Extreme Vocals—A Retrospective Longitudinal study of Vocal Health in 20 Professional Singers Performing and Teaching Rough Vocal Effects

Abstract

Background

Rough vocal effects, extreme, or extended vocal techniques to sound intentionally hoarse or rough are an integral part of many genres and styles, and research has recently demonstrated the involvement of supraglottic narrowing and vibrations to produce such sounds. The vocal health of singing with rough vocal effects is poorly documented, especially in a longitudinal manner, while much vocal pedagogy continuously treats the sounds as harming to or dangerous for the vocal mechanism.

Objective

To longitudinally investigate the vocal health of professional singers who perform the five rough-sounding vocal effects Distortion, Growl, Grunt, Rattle, and Creaking as part of their singing and teaching.

Methods

Twenty singers underwent nasoendoscopic examination, filled in SVHI questionnaires, and were assessed by GRBAS with a 14-year interval in a retrospective longitudinal study (from 2007 to 2021). Endoscopic materials were assessed by Reflux Finding Score and a hybrid version of the Stroboscopy Rating Scale.

Results

Singers presented at initiation of study with an average SVHI of 9.2 (±9), which decreased at time of follow up 14 years later to an average of 5.12 (±6). Laryngeal assessments (RFS and SRS) revealed low averages at initiation of study as well as at conclusion of the study with only small fluctuations in averages, with findings mainly relating to arytenoid asymmetry.

Conclusion

The participating singers perform and teach rough vocal effects continually and present with healthy laryngeal mechanisms and within-normal SVHI and GRBAS scores. The findings suggest that controlled supraglottic narrowing and techniques to allow for supraglottic structures to engage in vibration as an additional noise source can be performed sustainable and in a healthy manner if performed with correct vocal technique.