Evaluation of the Effects of Different Composite Types on the Shear Bond Strength: An in vitro Study

M. Shahrabi, Behnam Seraj, S. Milani, Seyde Fateme Rezaei Taleshi, Sara Yaghoubirad, Z. Ebrahimi
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effects of Different Composite Types on the Shear Bond Strength: An in vitro Study","authors":"M. Shahrabi, Behnam Seraj, S. Milani, Seyde Fateme Rezaei Taleshi, Sara Yaghoubirad, Z. Ebrahimi","doi":"10.18502/tbsrj.v3i4.7792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this in vitro study was to determine and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of two types of composites. \nMaterial and Methods: Twenty cylindrical samples were prepared and divided into two control and case groups. The case group consisted of 10 cylindrical samples of two types of composites (3M and Vivadent), and the control group, which was divided into two subgroups of 5, included only one type of composite (3M or Vivadent). After preparation, the samples were transferred to the Instron device for testing the SBS. The data were analyzed by SPSS version 15 software using Smirnov-Kolmogorov test for studying the normal distribution of data and t-student test for independent populations. \n Results: Heliomolar (Ivoclar-Vivadent) composite (microfill) showed the lowest SBS, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The highest SBS was for Filtek Z100 (3M ESPE) composite. There were no fracture lines in the interface of the two composites. \n Conclusion: This confirms that proper use of adhesives can prevent fracture in the interface of different composites. So, using two different composite brands on each other does not reduce the bond strength between them.","PeriodicalId":22117,"journal":{"name":"Tabari Biomedical Student Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tabari Biomedical Student Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/tbsrj.v3i4.7792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this in vitro study was to determine and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of two types of composites. Material and Methods: Twenty cylindrical samples were prepared and divided into two control and case groups. The case group consisted of 10 cylindrical samples of two types of composites (3M and Vivadent), and the control group, which was divided into two subgroups of 5, included only one type of composite (3M or Vivadent). After preparation, the samples were transferred to the Instron device for testing the SBS. The data were analyzed by SPSS version 15 software using Smirnov-Kolmogorov test for studying the normal distribution of data and t-student test for independent populations. Results: Heliomolar (Ivoclar-Vivadent) composite (microfill) showed the lowest SBS, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The highest SBS was for Filtek Z100 (3M ESPE) composite. There were no fracture lines in the interface of the two composites. Conclusion: This confirms that proper use of adhesives can prevent fracture in the interface of different composites. So, using two different composite brands on each other does not reduce the bond strength between them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同复合材料类型对剪切粘结强度影响的体外研究
前言:本体外实验的目的是测定和比较两种复合材料的剪切结合强度(SBS)。材料与方法:制备20个圆柱形样本,分为对照组和病例组。病例组由两种复合材料(3M和Vivadent)的10个圆柱形样本组成,对照组分为两个亚组,每组5个,只包括一种复合材料(3M或Vivadent)。制备后,将样品转移到Instron设备上进行SBS测试。数据分析采用SPSS 15版软件,采用Smirnov-Kolmogorov检验研究数据正态分布,采用t-student检验研究独立总体。结果:Heliomolar (Ivoclar-Vivadent)复合材料(microfill)的SBS最低,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。SBS最高的是Filtek Z100 (3M ESPE)复合材料。两种复合材料的界面均未见断口。结论:正确使用胶粘剂可以防止不同复合材料界面的断裂。因此,在彼此之间使用两种不同的复合材料品牌不会降低它们之间的结合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with and without Parkinsonism: A Case-Control Study Investigating the Level of Knowledge and Attitude towards Basic Life Supports and Related Factors in Surgical Technologists and Nurses of Anesthesia at Imam Khomeini Hospital at Tehran during COVID-19 Pandemic Thyroid Nodule Correlation with Serum Prolactin and TPO Antibody Levels: A Case-Control Study Climate Change and the Looming Threat of Cardiovascular Diseases in Iran: A Narrative Review Examining the Knowledge, Attitude, and Performance of Operating Room Personnel about the Use of Personal Communication Devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1