A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Evaluate the Intranasal Human Abuse Potential and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Extended-Release Abuse-Deterrent Formulation of Oxycodone.

IF 0.3 1区 历史学 0 CLASSICS AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2016-06-01 Epub Date: 2015-12-14 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnv020
Lynn R Webster, Ernest A Kopecky, Michael D Smith, Alison B Fleming
{"title":"A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study to Evaluate the Intranasal Human Abuse Potential and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Extended-Release Abuse-Deterrent Formulation of Oxycodone.","authors":"Lynn R Webster, Ernest A Kopecky, Michael D Smith, Alison B Fleming","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnv020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the human abuse potential (HAP) of an experimental, microsphere-in-capsule formulation of extended-release oxycodone (oxycodone DETERx®) (herein \"DETERx\").</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive- and placebo-controlled, single-dose, four-phase, four-treatment, crossover study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical research site.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>There were 39 qualifying subjects (72% male, 85% white, mean age of 27 years) with 36 completing all four Double-blind Treatment Periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The four phases encompassed: 1) Screening; 2) Drug Discrimination; 3) Double-blind Treatment; and 4) Follow-up. Drug Discrimination tests ensured that subjects could distinguish placebo from opioid. The four Double-blind Treatments compared DETERx-administered as either a crushed intranasal (IN) or an intact oral (PO) preparation-with immediate-release oxycodone IN (OXY-IR IN) and with an intact IN and PO placebo DETERx control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For primary pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments, abuse quotient (Cmax/Tmax) was lower with DETERx IN than DETERx PO; both treatments were substantially lower than OXY-IR IN (6.24, 8.60, and 69.6 ng/mL/h, respectively). For drug liking, the primary subjective pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint, both DETERx IN and DETERx PO produced significantly lower scores than OXY-IR IN (P ≤ 0.0001 for each); DETERx IN was less liked than DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.05), mirroring the PK relationships. Objectively assessed pupillometry corroborated the more rapid and significantly greater effect of OXY-IR IN than either DETERx IN or DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.007 for each). Overall safety profiles of DETERx and OXY-IR were comparable and both were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes suggest that DETERx IN has relatively low HAP; continued research in larger populations is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":46128,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","volume":"88 1","pages":"1112-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4894244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the human abuse potential (HAP) of an experimental, microsphere-in-capsule formulation of extended-release oxycodone (oxycodone DETERx®) (herein "DETERx").

Design: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive- and placebo-controlled, single-dose, four-phase, four-treatment, crossover study.

Setting: Clinical research site.

Subjects: There were 39 qualifying subjects (72% male, 85% white, mean age of 27 years) with 36 completing all four Double-blind Treatment Periods.

Methods: The four phases encompassed: 1) Screening; 2) Drug Discrimination; 3) Double-blind Treatment; and 4) Follow-up. Drug Discrimination tests ensured that subjects could distinguish placebo from opioid. The four Double-blind Treatments compared DETERx-administered as either a crushed intranasal (IN) or an intact oral (PO) preparation-with immediate-release oxycodone IN (OXY-IR IN) and with an intact IN and PO placebo DETERx control.

Results: For primary pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments, abuse quotient (Cmax/Tmax) was lower with DETERx IN than DETERx PO; both treatments were substantially lower than OXY-IR IN (6.24, 8.60, and 69.6 ng/mL/h, respectively). For drug liking, the primary subjective pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint, both DETERx IN and DETERx PO produced significantly lower scores than OXY-IR IN (P ≤ 0.0001 for each); DETERx IN was less liked than DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.05), mirroring the PK relationships. Objectively assessed pupillometry corroborated the more rapid and significantly greater effect of OXY-IR IN than either DETERx IN or DETERx PO (P ≤ 0.007 for each). Overall safety profiles of DETERx and OXY-IR were comparable and both were well tolerated.

Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes suggest that DETERx IN has relatively low HAP; continued research in larger populations is suggested.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机、双盲、双哑剂研究,旨在评估新型缓释阻断滥用制剂羟考酮的鼻内人体滥用潜力和药代动力学。
目的:评估缓释羟考酮(羟考酮 DETERx®)(以下简称 "DETERx")实验性微球胶囊制剂的人体滥用潜力(HAP):随机、双盲、双假、阳性和安慰剂对照、单剂量、四阶段、四疗程、交叉研究:受试者共有 39 名合格受试者(72% 为男性,85% 为白人,平均年龄为 27 岁),其中 36 人完成了全部四个双盲治疗期:四个阶段包括1)筛选;2)药物辨别;3)双盲治疗;4)随访。药物鉴别测试确保受试者能够区分安慰剂和阿片类药物。四次双盲治疗将 DETERx(以压碎的鼻内(IN)或完整的口服(PO)制剂给药)与速释羟考酮 IN(OXY-IR IN)以及完整的 IN 和口服安慰剂 DETERx 对照组进行了比较:在主要药代动力学(PK)评估中,DETERx IN 的滥用商数(Cmax/Tmax)低于 DETERx PO;两种疗法的滥用商数(Cmax/Tmax)均大大低于 OXY-IR IN(分别为 6.24、8.60 和 69.6 纳克/毫升/小时)。在药物喜欢度(主要的主观药效学终点)方面,DETERx IN 和 DETERx PO 的得分均显著低于 OXY-IR IN(各 P ≤ 0.0001);DETERx IN 的喜欢度低于 DETERx PO(P ≤ 0.05),反映了 PK 关系。客观评估的瞳孔测量法证实,OXY-IR IN 比 DETERx IN 或 DETERx PO 的作用更迅速且明显更大(P 均≤ 0.007)。DETERx 和 OXY-IR 的总体安全性相当,耐受性良好:结论:药代动力学和药效学结果表明,DETERx IN 的 HAP 相对较低;建议继续在更大的人群中进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Founded in 1880, American Journal of Philology (AJP) has helped to shape American classical scholarship. Today, the Journal has achieved worldwide recognition as a forum for international exchange among classicists and philologists by publishing original research in classical literature, philology, linguistics, history, society, religion, philosophy, and cultural and material studies. Book review sections are featured in every issue. AJP is open to a wide variety of contemporary and interdisciplinary approaches, including literary interpretation and theory, historical investigation, and textual criticism.
期刊最新文献
The Body of the Meretrix and the Sexualization of Simo's House in Plautus' Mostellaria Alogos Aesthesis and the Sense of Taste Scribere Iussit Amor: Phaedra, Love, and (Roman) Law in Ovid's Heroides 4 The Exemplarity of Marcellus in Punica 14 Nice Guys Finish First: Xenophon on Exhortations and Their Limits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1