Le plan d’action personnalisé écrit (P.A.P.E.)

L. Réfabert
{"title":"Le plan d’action personnalisé écrit (P.A.P.E.)","authors":"L. Réfabert","doi":"10.1016/j.allerg.2008.01.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>All asthma consensus statements recommend the use of a written action plan. Patients tend to have a positive perception regarding the use of action plans for asthma. They find that action plans are useful for the management of their asthma. Nevertheless, an action plan should not be viewed as the only element in self-management strategy. It is usually part of a multifaceted intervention, including therapeutic education sessions, medical review and prescription of medications. A recent meta-analysis reported a positive effect of the use of written action plans. It is agreed that a written action plan should be tailored to each individual patient and to the type and severity of his asthma. Still, the precise elements of action plans that are responsible for their benefit have not yet been clearly identified. However, considering the different action plans that have been published, it would appear reasonable to build on prior experience and adopt a three-step approach, such as a sequence of stoplight colours, as a means to compare one action plan with others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92953,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise d'allergologie et d'immunologie clinique","volume":"48 3","pages":"Pages 232-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.allerg.2008.01.019","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise d'allergologie et d'immunologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0335745708000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

All asthma consensus statements recommend the use of a written action plan. Patients tend to have a positive perception regarding the use of action plans for asthma. They find that action plans are useful for the management of their asthma. Nevertheless, an action plan should not be viewed as the only element in self-management strategy. It is usually part of a multifaceted intervention, including therapeutic education sessions, medical review and prescription of medications. A recent meta-analysis reported a positive effect of the use of written action plans. It is agreed that a written action plan should be tailored to each individual patient and to the type and severity of his asthma. Still, the precise elements of action plans that are responsible for their benefit have not yet been clearly identified. However, considering the different action plans that have been published, it would appear reasonable to build on prior experience and adopt a three-step approach, such as a sequence of stoplight colours, as a means to compare one action plan with others.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人行动计划(P.A.P.E.)
所有哮喘共识声明都建议使用书面行动计划。患者往往对使用哮喘行动计划有积极的看法。他们发现行动计划对控制他们的哮喘很有用。然而,行动计划不应被视为自我管理战略的唯一因素。它通常是多方面干预的一部分,包括治疗教育会议、医学审查和药物处方。最近的一项荟萃分析报告了使用书面行动计划的积极效果。大家一致认为,书面行动计划应针对每位患者及其哮喘的类型和严重程度量身定制。尽管如此,行动计划的具体要素仍未被清楚地确定。然而,考虑到已经发布的不同的行动计划,似乎合理的做法是建立在先前的经验,并采取三步走的方法,如红灯颜色的顺序,作为一种手段,比较一个行动计划与其他行动计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Page tournée et nouveaux rendez-vous L’enseignement de l’allergologie pendant les études médicales en France Toux chronique de l’adulte et reflux gastro-œsophagien Les frontières du bilan allergologique en allergo-anesthésie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1