The Impact of Severe Hypertriglyceridemia on Glycosylated Hemoglobin Test in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

A. Salim
{"title":"The Impact of Severe Hypertriglyceridemia on Glycosylated Hemoglobin Test in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"A. Salim","doi":"10.33762/mjbu.2023.134409.1118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: although the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) test is a valid test for diabetes diagnosis and evaluation of glycemic control, many factors are known to affect the results of the HbA1c test and make it reflects a false image of the glycemic control. One of these factors is hypertriglyceridemia. Objectives: the study aims to assess the impact of severe hypertriglyceridemia (TG ≥ 1000 mg/dl) on HbA1c test results in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Method: a retrospective study on two groups of adult patients with type 2 DM; were implemented in Faiha Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism Centre (FDEMC) in Basrah–Iraq. A total of 267 patients with type 2 DM and severe hypertriglyceridemia and a total of 313 patients with type 2 DM and normal triglycerides levels were included. Then the mean HbA1c of the patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia was measured in each FBS range and compared to the mean HbA1c of the patients with normal triglycerides levels in the same FBS range to determine the impact of severe hypertriglyceridemia on the readings of HbA1c in the diabetic patients. Results: t he mean HbA1c in both groups was compared in each FBS range and revealed that despite of recording nearly the same mean FBS, HbA1c was higher in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia by 1.33% in the FBS range 130-149 mg/dl with a statistically significant p-value = 0.003. While it was lower in the FBS range 200-229 mg/dl, 230-259 mg/dl, 260-299 mg/dl, 300-349 mg/dl and 350-399 mg/dl by 1.02%, 0.85%, 1.77%, 2.29% and 2.23%, respectively with a statistically significant p-value that equal to 0.005, 0.034, < 0.001, < 0.001 and 0.039, respectively. Conclusion: t his study reveal that severe hypertriglyceridemia has a significant impact on HbA1c test results. The HbA1c values in diabetic patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia are unpredictable.","PeriodicalId":33859,"journal":{"name":"The Medical Journal of Basrah University","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical Journal of Basrah University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33762/mjbu.2023.134409.1118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: although the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) test is a valid test for diabetes diagnosis and evaluation of glycemic control, many factors are known to affect the results of the HbA1c test and make it reflects a false image of the glycemic control. One of these factors is hypertriglyceridemia. Objectives: the study aims to assess the impact of severe hypertriglyceridemia (TG ≥ 1000 mg/dl) on HbA1c test results in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Method: a retrospective study on two groups of adult patients with type 2 DM; were implemented in Faiha Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism Centre (FDEMC) in Basrah–Iraq. A total of 267 patients with type 2 DM and severe hypertriglyceridemia and a total of 313 patients with type 2 DM and normal triglycerides levels were included. Then the mean HbA1c of the patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia was measured in each FBS range and compared to the mean HbA1c of the patients with normal triglycerides levels in the same FBS range to determine the impact of severe hypertriglyceridemia on the readings of HbA1c in the diabetic patients. Results: t he mean HbA1c in both groups was compared in each FBS range and revealed that despite of recording nearly the same mean FBS, HbA1c was higher in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia by 1.33% in the FBS range 130-149 mg/dl with a statistically significant p-value = 0.003. While it was lower in the FBS range 200-229 mg/dl, 230-259 mg/dl, 260-299 mg/dl, 300-349 mg/dl and 350-399 mg/dl by 1.02%, 0.85%, 1.77%, 2.29% and 2.23%, respectively with a statistically significant p-value that equal to 0.005, 0.034, < 0.001, < 0.001 and 0.039, respectively. Conclusion: t his study reveal that severe hypertriglyceridemia has a significant impact on HbA1c test results. The HbA1c values in diabetic patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia are unpredictable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重度高甘油三酯血症对2型糖尿病糖化血红蛋白试验的影响
背景:虽然糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测是诊断糖尿病和评估血糖控制的有效检测,但已知许多因素会影响HbA1c检测结果,使其反映出血糖控制的错误图像。其中一个因素是高甘油三酯血症。目的:本研究旨在评估重度高甘油三酯血症(TG≥1000 mg/dl)对2型糖尿病患者HbA1c检测结果的影响。方法:对两组成人2型糖尿病患者进行回顾性研究;在伊拉克巴士拉的Faiha糖尿病、内分泌和代谢中心实施。共纳入267例2型糖尿病合并严重高甘油三酯血症患者和313例2型糖尿病合并甘油三酯水平正常患者。然后在每个FBS范围内测量严重高甘油三酯血症患者的平均HbA1c,并与相同FBS范围内甘油三酯水平正常患者的平均HbA1c进行比较,以确定严重高甘油三酯血症对糖尿病患者HbA1c读数的影响。结果:比较两组在FBS各范围内的平均HbA1c,发现尽管记录的平均FBS几乎相同,但在FBS 130-149 mg/dl范围内,严重高甘油三酯血症患者的HbA1c高1.33%,p值= 0.003,具有统计学意义。而在FBS范围200-229 mg/dl、230-259 mg/dl、260-299 mg/dl、300-349 mg/dl和350-399 mg/dl分别降低了1.02%、0.85%、1.77%、2.29%和2.23%,p值分别为0.005、0.034、< 0.001、< 0.001和0.039,具有统计学意义。结论:本研究提示重度高甘油三酯血症对HbA1c检测结果有显著影响。糖尿病合并严重高甘油三酯血症患者的HbA1c值是不可预测的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding COVID-19 outbreak among people in Basrah city Association of serum uric acid with markers of inflammations And disease severity in ankylosing spondylitis patients The Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Acne Vulgaris – A Comparative Study prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients attending a cardiology clinic. Prevalence and predictors of severe metabolic acidosis in chronic kidney disease stage 3-5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1