Coping with an EU and Domestic Crisis: Ireland’s Approach to Brexit

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Contemporary European Studies Pub Date : 2022-11-09 DOI:10.1080/14782804.2022.2141210
M. Murphy
{"title":"Coping with an EU and Domestic Crisis: Ireland’s Approach to Brexit","authors":"M. Murphy","doi":"10.1080/14782804.2022.2141210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Following the UK decision to leave the EU (European Union), Ireland was confronted with profound political and economic challenges linked to its relationship with both the EU and the UK. With a view to protecting Irish interests, the Irish government pursued determined efforts to ‘seek shelter’ from the EU and to develop a ‘hedging’ strategy. In contrast, Irish national authorities faced a decidedly more difficult challenge in balancing different logics of action vis-à-vis the EU, to which Ireland remains committed, and the UK, which continues to be an economically and politically important neighbour for Ireland. Largely successful EU-focused coping strategies co-existed alongside a less positive effort at maintaining a cordial and constructive British-Irish bilateral relationship. The sum of Ireland’s coping strategies, however, unleashed a series of Europeanisation dynamics which reflect a shift in the nature of Ireland’s traditional relationship with the EU. Brexit has stimulated and motivated a greater propensity to upload Irish preferences, including in relation to the EU’s foreign policy landscape.","PeriodicalId":46035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"590 - 602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2141210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Following the UK decision to leave the EU (European Union), Ireland was confronted with profound political and economic challenges linked to its relationship with both the EU and the UK. With a view to protecting Irish interests, the Irish government pursued determined efforts to ‘seek shelter’ from the EU and to develop a ‘hedging’ strategy. In contrast, Irish national authorities faced a decidedly more difficult challenge in balancing different logics of action vis-à-vis the EU, to which Ireland remains committed, and the UK, which continues to be an economically and politically important neighbour for Ireland. Largely successful EU-focused coping strategies co-existed alongside a less positive effort at maintaining a cordial and constructive British-Irish bilateral relationship. The sum of Ireland’s coping strategies, however, unleashed a series of Europeanisation dynamics which reflect a shift in the nature of Ireland’s traditional relationship with the EU. Brexit has stimulated and motivated a greater propensity to upload Irish preferences, including in relation to the EU’s foreign policy landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对欧盟和国内危机:爱尔兰对英国脱欧的态度
在英国决定离开欧盟(欧盟)之后,爱尔兰面临着与欧盟和英国关系相关的深刻政治和经济挑战。为了保护爱尔兰的利益,爱尔兰政府做出了坚定的努力,从欧盟“寻求庇护”,并制定了“对冲”战略。相比之下,爱尔兰国家当局在平衡不同的行动逻辑方面面临着明显更困难的挑战,一方面是爱尔兰仍然承诺加入的欧盟,另一方面是英国,后者在经济和政治上仍然是爱尔兰重要的邻国。以欧盟为中心的应对策略在很大程度上取得了成功,与此同时,英国与爱尔兰在维持友好和建设性双边关系方面的努力却不那么积极。然而,爱尔兰应对策略的总和释放了一系列欧洲化的动力,反映了爱尔兰与欧盟传统关系本质的转变。英国脱欧刺激并推动了一种上传爱尔兰偏好的更大倾向,包括与欧盟外交政策格局有关的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary European Studies (previously Journal of European Area Studies) seeks to provide a forum for interdisciplinary debate about the theory and practice of area studies as well as for empirical studies of European societies, politics and cultures. The central area focus of the journal is European in its broadest geographical definition. However, the examination of European "areas" and themes are enhanced as a matter of editorial policy by non-European perspectives. The Journal intends to attract the interest of both cross-national and single-country specialists in European studies and to counteract the worst features of Eurocentrism with coverage of non-European views on European themes.
期刊最新文献
Does regulation matter? Trajectories of party organizational change in Western Europe (1970-2010) No school of hard knocks: education policies and ideologies of Slovak far-right parties Change in the baltic sea region: geopolitics, identity, and the Russian negative integration factor (Br)exit citizenship: belonging, rights and participation The rise and fall of the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: ‘open strategic autonomy’ in action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1