A Simulation Study of the Effect of Injecting Carbon Dioxide with Nitrogen or Lean Gas on the Minimum Miscibility Pressure

Ahmed Gh Mansour, T. Gamadi, Hussain R Saoyleh
{"title":"A Simulation Study of the Effect of Injecting Carbon Dioxide with Nitrogen or Lean Gas on the Minimum Miscibility Pressure","authors":"Ahmed Gh Mansour, T. Gamadi, Hussain R Saoyleh","doi":"10.2118/200984-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of this study is to determine the effects of the concentration of injected gases on recovery factors. CO2 has been used for flooding because it requires low injection pressures to achieve miscibility. However, the availability of CO2 is an issue. CO2 required for the process is not sufficient for the reservoir under consideration. Moreover, its benefit-cost ratio (b/c) represents another issue; higher volumes of CO2 increases the economic expenditures. An alternative is to inject lean gas or nitrogen along with CO2 to achieve better recoveries at optimum costs and suitable pressure.\n Slim tube simulation using a commercial simulator is utilized to measure the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of an injected gas mixture. The mixture contains CO2/N2 or CO2/lean gas. Using different concentrations in the injected mixture, an effect on the recovery factor is studied. The first 30 runs have 100% concentration of each individual gases i.e. N2, CO2 and lean gas. Based on these runs, the simulation model is validated using the co-relations present in the literature. Gas mixtures of CO2/N2 and CO2/lean gas were then simulated using the compositional model to test the effect on MMP by varying the concentration of each gas in the mixture. By changing the volumes of the gas in the injected mixture, we can find the optimum concentration of each component in the mixture in terms of MMP.\n From the results obtained through simulation, it can be deduced that higher percentages of CO2 in the mixture would result in reduced minimum miscibility pressure. The addition of a secondary slug to the injected CO2 fluid increases the pressure required to achieve miscibility. Of N2 and Lean gas, Lean gas provided better results as it showed low miscibility pressure responses compared to the same amount of N2 gas. For example, for a case, 50% CO2 and 50 %N2 or lean gas mixture, the MMP for the lean gas mixture is 3500 Psi, while for N2 mixture it was 4667 Psi. However, lean gas is expensive as compared to N2 and N2 is easily available. N2, if used in optimum concentration along with CO2 can produce greater recoveries keeping the process cost-effective while satisfying other constraints. CO2 is widely used for miscible injection, but it presents problems like costs, corrosion, and asphaltene deposition etc. The study can give an idea of the success of carrying out EOR through gas flooding by using N2 and CO2 to enhance recovery at low cost. N2 is easily available from air and it is cheap.","PeriodicalId":11075,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, June 28, 2021","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, June 28, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200984-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the effects of the concentration of injected gases on recovery factors. CO2 has been used for flooding because it requires low injection pressures to achieve miscibility. However, the availability of CO2 is an issue. CO2 required for the process is not sufficient for the reservoir under consideration. Moreover, its benefit-cost ratio (b/c) represents another issue; higher volumes of CO2 increases the economic expenditures. An alternative is to inject lean gas or nitrogen along with CO2 to achieve better recoveries at optimum costs and suitable pressure. Slim tube simulation using a commercial simulator is utilized to measure the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of an injected gas mixture. The mixture contains CO2/N2 or CO2/lean gas. Using different concentrations in the injected mixture, an effect on the recovery factor is studied. The first 30 runs have 100% concentration of each individual gases i.e. N2, CO2 and lean gas. Based on these runs, the simulation model is validated using the co-relations present in the literature. Gas mixtures of CO2/N2 and CO2/lean gas were then simulated using the compositional model to test the effect on MMP by varying the concentration of each gas in the mixture. By changing the volumes of the gas in the injected mixture, we can find the optimum concentration of each component in the mixture in terms of MMP. From the results obtained through simulation, it can be deduced that higher percentages of CO2 in the mixture would result in reduced minimum miscibility pressure. The addition of a secondary slug to the injected CO2 fluid increases the pressure required to achieve miscibility. Of N2 and Lean gas, Lean gas provided better results as it showed low miscibility pressure responses compared to the same amount of N2 gas. For example, for a case, 50% CO2 and 50 %N2 or lean gas mixture, the MMP for the lean gas mixture is 3500 Psi, while for N2 mixture it was 4667 Psi. However, lean gas is expensive as compared to N2 and N2 is easily available. N2, if used in optimum concentration along with CO2 can produce greater recoveries keeping the process cost-effective while satisfying other constraints. CO2 is widely used for miscible injection, but it presents problems like costs, corrosion, and asphaltene deposition etc. The study can give an idea of the success of carrying out EOR through gas flooding by using N2 and CO2 to enhance recovery at low cost. N2 is easily available from air and it is cheap.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以氮气或贫气注入二氧化碳对最小混相压力影响的模拟研究
本研究的目的是确定注入气体浓度对采收率的影响。二氧化碳已被用于驱油,因为它需要较低的注入压力才能实现混相。然而,二氧化碳的可用性是一个问题。该过程所需的二氧化碳对于所考虑的储层来说是不够的。此外,它的效益成本比率(b/c)是另一个问题;较高的二氧化碳排放量增加了经济支出。另一种方法是在注入二氧化碳的同时注入稀薄气体或氮气,以在最佳成本和合适压力下实现更好的采收率。利用商用模拟器进行细管模拟,测量了注入气体混合物的最小混相压力(MMP)。混合物中含有CO2/N2或CO2/稀薄气体。研究了注入混合物中不同浓度对采收率的影响。前30次运行中,每一种气体即N2、CO2和贫气的浓度都达到100%。基于这些运行,使用文献中存在的相关关系验证了仿真模型。然后使用成分模型模拟CO2/N2和CO2/贫气的混合气体,通过改变混合气体中每种气体的浓度来测试对MMP的影响。通过改变注入混合物中气体的体积,我们可以根据MMP找到混合物中各组分的最佳浓度。通过模拟得到的结果可以推断,混合物中CO2含量越高,最小混相压力越低。在注入的二氧化碳流体中加入二次段塞,增加了实现混相所需的压力。在氮气和贫气中,贫气表现出较低的混相压力响应,效果较好。例如,在50% CO2和50% N2或贫气混合物的情况下,贫气混合物的MMP为3500 Psi,而N2混合物的MMP为4667 Psi。然而,与氮气相比,贫气价格昂贵,而且氮气很容易获得。N2,如果以最佳浓度与CO2一起使用,可以产生更高的回收率,在满足其他限制条件的同时保持该过程的成本效益。二氧化碳被广泛用于混相注入,但存在成本、腐蚀和沥青质沉积等问题。该研究为利用氮气和二氧化碳以低成本提高采收率的气驱提高采收率的成功提供了思路。氮气很容易从空气中获得,而且很便宜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prediction of Energy Consumption by Ships at the port using Deep Learning A Review on future challenges and concerns associated with an Internet of Things based automatic health monitoring system Energy Efficient Data Mining Approach for Estimating the Diabetes Comparative Analysis of Modelling for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Solutions SDN Controller and Blockchain to Secure Information Transaction in a Cluster Structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1