SULFATE REMOVAL IN BIOCHEMICAL REACTORS AND SCRUBBERS TREATING NEUTRAL LOW-METAL CONCENTRATION MIW

G. Fattore, J. Gusek, T. R. Clark, L. Josselyn
{"title":"SULFATE REMOVAL IN BIOCHEMICAL REACTORS AND SCRUBBERS TREATING NEUTRAL LOW-METAL CONCENTRATION MIW","authors":"G. Fattore, J. Gusek, T. R. Clark, L. Josselyn","doi":"10.21000/JASMR17020001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Sulfate and metals are commonly found in mining influenced water (MIW). A biochemical reactor (BCR) is an established technology that can remove sulfate and metals. Three organic mixtures were bench-tested for approximately six months to decrease sulfate concentration in a circum-neutral pH MIW containing low metal concentrations. Organic materials included wood pellets, oat straw, biochar, and manure as an inoculum. These were blended with limestonedolomite sand. Additionally, sulfide polishing units (SPUs), which were charged with native soil from the site, zero valent iron (ZVI), or magnetite, were evaluated for removal of dissolved sulfide discharged from each of the BCRs. Median MIW influent contained about 3000 mg/L of sulfate and very low concentrations of metals. The flow rates varied from 144 to 1,231 mL/day. Among all the BCRs tested, the hydraulic retention times varied from 5 to 75 days. All BCRs demonstrated similar removal rates of about 1.3 (BCR 1), 1.4 (BCR 2), and 1.6 (BCR 3) mol SO4 /m-day during the last week of testing. While the SPUs removed dissolved sulfide from the BCR effluents as expected, they removed sulfate as well. Dissolved organic carbon in the BCR effluents promoted sulfatereducing microbial activity in the SPUs where the inorganic materials functioned as a solid support for the microbial community. The magnetite was not an effective medium for post-BCR sulfate removal. Sulfate removal efficiencies in the BCRs were 55% (BCR 1), 57% (BCR 2), and 67% (BCR 3) during the final week of the bench-scale testing. Sulfate removal in the SPUs (from the BCRs effluents) was 35% and 37%, for SPU 1 and SPU 2, respectively. Novel reactor charging configurations in single units may therefore be much more effective and efficient than approaches exclusively using lignocellulosic or inert supports. Sulfate reducing microbial populations were still increasing when the test was concluded.","PeriodicalId":17230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","volume":"58 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR17020001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Sulfate and metals are commonly found in mining influenced water (MIW). A biochemical reactor (BCR) is an established technology that can remove sulfate and metals. Three organic mixtures were bench-tested for approximately six months to decrease sulfate concentration in a circum-neutral pH MIW containing low metal concentrations. Organic materials included wood pellets, oat straw, biochar, and manure as an inoculum. These were blended with limestonedolomite sand. Additionally, sulfide polishing units (SPUs), which were charged with native soil from the site, zero valent iron (ZVI), or magnetite, were evaluated for removal of dissolved sulfide discharged from each of the BCRs. Median MIW influent contained about 3000 mg/L of sulfate and very low concentrations of metals. The flow rates varied from 144 to 1,231 mL/day. Among all the BCRs tested, the hydraulic retention times varied from 5 to 75 days. All BCRs demonstrated similar removal rates of about 1.3 (BCR 1), 1.4 (BCR 2), and 1.6 (BCR 3) mol SO4 /m-day during the last week of testing. While the SPUs removed dissolved sulfide from the BCR effluents as expected, they removed sulfate as well. Dissolved organic carbon in the BCR effluents promoted sulfatereducing microbial activity in the SPUs where the inorganic materials functioned as a solid support for the microbial community. The magnetite was not an effective medium for post-BCR sulfate removal. Sulfate removal efficiencies in the BCRs were 55% (BCR 1), 57% (BCR 2), and 67% (BCR 3) during the final week of the bench-scale testing. Sulfate removal in the SPUs (from the BCRs effluents) was 35% and 37%, for SPU 1 and SPU 2, respectively. Novel reactor charging configurations in single units may therefore be much more effective and efficient than approaches exclusively using lignocellulosic or inert supports. Sulfate reducing microbial populations were still increasing when the test was concluded.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生化反应器和洗涤塔处理中性低金属浓度废水中的硫酸盐去除
摘要硫酸盐和金属通常存在于采矿影响水中。生物化学反应器(BCR)是一种成熟的去除硫酸盐和金属的技术。在含有低金属浓度的环中性pH MIW中,对三种有机混合物进行了大约六个月的台架测试,以降低硫酸盐浓度。有机材料包括木屑颗粒、燕麦秸秆、生物炭和粪便作为接种物。这些都与石灰石白云石砂混合。此外,硫化物抛光单元(spu),由现场的原生土壤,零价铁(ZVI)或磁铁矿充电,用于去除每个bcr排放的溶解硫化物。中等浓度的水含有约3000毫克/升的硫酸盐和极低浓度的金属。流速从144 ~ 1231 mL/天不等。在所有测试的bcr中,水力滞留时间从5天到75天不等。在最后一周的测试中,所有BCR的去除率相似,分别为1.3 (BCR 1)、1.4 (BCR 2)和1.6 (BCR 3) mol /m-day。spu除除BCR废水中溶解的硫化物的同时,也除除了硫酸盐。BCR出水中的溶解有机碳促进了spu中硫酸盐还原微生物的活性,其中无机物质为微生物群落提供了坚实的支持。磁铁矿不是bcr后硫酸盐去除的有效介质。在最后一周的实验中,BCR的硫酸盐去除率分别为55% (BCR 1)、57% (BCR 2)和67% (BCR 3)。SPU 1和SPU 2的硫酸盐去除率分别为35%和37%(来自bcr出水)。因此,在单个单元中,新型的反应器充注配置可能比完全使用木质纤维素或惰性载体的方法更有效和高效。试验结束时,硫酸盐还原菌群仍在增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System to Evaluate Prime Farmland Reclamation Success Based on Spatial Soil Properties PENNSYLVANIA’S ABANDONED MINE LAND (AML) EMERGENCY PROGRAM THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEEPAGE ANALYSIS OF A COAL REFUSE PILE RECLAMATION PENNSYLVANIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL GOOD SAMARITAN PROGRAM DIMENSIONS IN POST-INDUSTRIAL LAND TRANSFORMATION IN PLANNING AND DESIGN: A PORTUGESE CASE STUDY CONCERNING PUBLIC PERCEPTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1