Intersectional Inequalities and Invisibilization in Organizations: The Case of Indian Beauty and Wellness Services

IF 0.7 Q4 MANAGEMENT Irish Journal of Management Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1177/01492063231184811
M. Majumder, Shubhda Arora
{"title":"Intersectional Inequalities and Invisibilization in Organizations: The Case of Indian Beauty and Wellness Services","authors":"M. Majumder, Shubhda Arora","doi":"10.1177/01492063231184811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discourses on social inequalities and the processes that sustain, reproduce, and reify them have been a long-standing area of scholarship. This paper focuses its attention on intersecting inequalities at workplaces and the organizational processes that support and enable their invisibilization. Building on this idea of invisibilization, we take a critical look at the active and conscious work done to keep inequalities hidden within organizations. In doing so, we understand and advance invisibilization as a twin concept that is primarily framed as a power equation but also acts as a visual illusion that obfuscates inequalities. We discuss this obfuscation by exploring intersectional inequalities within the Indian beauty and wellness services (BWS), a majorly unorganized sector that has a visible workforce of women migrants belonging to indigenous communities from the northeast region of the country. Using frameworks of Intersectionality, New Racism, and Othering, we argue that hiring within the BWS normalizes a heteropatriarchal-savarna gaze of the indigenous other, where women are routinely racialized and sexualized to be inducted within the industry. Further, this case study exemplifies how visible frames of gender inequalities invisibilize other ethno-racial, and regional inequalities within workplaces. Building on these findings, we suggest that organizations invisibilize inequalities by (a) co-opting a progressive vocabulary; (b) performing a normalizing function; (c) creating obfuscation; and (d) building a visual facade. Finally, this study contributes by broadening our theoretical understanding of invisibilization, especially in the context of intersectional inequalities, wherein inequalities are normalized through everyday practices within organizational hiring and training, among others.","PeriodicalId":52018,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Management","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231184811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Discourses on social inequalities and the processes that sustain, reproduce, and reify them have been a long-standing area of scholarship. This paper focuses its attention on intersecting inequalities at workplaces and the organizational processes that support and enable their invisibilization. Building on this idea of invisibilization, we take a critical look at the active and conscious work done to keep inequalities hidden within organizations. In doing so, we understand and advance invisibilization as a twin concept that is primarily framed as a power equation but also acts as a visual illusion that obfuscates inequalities. We discuss this obfuscation by exploring intersectional inequalities within the Indian beauty and wellness services (BWS), a majorly unorganized sector that has a visible workforce of women migrants belonging to indigenous communities from the northeast region of the country. Using frameworks of Intersectionality, New Racism, and Othering, we argue that hiring within the BWS normalizes a heteropatriarchal-savarna gaze of the indigenous other, where women are routinely racialized and sexualized to be inducted within the industry. Further, this case study exemplifies how visible frames of gender inequalities invisibilize other ethno-racial, and regional inequalities within workplaces. Building on these findings, we suggest that organizations invisibilize inequalities by (a) co-opting a progressive vocabulary; (b) performing a normalizing function; (c) creating obfuscation; and (d) building a visual facade. Finally, this study contributes by broadening our theoretical understanding of invisibilization, especially in the context of intersectional inequalities, wherein inequalities are normalized through everyday practices within organizational hiring and training, among others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织中的交叉不平等和隐形:印度美容和健康服务的案例
关于社会不平等及其维持、再现和具体化过程的论述一直是一个长期存在的学术领域。本文将重点关注工作场所的交叉不平等以及支持和使其隐形的组织过程。基于这种不可见的理念,我们将以批判性的眼光审视为保持组织内部不平等所做的积极和有意识的工作。在这样做的过程中,我们理解并推进了隐形作为一个双重概念,主要是作为一个权力方程式,但也作为一种视觉错觉,混淆了不平等。我们通过探索印度美容和健康服务(BWS)内部的交叉不平等来讨论这种混淆,BWS是一个主要无组织的部门,拥有来自该国东北地区土著社区的女性移民的明显劳动力。使用交叉性、新种族主义和其他框架,我们认为,在BWS内部招聘使土著他人的异父权制-稀树草原凝视正常化,在那里,女性通常被种族化和性别化,以进入该行业。此外,本案例研究举例说明了性别不平等的可见框架如何掩盖了工作场所中其他民族-种族和地区的不平等。基于这些发现,我们建议组织通过以下方式将不平等现象隐形化:(a)采用进步词汇;(b)执行归一化功能;(c)制造混淆;(d)建立一个视觉立面。最后,本研究拓宽了我们对隐形化的理论理解,特别是在交叉不平等的背景下,其中不平等通过组织招聘和培训等日常实践而正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Mental health disclosure in the workplace – An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the employee experience Oh the Anxiety! The Anxiety of Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality and Mitigating Effects of Ethical Leadership Give Peace a Chance? How Regulatory Foci Influence Organizational Conflict Events in Intractable Conflict Environments Geographic Distance and State's Grip: Information Asymmetry, State Inattention, and Firm Implementation of State Policy From Home to Corner Office: How Work–Life Programs Influence Women's Managerial Representation in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1