If Not Now, When? A Call to End Social Work’s Tolerance of White Supremacy in the Academy

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Critical and Radical Social Work Pub Date : 2022-09-22 DOI:10.22329/csw.v23i1.7586
Antonio Garcia, S. Barnhart, Natalie Pope, K. Showalter, Alma Ouanesisouk Trinadad
{"title":"If Not Now, When? A Call to End Social Work’s Tolerance of White Supremacy in the Academy","authors":"Antonio Garcia, S. Barnhart, Natalie Pope, K. Showalter, Alma Ouanesisouk Trinadad","doi":"10.22329/csw.v23i1.7586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite ethical responsibilities to dismantle systems of oppression, White supremacy ideologies and practices are still inundated in social work academe to the detriment of Black, Indigenous, Latino, and Persons of Color (BILPOC) communities and faculty dedicated to teaching the next generation of critical scholars, activists, and clinicians. Four themes are introduced to exemplify how the academy remains overpowered by the need to sustain the status quo of White power. In the first theme, social work’s long-standing history of omitting BILPOC experiences in curricula is discussed. The second theme characterizes social work’s legacy of omission via inaction to address unjust governmental practices at the U.S. Southern border, thereby perpetuating the cycle of White power. Cementing these positions, we shift the discussion to the inherent pressures within the academy that prizes productivity above all else, perpetuating the culture of White supremacy. In turn, spaces to engage in creative thinking and teaching to dismantle systems of oppressions are limited. Lastly, we discuss the increasing pressure to produce “eurocentric” rigorous scientific knowledge takes precedence at a time when we must place equity and fairness on equal footing. For each of these four themes, we offer suggestions for how to create spaces for racial reconciliation, healing, and equality.","PeriodicalId":44175,"journal":{"name":"Critical and Radical Social Work","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical and Radical Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v23i1.7586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite ethical responsibilities to dismantle systems of oppression, White supremacy ideologies and practices are still inundated in social work academe to the detriment of Black, Indigenous, Latino, and Persons of Color (BILPOC) communities and faculty dedicated to teaching the next generation of critical scholars, activists, and clinicians. Four themes are introduced to exemplify how the academy remains overpowered by the need to sustain the status quo of White power. In the first theme, social work’s long-standing history of omitting BILPOC experiences in curricula is discussed. The second theme characterizes social work’s legacy of omission via inaction to address unjust governmental practices at the U.S. Southern border, thereby perpetuating the cycle of White power. Cementing these positions, we shift the discussion to the inherent pressures within the academy that prizes productivity above all else, perpetuating the culture of White supremacy. In turn, spaces to engage in creative thinking and teaching to dismantle systems of oppressions are limited. Lastly, we discuss the increasing pressure to produce “eurocentric” rigorous scientific knowledge takes precedence at a time when we must place equity and fairness on equal footing. For each of these four themes, we offer suggestions for how to create spaces for racial reconciliation, healing, and equality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如果不是现在,会是什么时候?呼吁结束学院社会工作对白人至上主义的容忍
尽管在道德上有责任消除压迫制度,但白人至上的意识形态和实践仍然充斥在社会工作学术界,不利于黑人、土著、拉丁裔和有色人种(BILPOC)社区和致力于培养下一代批判性学者、活动家和临床医生的教师。介绍了四个主题,以说明学术界如何仍然被维持白人权力现状的需要所压倒。在第一个主题中,讨论了社会工作在课程中忽略BILPOC经验的长期历史。第二个主题描述了社会工作在解决美国南部边境不公正的政府行为方面的不作为,从而使白人权力的循环永久化。在巩固这些立场的同时,我们将讨论转移到学术界内部的内在压力上,这种压力把生产力看得高于一切,使白人至上的文化永久化。反过来,从事创造性思维和教学以拆除压迫制度的空间是有限的。最后,我们讨论了在我们必须将公平和公平置于平等地位的时候,产生“以欧洲为中心”的严格科学知识的压力越来越大。对于这四个主题,我们都提出了如何创造种族和解、治愈和平等的空间的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Talking about needs and rights in inter-agency meetings: interpretive contests in Swedish welfare provision Maybe you can be too resilient: a sociological investigation into how student social workers perceive resilience in their practice Critique and Critical Social Work: a meta-theoretical perspective Who’s right? What rights? How? Rights debates in Irish social work: a call for nuance Lordship and bondage in the dialectics of social work: regulation and professional autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1