Short Non-Malleable Codes from Related-Key Secure Block Ciphers, Revisited

IF 1.7 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology Pub Date : 2022-09-09 DOI:10.46586/tosc.v2022.i3.1-19
G. Brian, Antonio Faonio, João L. Ribeiro, D. Venturi
{"title":"Short Non-Malleable Codes from Related-Key Secure Block Ciphers, Revisited","authors":"G. Brian, Antonio Faonio, João L. Ribeiro, D. Venturi","doi":"10.46586/tosc.v2022.i3.1-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We construct non-malleable codes in the split-state model with codeword length m + 3λ or m + 5λ, where m is the message size and λ is the security parameter, depending on how conservative one is. Our scheme is very simple and involves a single call to a block cipher meeting a new security notion which we dub entropic fixed-related-key security, which essentially means that the block cipher behaves like a pseudorandom permutation when queried upon inputs sampled from a distribution with sufficient min-entropy, even under related-key attacks with respect to an arbitrary but fixed key relation. Importantly, indistinguishability only holds with respect to the original secret key (and not with respect to the tampered secret key).In a previous work, Fehr, Karpman, and Mennink (ToSC 2018) used a related assumption (where the block cipher inputs can be chosen by the adversary, and where indistinguishability holds even with respect to the tampered key) to construct a nonmalleable code in the split-state model with codeword length m + 2λ. Unfortunately, no block cipher (even an ideal one) satisfies their assumption when the tampering function is allowed to be cipher-dependent. In contrast, we are able to show that entropic fixed-related-key security holds in the ideal cipher model with respect to a large class of cipher-dependent tampering attacks (including those which break the assumption of Fehr, Karpman, and Mennink).","PeriodicalId":37077,"journal":{"name":"IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/tosc.v2022.i3.1-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We construct non-malleable codes in the split-state model with codeword length m + 3λ or m + 5λ, where m is the message size and λ is the security parameter, depending on how conservative one is. Our scheme is very simple and involves a single call to a block cipher meeting a new security notion which we dub entropic fixed-related-key security, which essentially means that the block cipher behaves like a pseudorandom permutation when queried upon inputs sampled from a distribution with sufficient min-entropy, even under related-key attacks with respect to an arbitrary but fixed key relation. Importantly, indistinguishability only holds with respect to the original secret key (and not with respect to the tampered secret key).In a previous work, Fehr, Karpman, and Mennink (ToSC 2018) used a related assumption (where the block cipher inputs can be chosen by the adversary, and where indistinguishability holds even with respect to the tampered key) to construct a nonmalleable code in the split-state model with codeword length m + 2λ. Unfortunately, no block cipher (even an ideal one) satisfies their assumption when the tampering function is allowed to be cipher-dependent. In contrast, we are able to show that entropic fixed-related-key security holds in the ideal cipher model with respect to a large class of cipher-dependent tampering attacks (including those which break the assumption of Fehr, Karpman, and Mennink).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自相关密钥安全分组密码的短不可延展性代码,再访
我们在分裂状态模型中构造了码字长度为m + 3λ或m + 5λ的不可延展性码,其中m为消息大小,λ为安全参数,具体取决于消息的保守程度。我们的方案非常简单,涉及到对分组密码的一次调用,满足我们称之为熵固定相关密钥安全的新安全概念,这本质上意味着当从具有足够最小熵的分布中采样输入时查询分组密码时,即使在针对任意但固定的密钥关系的相关密钥攻击下,分组密码的行为也像伪随机排列。重要的是,不可区分性只适用于原始密钥(而不适用于被篡改的密钥)。在之前的工作中,Fehr, Karpman和Mennink (ToSC 2018)使用了一个相关的假设(其中分组密码输入可以由攻击者选择,并且即使对于被篡改的密钥也具有不可区分性)在码字长度为m + 2λ的分裂状态模型中构建不可延展性代码。不幸的是,当允许篡改函数与密码相关时,没有分组密码(即使是理想的分组密码)满足他们的假设。相反,我们能够证明熵固定相关密钥安全性在理想密码模型中适用于大量依赖于密码的篡改攻击(包括那些打破Fehr, Karpman和Mennink假设的攻击)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
22.90%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
On Large Tweaks in Tweakable Even-Mansour with Linear Tweak and Key Mixing Revisiting Yoyo Tricks on AES Key Committing Security of AEZ and More Related-Key Differential Analysis of the AES Propagation of Subspaces in Primitives with Monomial Sboxes: Applications to Rescue and Variants of the AES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1