion exercises and bracing, all complemented by appropriate analgesic medication. However, these strategies have not been proven to be effective in preventing femoral head collapse. In the long-term follow-up study by Larson et al,1 no difference was found between hip-related morbidity in patients that were treated with bracing, those treated with active range of motion strategies and those receiving no treatment. A recently published review also failed to demonstrate any benefit of bracing over no treatment.4 The failure of these treatment methods could possibly be ascribed to the fact that, even during slow walking, the forces acting across the hip joint far exceed body weight.5 Therefore, if, as it appears, we cannot prevent collapse of the ‘vulnerable/dead’ epiphysis, researchers will have to resort to exploring strategies that might strengthen the weakened epiphysis, rendering it more resistant to forces that lead to collapse and subsequent deformity.\n\nThis article summarises the recent advances and experimental strategies directed at preventing femoral head deformity in LCPD.\n\nDuring the initial phase of LCPD as described by Waldenstrom,6 there is disruption of the blood flow to the femoral head with subsequent necrosis of the marrow space and deep layers of articular …","PeriodicalId":50250,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":"3-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2048-0105.61.360497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Legg-Calve-Perthes disease (LCPD) is a relatively common condition affecting around 4 in 100 000 children aged four to ten years. The extent of femoral head collapse and deformity following LCPD is the single most important factor contributing to long-term outcome.1,2 The severity of the residual deformity at skeletal maturity is most commonly described using the Stulberg classification.3 Treatment strategies during the active stage of LCPD frequently involve measures to minimise loads across the hip joint whilst maintaining movement, with the hope that this will prevent femoral head collapse and deformity. Treatment includes activity limitation, active/passive range of motion exercises and bracing, all complemented by appropriate analgesic medication. However, these strategies have not been proven to be effective in preventing femoral head collapse. In the long-term follow-up study by Larson et al,1 no difference was found between hip-related morbidity in patients that were treated with bracing, those treated with active range of motion strategies and those receiving no treatment. A recently published review also failed to demonstrate any benefit of bracing over no treatment.4 The failure of these treatment methods could possibly be ascribed to the fact that, even during slow walking, the forces acting across the hip joint far exceed body weight.5 Therefore, if, as it appears, we cannot prevent collapse of the ‘vulnerable/dead’ epiphysis, researchers will have to resort to exploring strategies that might strengthen the weakened epiphysis, rendering it more resistant to forces that lead to collapse and subsequent deformity. This article summarises the recent advances and experimental strategies directed at preventing femoral head deformity in LCPD. During the initial phase of LCPD as described by Waldenstrom,6 there is disruption of the blood flow to the femoral head with subsequent necrosis of the marrow space and deep layers of articular …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
legg - calv - perthes病股骨头塌陷的预防:实验策略和最新进展
legg - calf - perthes disease (LCPD)是一种相对常见的疾病,影响约100,000名4至10岁儿童中的4名。LCPD后股骨头塌陷和畸形的程度是影响长期预后的最重要因素。1,2骨骼成熟时残余畸形的严重程度最常用Stulberg分类来描述LCPD活动期的治疗策略通常包括在保持运动的同时尽量减少髋关节负荷,希望这样可以防止股骨头塌陷和畸形。治疗包括活动限制、主动/被动活动范围练习和支具,并辅以适当的镇痛药物。然而,这些策略尚未被证明对预防股骨头塌陷有效。在Larson等人的长期随访研究中,1未发现接受支具治疗、积极活动范围策略治疗和未接受治疗的患者髋部相关发病率之间存在差异。最近发表的一篇评论也未能证明支具比不治疗有任何好处这些治疗方法的失败可能归因于这样一个事实,即即使在慢速行走时,作用在髋关节上的力也远远超过了体重因此,如果我们不能防止“脆弱/死亡”骨骺的塌陷,研究人员将不得不寻求加强脆弱骨骺的策略,使其更能抵抗导致塌陷和随后畸形的力量。本文综述了近期在预防LCPD股骨头畸形方面的研究进展和实验策略。在Waldenstrom所描述的LCPD的初始阶段,6有股骨头血流中断,随后骨髓间隙和关节深层坏死。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In Patients with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis, Cementless and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasties Did Not Differ for Functional Outcomes at 2 Years Implant-Positioning and Patient Factors Associated with Acromial and Scapular Spine Fractures After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty In Older Patients with an Unreconstructible Distal Humeral Fracture, Elbow Hemiarthroplasty and Total Elbow Arthroplasty Did Not Differ for Function at ≥2 Years Newton C. McCollough III Robert G. (Bob) Volz 1932-2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1