Association Between Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Korean Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Findings From KNOW‐CKD

C. Park, Hyungwoo Kim, Y. S. Joo, J. Park, T. Chang, T. Yoo, S. Park, D. Chae, W. Chung, Yong‐Soo Kim, K. Oh, Shin-Wook Kang, S. Han
{"title":"Association Between Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Korean Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Findings From KNOW‐CKD","authors":"C. Park, Hyungwoo Kim, Y. S. Joo, J. Park, T. Chang, T. Yoo, S. Park, D. Chae, W. Chung, Yong‐Soo Kim, K. Oh, Shin-Wook Kang, S. Han","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.122.025513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Whether visit‐to‐visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability can predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chronic kidney disease is unclear. Methods and Results We investigated the relationship between SDs of visit‐to‐visit SBP variability during the first year of enrollment and MACE among 1575 participants from KNOW‐CKD (Korean Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease). Participants were categorized into 3 groups according to tertiles of visit‐to‐visit SBP variability (SD). The study end point was MACE, defined as a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiac death. During 6748 patient‐years of follow‐up (median, 4.2 years), MACE occurred in 64 participants (4.1%). Compared with the lowest tertile of visit‐to‐visit SBP variability (SD), the hazard ratios (HRs) for the middle and the highest tertile were 1.64 (95% CI, 0.80–3.36) and 2.23 (95% CI, 1.12–4.44), respectively, in a multivariable cause‐specific hazard model. In addition, the HR associated with each 5‐mm Hg increase in visit‐to‐visit SBP variability (SD) was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.01–1.45). This association was consistent in sensitivity analyses with 2 additional definitions of SBP variability determined by the coefficient of variation and variation independent of the mean. The corresponding HRs for the middle and highest tertiles were 2.11 (95% CI, 1.03–4.35) and 2.28 (95% CI, 1.12–4.63), respectively, in the analysis with the coefficient of variation and 1.76 (95% CI, 0.87–3.57) and 2.04 (95% CI, 1.03–4.03), respectively, with the variation independent of the mean. Conclusions Higher visit‐to‐visit SBP variability is associated with an increased risk of MACE in patients with chronic kidney disease. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01630486.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background Whether visit‐to‐visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability can predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chronic kidney disease is unclear. Methods and Results We investigated the relationship between SDs of visit‐to‐visit SBP variability during the first year of enrollment and MACE among 1575 participants from KNOW‐CKD (Korean Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease). Participants were categorized into 3 groups according to tertiles of visit‐to‐visit SBP variability (SD). The study end point was MACE, defined as a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiac death. During 6748 patient‐years of follow‐up (median, 4.2 years), MACE occurred in 64 participants (4.1%). Compared with the lowest tertile of visit‐to‐visit SBP variability (SD), the hazard ratios (HRs) for the middle and the highest tertile were 1.64 (95% CI, 0.80–3.36) and 2.23 (95% CI, 1.12–4.44), respectively, in a multivariable cause‐specific hazard model. In addition, the HR associated with each 5‐mm Hg increase in visit‐to‐visit SBP variability (SD) was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.01–1.45). This association was consistent in sensitivity analyses with 2 additional definitions of SBP variability determined by the coefficient of variation and variation independent of the mean. The corresponding HRs for the middle and highest tertiles were 2.11 (95% CI, 1.03–4.35) and 2.28 (95% CI, 1.12–4.63), respectively, in the analysis with the coefficient of variation and 1.76 (95% CI, 0.87–3.57) and 2.04 (95% CI, 1.03–4.03), respectively, with the variation independent of the mean. Conclusions Higher visit‐to‐visit SBP variability is associated with an increased risk of MACE in patients with chronic kidney disease. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01630486.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国慢性肾病患者收缩压变异性与主要心血管不良事件之间的关系:来自KNOW‐CKD的研究结果
背景收缩压(SBP)变异性是否可以预测慢性肾病患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)尚不清楚。方法和结果我们研究了1575名来自KNOW - CKD(韩国慢性肾脏疾病患者结局队列研究)的参与者在入组第一年访间收缩压变异性的SDs与MACE之间的关系。根据访间收缩压变异性(SD)的位数将参与者分为3组。研究终点为MACE,定义为非致死性心肌梗死、不稳定性心绞痛、血运重建术、非致死性中风、心力衰竭住院或心源性死亡的复合。在6748患者年的随访期间(中位4.2年),64名参与者(4.1%)发生了MACE。在多变量原因特异性风险模型中,与最低分位数的访间收压变异性(SD)相比,中分位数和最高分位数的风险比(hr)分别为1.64 (95% CI, 0.80-3.36)和2.23 (95% CI, 1.12-4.44)。此外,每次来访收缩压变异性(SD)每增加5毫米汞柱,相关的HR为1.21 (95% CI, 1.01-1.45)。这种关联在敏感性分析中是一致的,另外两种定义的收缩压变异性由变异系数和独立于平均值的变异决定。在变异系数分析中,中位数和最高位数对应的hr分别为2.11 (95% CI, 1.03-4.35)和2.28 (95% CI, 1.12-4.63),分别为1.76 (95% CI, 0.87-3.57)和2.04 (95% CI, 1.03-4.03),变异与平均值无关。结论:在慢性肾脏疾病患者中,较高的访间收缩压变异性与MACE风险增加相关。注册网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01630486。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Survival in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Active Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study Treatment of Slow‐Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow‐Mediated Hyperemia: The Randomized RAIN‐FLOW Study Predicting Arterial Thrombotic Events Following Peripheral Revascularization Using Objective Viscoelastic Data Safety of Catheter Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Amyloidosis Corin Missense Variants, Blood Pressure, and Hypertension in 11 322 Black Individuals: Insights From REGARDS and the Jackson Heart Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1