Misconception and Legal Problems of Authority to Perform Medical Actions in Nursing Administrative Law

Hotma P. Sibuea, Dwi Seno Wijanarko, Ali Johardi Wirogioto, Indra Lorenly Nainggolan, Katrina Siagian
{"title":"Misconception and Legal Problems of Authority to Perform Medical Actions in Nursing Administrative Law","authors":"Hotma P. Sibuea, Dwi Seno Wijanarko, Ali Johardi Wirogioto, Indra Lorenly Nainggolan, Katrina Siagian","doi":"10.58344/jws.v2i7.395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law Number 38 of 2014, nurses have several duties, namely as providers of nursing care, counselors and client counselors, managers of nursing services, nursing researchers, and task performers based on delegated authority and/or tasks in specific limited circumstances. One of the nurse's tasks that receives focused attention is \"as a task performer based on delegated authority.\" According to Article 32 paragraph (2) of Law Number 38 of 2014, the implementation of nurse tasks based on delegated authority regulated in Article 29 paragraph (1) letter e of Law Number 38 of 2014 is carried out by nurses in a \"delegative and mandate\" manner. The aim of this research is to identify and analyze misconceptions and legal problems in performing medical actions in nursing administrative law. The research method used is a normative juridical research method. The research results are as follows: First, the term \"delegated authority\" is not accurately used in the context of nurse task implementation for performing medical actions. Second, the more appropriate term is \"cooperation.\" Suggestions that can be put forward are as follows: First, Law Number 38 of 2014 concerning Nursing needs to be amended. Second, the term \"delegated authority\" in the legal relationship between medical personnel and nurses regulated in Article 29 paragraph (1) letter 3 of Law Number 38 of 2014 needs to be changed and replaced with the term \"cooperation.","PeriodicalId":45058,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i7.395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law Number 38 of 2014, nurses have several duties, namely as providers of nursing care, counselors and client counselors, managers of nursing services, nursing researchers, and task performers based on delegated authority and/or tasks in specific limited circumstances. One of the nurse's tasks that receives focused attention is "as a task performer based on delegated authority." According to Article 32 paragraph (2) of Law Number 38 of 2014, the implementation of nurse tasks based on delegated authority regulated in Article 29 paragraph (1) letter e of Law Number 38 of 2014 is carried out by nurses in a "delegative and mandate" manner. The aim of this research is to identify and analyze misconceptions and legal problems in performing medical actions in nursing administrative law. The research method used is a normative juridical research method. The research results are as follows: First, the term "delegated authority" is not accurately used in the context of nurse task implementation for performing medical actions. Second, the more appropriate term is "cooperation." Suggestions that can be put forward are as follows: First, Law Number 38 of 2014 concerning Nursing needs to be amended. Second, the term "delegated authority" in the legal relationship between medical personnel and nurses regulated in Article 29 paragraph (1) letter 3 of Law Number 38 of 2014 needs to be changed and replaced with the term "cooperation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理行政法中医疗行为执行权的误区及法律问题
根据2014年第38号法律第29条第(1)款,护士有几项职责,即作为护理提供者,咨询师和客户咨询师,护理服务经理,护理研究人员以及基于授权和/或特定有限情况下的任务执行者。护士的任务之一是“作为一个基于授权的任务执行者”。根据2014年第38号法律第32条第(2)款,2014年第38号法律第29条第(1)款e字母规定的基于授权的护士任务的实施由护士以“委托和授权”的方式进行。本研究的目的是识别和分析在护理行政法中执行医疗行为的误解和法律问题。本文采用的研究方法是一种规范的法律研究方法。研究结果如下:首先,“授权”一词在护士执行医疗行动的任务实施中使用不准确。第二,更恰当的说法是“合作”。可以提出以下建议:第一,2014年《护理法》第38号需要修改。第二,2014年第38号法律第29条第(1)款第3段规定的医务人员和护士之间法律关系中的"授权"一词需要修改,并用"合作"一词代替。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development
World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of CT Numbers in Thoracic CT Scan Image Segmentation and Spirometry on Pulmonary Vital Capacity Mucinous Tubular and Spindle Cell Carcinoma of Kidney: A Case Report of a Rare Tumor AI'S Healing Touch: Examining Machine Learning's Transformative Effects On Healthcare The impact of Economic Growth, Foreign Investment, Wages, and Human Development Index on Educated Unemployment Generasi Z’s Perception of Dining Experience at Korea Restaurants, South Jakarta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1