Budesonide/formoterol via the Elpenhaler® device in asthmatic patients: A real-world effectiveness study (The BOREAS Study)

IF 0.5 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pneumon Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI:10.18332/pne/144485
P. Bakakos, D. Papakosta, S. Loukides
{"title":"Budesonide/formoterol via the Elpenhaler® device in asthmatic patients: A real-world effectiveness study\n(The BOREAS Study)","authors":"P. Bakakos, D. Papakosta, S. Loukides","doi":"10.18332/pne/144485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Very limited real-world data have been captured in the Greek asthmatic population regarding the effects of treatment with a fixeddose combination of budesonide/formoterol via the Elpenhaler® device, on the course of the disease and its impact on the patients’ quality of life score. METHODS In this multicenter, observational study, 1230 adult asthmatic patients in Greece that had been recently prescribed a fixed-dose combination budesonide/formoterol, Elpenhaler® were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment at six months in symptom control using the 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7). The secondary endpoints included the quality of life score using the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), pulmonary function, patients’ satisfaction with the Elpenhaler® device, and safety. RESULTS In total, 60.3% (742/1230) of the participants were female and the mean age was 51.10±16.98 years. A statistically significant improvement of the mean ACQ-7 score was noted at 3 months (1.01±0.70) and 6 months (0.79±0.66), compared to baseline (2.18±0.91). Similar statistically significant results were noted for the MiniAQLQ score with an improvement from 4.58±1.06 at baseline to 5.95±0.79 at 3 months, and 6.21±0.74 at 6 months. The mean Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 second (FEV1) showed continuing improvement, being 2.36±0.86, 2.58±0.88, and 2.64±0.88 L, at baseline, 3, and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These real-world data showed that the administration of a fixed dose combination of budesonide/formoterol using the Elpenhaler® device was well-tolerated and effective in significantly reducing the symptoms of asthma and improving the quality of life. INTRODUCTION The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with asthma is affected by the presenting symptoms and their limiting effects on their physical, work and social aspects of their everyday life1. Hence, early and effective control of the disease can significantly impact their HRQoL, as assessed through various tools, and, in turn, decrease the use of healthcare resources1,2. When referring to disease control in asthmatic patients, two aspects should be considered, the repression of symptoms and the reduction of the risk for potentially unfavorable outcomes, which include the incidence of exacerbations, persistent effects on lung function, and adverse events emerging from the treatment itself. In prospect, inadequate symptom control usually results in increased exacerbations and overall a negative effect on the quality of life2. Spirometry and, particularly, persistent airway obstruction are additive parameters for predicting future risk2. Self-reported outcomes and physician-assessed tools provide a method for harmonizing and quantifying asthmatic patients’ initial state and changes occurring thereafter. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a 7-item questionnaire that incorporates and evaluates symptoms and the treating guidelines. Certain cut-off scores, ranging from 0.75–1.50 have been proposed to differentiate between ‘well controlled’ and ‘not well controlled’ patients3. Validated translations of the ACQ-7 questionnaire in different languages, including Greek, are available4. The concurrent use of more than one of these assessment tools may not offer practical advantages to the clinician, as the available questionnaires may not exhibit the same correlation to the patient’s symptoms5. The initial evaluation and monitoring of the patient’s quality of life are often overlooked in daily clinical practice, in favor of time conservation and clinical and laboratory examinations. However, in conditions such as asthma, where the disease can produce debilitating symptoms that affect the person’s health perception and their ability for social AFFILIATION 1 1st University Department of Respiratory Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece 2 Pulmonary Clinic, ‘G. Papanikolaou’ General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 3 School of Medicine, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece CORRESPONDENCE TO Stylianos Loukides. School of Medicine, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Street, Athens, 12462, Greece. E-mail: loukstel@med.uoa.gr ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-00024278-9922","PeriodicalId":42353,"journal":{"name":"Pneumon","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/pne/144485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Very limited real-world data have been captured in the Greek asthmatic population regarding the effects of treatment with a fixeddose combination of budesonide/formoterol via the Elpenhaler® device, on the course of the disease and its impact on the patients’ quality of life score. METHODS In this multicenter, observational study, 1230 adult asthmatic patients in Greece that had been recently prescribed a fixed-dose combination budesonide/formoterol, Elpenhaler® were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment at six months in symptom control using the 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7). The secondary endpoints included the quality of life score using the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), pulmonary function, patients’ satisfaction with the Elpenhaler® device, and safety. RESULTS In total, 60.3% (742/1230) of the participants were female and the mean age was 51.10±16.98 years. A statistically significant improvement of the mean ACQ-7 score was noted at 3 months (1.01±0.70) and 6 months (0.79±0.66), compared to baseline (2.18±0.91). Similar statistically significant results were noted for the MiniAQLQ score with an improvement from 4.58±1.06 at baseline to 5.95±0.79 at 3 months, and 6.21±0.74 at 6 months. The mean Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 second (FEV1) showed continuing improvement, being 2.36±0.86, 2.58±0.88, and 2.64±0.88 L, at baseline, 3, and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These real-world data showed that the administration of a fixed dose combination of budesonide/formoterol using the Elpenhaler® device was well-tolerated and effective in significantly reducing the symptoms of asthma and improving the quality of life. INTRODUCTION The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with asthma is affected by the presenting symptoms and their limiting effects on their physical, work and social aspects of their everyday life1. Hence, early and effective control of the disease can significantly impact their HRQoL, as assessed through various tools, and, in turn, decrease the use of healthcare resources1,2. When referring to disease control in asthmatic patients, two aspects should be considered, the repression of symptoms and the reduction of the risk for potentially unfavorable outcomes, which include the incidence of exacerbations, persistent effects on lung function, and adverse events emerging from the treatment itself. In prospect, inadequate symptom control usually results in increased exacerbations and overall a negative effect on the quality of life2. Spirometry and, particularly, persistent airway obstruction are additive parameters for predicting future risk2. Self-reported outcomes and physician-assessed tools provide a method for harmonizing and quantifying asthmatic patients’ initial state and changes occurring thereafter. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a 7-item questionnaire that incorporates and evaluates symptoms and the treating guidelines. Certain cut-off scores, ranging from 0.75–1.50 have been proposed to differentiate between ‘well controlled’ and ‘not well controlled’ patients3. Validated translations of the ACQ-7 questionnaire in different languages, including Greek, are available4. The concurrent use of more than one of these assessment tools may not offer practical advantages to the clinician, as the available questionnaires may not exhibit the same correlation to the patient’s symptoms5. The initial evaluation and monitoring of the patient’s quality of life are often overlooked in daily clinical practice, in favor of time conservation and clinical and laboratory examinations. However, in conditions such as asthma, where the disease can produce debilitating symptoms that affect the person’s health perception and their ability for social AFFILIATION 1 1st University Department of Respiratory Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece 2 Pulmonary Clinic, ‘G. Papanikolaou’ General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 3 School of Medicine, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece CORRESPONDENCE TO Stylianos Loukides. School of Medicine, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Street, Athens, 12462, Greece. E-mail: loukstel@med.uoa.gr ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-00024278-9922
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布地奈德/福莫特罗通过Elpenhaler®装置治疗哮喘患者:一项真实世界的有效性研究(BOREAS研究)
在希腊哮喘人群中,通过Elpenhaler®装置进行布地奈德/福莫特罗固定剂量联合治疗对病程及其对患者生活质量评分的影响的实际数据非常有限。方法:在这项多中心观察性研究中,纳入了1230名希腊成年哮喘患者,这些患者最近服用了布地奈德/福莫特罗、Elpenhaler®的固定剂量联合治疗。主要终点是使用7项哮喘控制问卷(ACQ-7)评估治疗6个月时症状控制的有效性。次要终点包括使用迷你哮喘生活质量问卷(MiniAQLQ)的生活质量评分、肺功能、患者对Elpenhaler®装置的满意度和安全性。结果女性占60.3%(742/1230),平均年龄51.10±16.98岁。ACQ-7平均评分在3个月(1.01±0.70)和6个月(0.79±0.66)较基线(2.18±0.91)有统计学意义的改善。MiniAQLQ评分从基线时的4.58±1.06提高到3个月时的5.95±0.79,6个月时的6.21±0.74。平均1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)持续改善,基线、3个月和6个月分别为2.36±0.86、2.58±0.88和2.64±0.88 L。结论:这些真实数据表明,使用Elpenhaler®装置给药布地奈德/福莫特罗的固定剂量组合具有良好的耐受性,并且在显著减轻哮喘症状和改善生活质量方面有效。哮喘患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)受其表现症状及其对其日常生活的身体、工作和社会方面的限制性影响1。因此,通过各种工具评估,疾病的早期和有效控制可以显著影响他们的HRQoL,并反过来减少医疗资源的使用1,2。当涉及到哮喘患者的疾病控制时,应该考虑两个方面,抑制症状和降低潜在不良后果的风险,包括恶化的发生率、对肺功能的持续影响以及治疗本身产生的不良事件。展望未来,症状控制不足通常会导致病情加重,总体上对生活质量产生负面影响2。肺活量测定,特别是持续性气道阻塞是预测未来风险的附加参数2。自我报告的结果和医生评估的工具为哮喘患者的初始状态和此后发生的变化提供了一种协调和量化的方法。哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)是一份包含7个项目的问卷,包含并评估症状和治疗指南。已经提出了一定的临界值,范围在0.75-1.50之间,以区分“控制良好”和“控制不良”的患者3。ACQ-7问卷有不同语言(包括希腊语)的经过验证的译本。同时使用一种以上的评估工具可能不会给临床医生带来实际的好处,因为现有的问卷可能不会显示出与患者症状相同的相关性。在日常临床实践中,为了节省时间和进行临床和实验室检查,往往忽略了对患者生活质量的初步评估和监测。然而,在哮喘等疾病中,这种疾病会产生使人衰弱的症状,影响人的健康感知和社会交往能力1雅典国立和卡波迪斯特里安大学第一大学呼吸医学系,希腊雅典2肺科诊所,G。希腊塞萨洛尼基亚里士多德大学Papanikolaou总医院;希腊雅典国立和卡波迪斯特里安大学' Attikon '大学总医院医学院;雅典国立和Kapodistrian大学“Attikon”大学总医院医学院,希腊雅典里米尼街1号,12462。电子邮件:loukstel@med.uoa.gr或ID: https://orcid.org/0000-00024278-9922
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumon
Pneumon RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Tuberculosis of the temporomandibular joint: a rare case report and review of the literature Determinants of tobacco use patterns and predictors of quit among older women in India: Findings from the study on global aging and adult health Long-term efficacy of different doses of steroid in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study Bronchial atresia mimicking Swyer–James syndrome Right atrial strain during prone ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1