The Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Toolkit: embedding stakeholder engagement and co-production of improvement plans in European midwifery units

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evidence & Policy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1332/174426421x16448363973807
Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho, C. Yuill, Ellen Thaels, Nazihah Uddin
{"title":"The Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Toolkit: embedding stakeholder engagement and co-production of improvement plans in European midwifery units","authors":"Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho, C. Yuill, Ellen Thaels, Nazihah Uddin","doi":"10.1332/174426421x16448363973807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: For women with straightforward pregnancies midwifery units (MUs) are associated with improved maternal outcomes and experiences, similar neonatal outcomes, and lower costs than obstetric units. There is growing interest and promotion of MUs and midwifery-led care among European health policymakers and healthcare systems, and units are being developed and opened in countries for the first time or are increasing in number. To support this implementation, it is crucial that practice guidelines and improvement frameworks are in place, in order to ensure that MUs are and remain well-functioning.Aims and objectives: This project focused on the stakeholder engagement and collaboration with MUs to implement the Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Tool in European MUs. A rapid participatory appraisal was conducted with midwives and stakeholders from European MUs to explore the clarity and usability of the tool, to understand how it helps MUs identifying areas for further improvement, and to identify the degree of support maternity services need in this process.Key conclusions: Engagement and co-production principles used in the case studies were perceived as empowering by all stakeholders. A fresh-eye view from the external facilitators on dynamics within the MU and its relationship with the obstetric unit was highly valued. However, micro-, meso- and macro-levels of organisational change and their associated stakeholders need to be further represented in the MUSA-Tool. The improvement plans generated from it should also reflect these micro-, meso- and macro-level considerations in order to identify the key actors for further implementation and integration of MUs into European health services.Key messagesEngagement and co-production principles used in the case studies were perceived as empowering by all stakeholders.A fresh-eye view from the external facilitators were highly valued by stakeholders.Micro-meso-macro levels of change need to be further represented in the MUSA-Tool.The high impact actions need to reflect the micro-meso-macro levels to identify the correct players.","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421x16448363973807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: For women with straightforward pregnancies midwifery units (MUs) are associated with improved maternal outcomes and experiences, similar neonatal outcomes, and lower costs than obstetric units. There is growing interest and promotion of MUs and midwifery-led care among European health policymakers and healthcare systems, and units are being developed and opened in countries for the first time or are increasing in number. To support this implementation, it is crucial that practice guidelines and improvement frameworks are in place, in order to ensure that MUs are and remain well-functioning.Aims and objectives: This project focused on the stakeholder engagement and collaboration with MUs to implement the Midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Tool in European MUs. A rapid participatory appraisal was conducted with midwives and stakeholders from European MUs to explore the clarity and usability of the tool, to understand how it helps MUs identifying areas for further improvement, and to identify the degree of support maternity services need in this process.Key conclusions: Engagement and co-production principles used in the case studies were perceived as empowering by all stakeholders. A fresh-eye view from the external facilitators on dynamics within the MU and its relationship with the obstetric unit was highly valued. However, micro-, meso- and macro-levels of organisational change and their associated stakeholders need to be further represented in the MUSA-Tool. The improvement plans generated from it should also reflect these micro-, meso- and macro-level considerations in order to identify the key actors for further implementation and integration of MUs into European health services.Key messagesEngagement and co-production principles used in the case studies were perceived as empowering by all stakeholders.A fresh-eye view from the external facilitators were highly valued by stakeholders.Micro-meso-macro levels of change need to be further represented in the MUSA-Tool.The high impact actions need to reflect the micro-meso-macro levels to identify the correct players.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产单位自我评估(MUSA)工具包:嵌入利益相关者参与和共同生产的改进计划在欧洲助产单位
背景:对于直接怀孕的妇女,与产科单位相比,助产单位(MUs)与改善的产妇结局和经验、相似的新生儿结局和更低的费用相关。欧洲卫生政策制定者和卫生保健系统对MUs和助产士主导的护理越来越感兴趣和促进,并且正在各国首次开发和开设单位或数量正在增加。为了支持这一实施,至关重要的是制定实践指南和改进框架,以确保MUs正在并保持良好的运作。目的和目标:本项目侧重于利益相关者的参与和与MUs的合作,以在欧洲MUs实施助产单位自我评估(MUSA)工具。与来自欧洲医院的助产士和利益相关者一起进行了快速参与性评估,以探索该工具的清晰度和可用性,了解它如何帮助医院确定需要进一步改进的领域,并确定在此过程中需要的支持程度。主要结论:案例研究中使用的参与和合作原则被所有利益相关者视为赋予权力。外部促进者对联合妇产科内部动态及其与产科单位关系的新看法受到高度重视。然而,组织变革的微观、中观和宏观层面及其相关的利益相关者需要在musa工具中得到进一步的体现。由此产生的改进计划也应反映这些微观、中观和宏观层面的考虑,以便确定进一步实施和将最低标准纳入欧洲保健服务的关键行为体。关键信息案例研究中使用的参与和合作原则被所有利益相关者视为授权。利益相关者高度重视外部促进者的新视角。微观、中观和宏观层面的变化需要进一步体现在微观、中观和宏观层面的工具中。高影响行动需要反映微观-中观-宏观层面,以识别正确的玩家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Breaking the Overton Window: on the need for adversarial co-production Examining research systems and models for local government: a systematic review Experiences and perceptions of evidence use among senior health service decision makers in Ireland: a qualitative study The critical factors in producing high quality and policy-relevant research: insights from international behavioural science units Understanding brokers, intermediaries, and boundary spanners: a multi-sectoral review of strategies, skills, and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1