Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Lever Brothers and Unilever Ltd: A practical problem of source

E. M. Stack, D. Grenville, R. Poole, H. Harnett, E. Horn
{"title":"Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Lever Brothers and Unilever Ltd: A practical problem of source","authors":"E. M. Stack, D. Grenville, R. Poole, H. Harnett, E. Horn","doi":"10.25159/1998-8125/5795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lever Brothers, the South African tax case that formed the basis of this research, was concerned with determining the source of interest income. In its time, this was one of the landmark cases and established tax principles that were valid for 54 years, until superseded by changes to legislation20The research presented a critical analysis of the three judgments in the case, exposing weaknesses in each. It also provided a condensed account of the history of the company, the historical era in which the transactions giving rise to the case took place, a glimpse into the lives of the judges, as well as a discussion of the development in South Africa of the rules for determining source. The most important focus of the research was the discussion of the use and validity of the practical man principle, and it was concluded that this principle should be applied, not in lieu of legal theory, but to restrain its unbridled use when unjust results would ensue.","PeriodicalId":44582,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Business Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/5795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Lever Brothers, the South African tax case that formed the basis of this research, was concerned with determining the source of interest income. In its time, this was one of the landmark cases and established tax principles that were valid for 54 years, until superseded by changes to legislation20The research presented a critical analysis of the three judgments in the case, exposing weaknesses in each. It also provided a condensed account of the history of the company, the historical era in which the transactions giving rise to the case took place, a glimpse into the lives of the judges, as well as a discussion of the development in South Africa of the rules for determining source. The most important focus of the research was the discussion of the use and validity of the practical man principle, and it was concluded that this principle should be applied, not in lieu of legal theory, but to restrain its unbridled use when unjust results would ensue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
税务局局长诉利华兄弟和联合利华有限公司:一个实际的来源问题
利弗兄弟(Lever Brothers)案,即构成本研究基础的南非税务案,关注的是确定利息收入的来源。在当时,这是具有里程碑意义的案件之一,并确立了有效54年的税收原则,直到被立法变化所取代。该研究对案件中的三个判决进行了批判性分析,揭示了每个判决的弱点。它还简要介绍了该公司的历史、导致此案的交易发生的历史时代、对法官生活的一瞥,以及对南非确定来源规则的发展的讨论。研究的最重要的焦点是讨论实践者原则的使用和有效性,得出的结论是,应用这一原则不是代替法律理论,而是在出现不公正结果时限制其肆无忌惮的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Improving Automotive Component Supplier Service through Physical Distribution Activities to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) The Role of Social Network Brand Personality in a Consumer-Brand Relational Model Value Network Configuration and Competitiveness of Emerging Agricultural Cooperatives in the Central Free State of South Africa Incubate-Based Challenges and Deficiencies to Successful Business Incubation in Northern Cape, South Africa Institutional Isomorphism and Adoption of Activity-Based Costing in Tanzanian Manufacturing Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1