Analyzing the Performance of a Temperature and Humidity Measuring System of a Smart Greenhouse for Strawberry Cultivation

Y. Jeong, 정 영균, Jong Goo Lee, Enu Ki Ahn, Jae Seok Seo, H. Kim, Y. Yoon, 이 종구, 안 은기, 서 재석, 김 현태, 윤 용철
{"title":"Analyzing the Performance of a Temperature and Humidity Measuring System of a Smart Greenhouse for Strawberry Cultivation","authors":"Y. Jeong, 정 영균, Jong Goo Lee, Enu Ki Ahn, Jae Seok Seo, H. Kim, Y. Yoon, 이 종구, 안 은기, 서 재석, 김 현태, 윤 용철","doi":"10.12791/KSBEC.2019.28.2.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared the temperature and humidity measured by an aspirated radiation shield (ARS), the accuracy of which has been recently verified, and those measured by a system developed by the parent company (Company A) to investigate and improve the performance of the developed system. The results are as follows. Overall, the two-plate system had a lower radiation shielding effect than the one-plate system but showed better performance results when excluding the effect of strawberry vegetation on the systems. The overall maximum temperature ranges measured by company A’s system and the ARS were 20.5~53.3C and 17.8~44.1C, respectively. Thus, the maximum temperature measured by company A’s system was 2.7~9.2C higher, and the maximum daily temperature difference was approximately 12.2C. The overall average temperature measured by company A’s system and the ARS was 12.4~38.6C and 11.8~32.7C, respectively. Thus, the overall average temperature measured by company A’s system was 0.6~5.9C higher, and the maximum daily temperature difference was approximately 6.7C. The overall minimum temperature ranges measured by company A’s system and the ARS were 4.2~28.6C and 2.9~26.4C, respectively. Thus, the minimum temperature measured by company A’s system was 1.3~2.2C higher, and the minimum daily temperature difference was approximately 2.9C. In addition, the overall relative humidity ranges measured by company A’s system and the ARS were 52.9~93.3% and 55.3~96.5%, respectively. Thus, company A’s system showed a 2.4~3.2% lower relative humidity range than the ARS. However, there was a day when the relative humidity measured by company A’s system was 18.0% lower than that measured by the ARS at maximum. In conclusion, there were differences in the relative humidity measured by the two company’s devices, as in the temperature, although the differences were insignificant. Additional key words : aspirated radiation shield, numbers of plates, relative humidity, solar radiation, temperature","PeriodicalId":20654,"journal":{"name":"Protected horticulture and Plant Factory","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protected horticulture and Plant Factory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2019.28.2.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study compared the temperature and humidity measured by an aspirated radiation shield (ARS), the accuracy of which has been recently verified, and those measured by a system developed by the parent company (Company A) to investigate and improve the performance of the developed system. The results are as follows. Overall, the two-plate system had a lower radiation shielding effect than the one-plate system but showed better performance results when excluding the effect of strawberry vegetation on the systems. The overall maximum temperature ranges measured by company A’s system and the ARS were 20.5~53.3C and 17.8~44.1C, respectively. Thus, the maximum temperature measured by company A’s system was 2.7~9.2C higher, and the maximum daily temperature difference was approximately 12.2C. The overall average temperature measured by company A’s system and the ARS was 12.4~38.6C and 11.8~32.7C, respectively. Thus, the overall average temperature measured by company A’s system was 0.6~5.9C higher, and the maximum daily temperature difference was approximately 6.7C. The overall minimum temperature ranges measured by company A’s system and the ARS were 4.2~28.6C and 2.9~26.4C, respectively. Thus, the minimum temperature measured by company A’s system was 1.3~2.2C higher, and the minimum daily temperature difference was approximately 2.9C. In addition, the overall relative humidity ranges measured by company A’s system and the ARS were 52.9~93.3% and 55.3~96.5%, respectively. Thus, company A’s system showed a 2.4~3.2% lower relative humidity range than the ARS. However, there was a day when the relative humidity measured by company A’s system was 18.0% lower than that measured by the ARS at maximum. In conclusion, there were differences in the relative humidity measured by the two company’s devices, as in the temperature, although the differences were insignificant. Additional key words : aspirated radiation shield, numbers of plates, relative humidity, solar radiation, temperature
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
草莓栽培智能温室温湿度测量系统性能分析
本研究比较了吸收式辐射屏蔽(ARS)测量的温度和湿度,其准确性最近已得到验证,与母公司(a公司)开发的系统测量的温度和湿度进行了比较,以研究和改进所开发系统的性能。结果如下:总体而言,两板系统的辐射屏蔽效果低于一板系统,但在排除草莓植被对两板系统的影响后,两板系统的屏蔽效果更好。A公司的系统和ARS测得的整体最高温度范围分别为20.5~53.3C和17.8~44.1C。因此,A公司系统测得的最高温度高出2.7~9.2C,最大日温差约为12.2C。A公司的系统和ARS测得的整体平均温度分别为12.4~38.6℃和11.8~32.7℃。因此,A公司系统测得的整体平均温度高出0.6~5.9℃,最大日温差约6.7℃。A公司的系统和ARS测量的整体最低温度范围分别为4.2~28.6C和2.9~26.4C。因此,A公司的系统测得的最低温度高出1.3~2.2C,日温差最小约为2.9C。此外,A公司系统和ARS测量的总体相对湿度范围分别为52.9~93.3%和55.3~96.5%。因此,A公司的系统的相对湿度范围比ARS低2.4~3.2%。然而,有一天,a公司的系统测量到的相对湿度最大时比ARS测量到的相对湿度低18.0%。总之,两家公司的设备测量的相对湿度和温度存在差异,尽管差异微不足道。附加关键词:吸气式辐射屏蔽,板数,相对湿度,太阳辐射,温度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seeding, seedling production and transplanting Biological factor management Micro- and mini-PFALs for improving the quality of life in urban areas Physical environmental factors and their properties Role of the plant factory with artificial lighting (PFAL) in urban areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1