Abuse assessment screen-disability (AAS-D): measuring frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with physical disabilities.

J. Mcfarlane, R. Hughes, M. Nosek, J. Groff, Nancy Swedlend, P. Mullen
{"title":"Abuse assessment screen-disability (AAS-D): measuring frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with physical disabilities.","authors":"J. Mcfarlane, R. Hughes, M. Nosek, J. Groff, Nancy Swedlend, P. Mullen","doi":"10.1089/152460901753285750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An interview questionnaire was presented to a multiethnic sample of 511 women, age 18-64 years, at public and private specialty clinics to determine the frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with physical disabilities. The four-question Abuse Assessment Screen-Disability (AAS-D) instrument detected a 9.8% prevalence (50 of 511) of abuse during the previous 12 months. Using two standard physical and sexual assault questions, 7.8% of the women (40 of 511) reported abuse. The two disability-related questions detected an additional 2.0% of the women (10 of 511) as abused. Women defining themselves as other than black, white, or Hispanic (i.e., Asian, mixed ethnic background) were more likely to report physical or sexual abuse or both, whereas disability-related abuse was reported almost exclusively by white women. The perpetrator of physical or sexual abuse was most likely to be an intimate partner. Disability-related abuse was attributed equally to an intimate partner, a care provider, or a health professional. This study concludes that both traditional abuse-focused questions and disability-specific questions are required to detect abuse toward women with physical disabilities.","PeriodicalId":80044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"148","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460901753285750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 148

Abstract

An interview questionnaire was presented to a multiethnic sample of 511 women, age 18-64 years, at public and private specialty clinics to determine the frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with physical disabilities. The four-question Abuse Assessment Screen-Disability (AAS-D) instrument detected a 9.8% prevalence (50 of 511) of abuse during the previous 12 months. Using two standard physical and sexual assault questions, 7.8% of the women (40 of 511) reported abuse. The two disability-related questions detected an additional 2.0% of the women (10 of 511) as abused. Women defining themselves as other than black, white, or Hispanic (i.e., Asian, mixed ethnic background) were more likely to report physical or sexual abuse or both, whereas disability-related abuse was reported almost exclusively by white women. The perpetrator of physical or sexual abuse was most likely to be an intimate partner. Disability-related abuse was attributed equally to an intimate partner, a care provider, or a health professional. This study concludes that both traditional abuse-focused questions and disability-specific questions are required to detect abuse toward women with physical disabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虐待评估屏幕残疾(AAS-D):测量对身体残疾妇女的虐待频率、类型和肇事者。
在公立和私立专科诊所对511名年龄在18-64岁的多种族妇女进行了访谈问卷调查,以确定对身体残疾妇女的虐待频率、类型和肇事者。四个问题的虐待评估筛选-残疾(AAS-D)工具在过去12个月内检测到9.8%的虐待发生率(511人中有50人)。使用两个标准的身体和性侵犯问题,7.8%的女性(511名中的40名)报告了虐待。两个与残疾有关的问题发现,另外2.0%的妇女(511人中有10人)受到虐待。定义自己为非黑人、白人或西班牙裔(即亚洲人、混合种族背景)的女性更有可能报告身体或性虐待,或两者兼而有之,而与残疾有关的虐待几乎完全由白人女性报告。身体虐待或性虐待的施暴者最有可能是亲密伴侣。与残疾有关的虐待同样归咎于亲密伴侣、护理人员或保健专业人员。本研究的结论是,传统的以虐待为中心的问题和针对残疾的问题都是检测对身体残疾妇女虐待的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maintaining fairness: who gets funded at NIH, and is the process fair? Entertainment outreach for women's health at CDC. Toward optimal health: the experts discuss polycystic ovary syndrome. Ovarian autoimmune disease and ovarian autoantibodies. Biologic and molecular mechanisms for sex differences in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics: Part I.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1