Stuck on the wrong track: 20 years of euro disillusion, denial, and delusion

Joerg Bibow
{"title":"Stuck on the wrong track: 20 years of euro disillusion, denial, and delusion","authors":"Joerg Bibow","doi":"10.4337/ejeep.2020.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution assesses the functioning of Europe's Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) during the first 20 years of the euro's existence. It argues that two formative intellectual currents converged at Maastricht to shape the design and reception of the euro regime: ordoliberalism and neoliberalism. Germany's ordoliberalism inspired and shaped the euro regime design. Neoliberalism fashioned the reception of what was agreed at Maastricht under the influence of Bundesbank dogma and power. As a product of the zeitgeist, Europe got stuck with a deeply flawed euro regime. The Maastricht Treaty institutionalized an asymmetric (growth-unfriendly) policy regime. This suited the macroeconomic mainstream well, fighting the ‘1970s stagflation war’ for the past 40 years. Twenty years of euro disillusion have produced the exact opposite: ‘stagdeflation.’","PeriodicalId":44368,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies-Intervention","volume":"14 1","pages":"139-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies-Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2020.0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This contribution assesses the functioning of Europe's Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) during the first 20 years of the euro's existence. It argues that two formative intellectual currents converged at Maastricht to shape the design and reception of the euro regime: ordoliberalism and neoliberalism. Germany's ordoliberalism inspired and shaped the euro regime design. Neoliberalism fashioned the reception of what was agreed at Maastricht under the influence of Bundesbank dogma and power. As a product of the zeitgeist, Europe got stuck with a deeply flawed euro regime. The Maastricht Treaty institutionalized an asymmetric (growth-unfriendly) policy regime. This suited the macroeconomic mainstream well, fighting the ‘1970s stagflation war’ for the past 40 years. Twenty years of euro disillusion have produced the exact opposite: ‘stagdeflation.’
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
困在错误的轨道上:20年的欧元幻灭、否认和错觉
本贡献评估了欧洲经济和货币联盟(EMU)在欧元存在的前20年的运作。它认为,两股形成性的思想潮流在马斯特里赫特汇聚一堂,塑造了欧元制度的设计和接受:世界自由主义和新自由主义。德国的自由主义启发并塑造了欧元制度的设计。在德国央行教条和权力的影响下,新自由主义塑造了对马斯特里赫特协议的接受。作为时代思潮的产物,欧洲陷入了一个存在严重缺陷的欧元体制。《马斯特里赫特条约》将不对称(不利于增长)的政策体制制度化。这很符合宏观经济的主流,在过去40年里一直在打“上世纪70年代的滞胀战争”。20年来欧元的幻灭产生了完全相反的结果:“滞缩”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention (EJEEP) is a peer-reviewed journal which serves as a forum for studies in macroeconomic theory, economic institutions and economic policies. The managing editors aim for productive debates involving one or more variants of heterodox economics, and invite contributions acknowledging the pluralism of research approaches. The submission of both theoretical and empirical work is encouraged. The managing editors contend that a wide variety of institutional and social factors shape economic life and economic processes. Only a careful study and integration of such factors into economics will lead to theoretical progress and to competent economic policy recommendations. This was clearly demonstrated by the inadequacy of orthodox economics, based on neoclassical foundations, to provide suitable explanations and responses to recent financial and economic crises.
期刊最新文献
It takes two to tango: a reply to our MMT critics* 'I think it is important to speak multiple languages theoretically in order to communicate to different types of people' Book review: Cuyvers, Ludo (2022): Neo-Marxism and Post-Keynesian Economics: From Kalecki to Sraffa and Joan Robinson, Milton Park (247 pages, Routledge, hardcover, ISBN 978-1-032-25480-7) Editorial to the Symposium: Modern Monetary Theory and its critics The trade-off between inflation and unemployment in an ‘MMT world’: an open-economy perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1