Lessons learned from principal investigators on recruitment for community-based health behavior studies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW University of Toronto Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-26 DOI:10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20232199
Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler, Margaret Demment, Sara C Folta, Meredith Graham, Jay E Maddock, Megan S Patterson
{"title":"Lessons learned from principal investigators on recruitment for community-based health behavior studies during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler, Margaret Demment, Sara C Folta, Meredith Graham, Jay E Maddock, Megan S Patterson","doi":"10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20232199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about pandemic-related impacts on participant recruitment into community-based health studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this report was to summarize lessons learned from principal investigators (PIs) of NIH-funded community-based health behavior studies that were scheduled to recruit during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report on findings from three open-ended questions that were part of a 50-question online survey conducted from December 2022 - January 2023, completed by 52 PIs. Four categories of lessons emerged to optimize recruitment into studies: formalize relationships with community partnerships; focus on study operations; recruitment is a science and an art; and reduce participant burden and increase participant benefit. Taken together, these recommendations will require longer and more complex recruitment plans. To implement these plans, researchers and funders will need to allocate more time, thoughtful attention, and financial resources to support formal community partnerships, additional staff time and training, real-time monitoring and refinement of multiple strategies throughout recruitment, and increased attention to participant benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":46289,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Law Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"254-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20232199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about pandemic-related impacts on participant recruitment into community-based health studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this report was to summarize lessons learned from principal investigators (PIs) of NIH-funded community-based health behavior studies that were scheduled to recruit during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report on findings from three open-ended questions that were part of a 50-question online survey conducted from December 2022 - January 2023, completed by 52 PIs. Four categories of lessons emerged to optimize recruitment into studies: formalize relationships with community partnerships; focus on study operations; recruitment is a science and an art; and reduce participant burden and increase participant benefit. Taken together, these recommendations will require longer and more complex recruitment plans. To implement these plans, researchers and funders will need to allocate more time, thoughtful attention, and financial resources to support formal community partnerships, additional staff time and training, real-time monitoring and refinement of multiple strategies throughout recruitment, and increased attention to participant benefit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主要研究人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间为基于社区的健康行为研究招募人员的经验教训。
人们对 COVID-19 大流行期间大流行对社区健康研究参与者招募的影响知之甚少。本报告旨在总结由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助、计划在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行招募的社区健康行为研究的主要研究者(PIs)的经验教训。我们报告的是 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 1 月期间进行的 50 题在线调查中三个开放式问题的结果,该调查由 52 位首席研究员完成。我们总结了四类优化研究招募的经验:与社区合作伙伴建立正式关系;关注研究运作;招募是一门科学,也是一门艺术;减轻参与者负担,增加参与者收益。综合来看,这些建议需要更长、更复杂的招募计划。为了实施这些计划,研究人员和资助者需要分配更多的时间、周到的关注和财政资源,以支持正式的社区合作关系、额外的员工时间和培训、实时监控和完善整个招募过程中的多种策略,并更加关注参与者的收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Joseph Heath, The Machinery of Government Ableism’s New Clothes: Achievements and Challenges for Disability Rights in Canada A Person Suffering: On Danger and Care in Mental Health Law Interpreting Dicey Against Moralism in Anti-Discrimination Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1