REPLY TO ADONIS FRANGESKOU’S RESPONSE

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH On the Horizon Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-366-372
A. Yampolskaya
{"title":"REPLY TO ADONIS FRANGESKOU’S RESPONSE","authors":"A. Yampolskaya","doi":"10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-366-372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is my short reply to Adonis Frangeskou’s response to my review of his book (2017). I offer a careful reading of the passage from Levinas quoted in Frangeskou’s response. I discuss the idea of God-in-me in connection with the issues of sensibility, vulnerability, and suffering. I argue that interpreting Levinas within the framework of the analytics of the sublime is crucially important for the catastrophic dimension of Levinas’ approach to subjectivity.","PeriodicalId":47013,"journal":{"name":"On the Horizon","volume":"21 1","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On the Horizon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-366-372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is my short reply to Adonis Frangeskou’s response to my review of his book (2017). I offer a careful reading of the passage from Levinas quoted in Frangeskou’s response. I discuss the idea of God-in-me in connection with the issues of sensibility, vulnerability, and suffering. I argue that interpreting Levinas within the framework of the analytics of the sublime is crucially important for the catastrophic dimension of Levinas’ approach to subjectivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回复adonis franeskou的回复
这是我对阿多尼斯·弗兰格斯库(Adonis Frangeskou)对我对他的书(2017)的评论的简短回复。我对弗兰格斯库的回答中引用的列维纳斯的一段话进行了仔细的解读。我在感性、脆弱和痛苦的问题上讨论了“我内在的上帝”的概念。我认为,在崇高分析的框架内解释列维纳斯,对于列维纳斯主体性方法的灾难性维度是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
On the Horizon
On the Horizon EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: On the Horizon provides an insight into how the changing face of technology is making it possible for educational institutions to form new relationships across geographic and cultural boundaries.
期刊最新文献
Our mission is uplift: Afrofuturism and collective work for liberation in Black homeschooling organizations High school teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in instruction Developing individual capability in organizations through the promotion of heutagogy Psychometric properties of a scale to measure social entrepreneurship competency in Mexican university students Student accommodation characteristics, perceived overall satisfaction and academic performance: evidence from six Scottish universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1