The Characteristics of Patient with Macular Hole After Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) and Internal Limiting Membran (ILM) Peeling in Cicendo Eye Hospital National Eye Center, Bandung
{"title":"The Characteristics of Patient with Macular Hole After Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) and Internal Limiting Membran (ILM) Peeling in Cicendo Eye Hospital National Eye Center, Bandung","authors":"Rani Pitta Omas","doi":"10.35479/IJRETINA.2019.VOL002.ISS001.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Macular hole (MH) can cause severe visual disturbance, but remarkable progress has been achieved in surgical treatment for eyes with this condition. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling allows a very high success rate for MH closure (approaching 90%). To compare characteristics patients with closed and unclosed macular hole after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) surgery and internal limiting membran (ILM) peeling. \nMethod : This was retrospective study which data was obtain from patient’s medical records who underwent PPV and ILM peeling since July 1st to December 31th 2018. \nResults : 27 eyes from 25 patients had MH surgery. 20 eyes (74%) had closed MH and 7 (26%) eyes unclosed MH after surgery. HFF value before surgery was 1,34 ± 0,90 and MHI was 1,09 ± 0,81 in closed MH. Meanwhile in unclosed MH, HFF value before surgery 0,53 ± 0,12 and MHI was 0,75 ±0,10. MHI ≥0,5 and HFF value ≥ 0,9 had a good prognostic factor. \nConclusion : Despite of good prognostic factor from OCT measurement and achieve anatomical success, foveal microstructure also important in visual recovery after MH surgery.","PeriodicalId":33128,"journal":{"name":"IJRETINA International Journal of Retina","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJRETINA International Journal of Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35479/IJRETINA.2019.VOL002.ISS001.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction : Macular hole (MH) can cause severe visual disturbance, but remarkable progress has been achieved in surgical treatment for eyes with this condition. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling allows a very high success rate for MH closure (approaching 90%). To compare characteristics patients with closed and unclosed macular hole after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) surgery and internal limiting membran (ILM) peeling.
Method : This was retrospective study which data was obtain from patient’s medical records who underwent PPV and ILM peeling since July 1st to December 31th 2018.
Results : 27 eyes from 25 patients had MH surgery. 20 eyes (74%) had closed MH and 7 (26%) eyes unclosed MH after surgery. HFF value before surgery was 1,34 ± 0,90 and MHI was 1,09 ± 0,81 in closed MH. Meanwhile in unclosed MH, HFF value before surgery 0,53 ± 0,12 and MHI was 0,75 ±0,10. MHI ≥0,5 and HFF value ≥ 0,9 had a good prognostic factor.
Conclusion : Despite of good prognostic factor from OCT measurement and achieve anatomical success, foveal microstructure also important in visual recovery after MH surgery.