Hygienic evaluation of the most common methods of agricultural crops treatment with chemical protection products (literature review)

А. Borysenko, А. Antonenko, B. Shpak, S. Omelchuk, V. Bardov
{"title":"Hygienic evaluation of the most common methods of agricultural crops treatment with chemical protection products (literature review)","authors":"А. Borysenko, А. Antonenko, B. Shpak, S. Omelchuk, V. Bardov","doi":"10.26641/2307-0404.2021.3.241913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global strategies, including application of chemical plant protection products, are important in the cultivation of safe corps and preservation of human health. A promising area of preventive medicine, agronomy, agroecology and agroengineering is the optimization of methods of pesticide formulations application. The aim of the work was a hygienic assessment of the most common and latest methods of crops treatment with chemical pesticides. Results. The biological effectiveness of different types of pesticides is achieved by different application rates of the working solution. The most common method of pesticide application is spraying, which ensures the application of pesticides in the drop-liquid state and is characterized by low consumption of active substance per unit area, variable-controlled distribution on the treatment surface, provides good adhesion and retention on facilities, allows the use of combined formulations. One of the most effective ways to minimize the negative impact of chemical plant protection products and achieve economic success is a rational approach to the choice of pesticide application, as it takes into account the hazard class of pesticides, the presence of water protection zones, the sensitivity of target crops, etc. Conclusion. Rational application of pesticides includes minimizing the overall effect of pesticides on human health and the environment and achieving high-targeted biological efficiency. Adherence to the methodology of choosing the type of pesticide application and selection of the type of spray is a key point in optimizing the rational use of chemical plant protection products, which requires a detailed study from the standpoint of both efficiency and safety. Control over compliance with the recommendations should be included in sanitary-hygienic and sanitary-ecological monitoring.","PeriodicalId":18652,"journal":{"name":"Medicni perspektivi (Medical perspectives)","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicni perspektivi (Medical perspectives)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2021.3.241913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Global strategies, including application of chemical plant protection products, are important in the cultivation of safe corps and preservation of human health. A promising area of preventive medicine, agronomy, agroecology and agroengineering is the optimization of methods of pesticide formulations application. The aim of the work was a hygienic assessment of the most common and latest methods of crops treatment with chemical pesticides. Results. The biological effectiveness of different types of pesticides is achieved by different application rates of the working solution. The most common method of pesticide application is spraying, which ensures the application of pesticides in the drop-liquid state and is characterized by low consumption of active substance per unit area, variable-controlled distribution on the treatment surface, provides good adhesion and retention on facilities, allows the use of combined formulations. One of the most effective ways to minimize the negative impact of chemical plant protection products and achieve economic success is a rational approach to the choice of pesticide application, as it takes into account the hazard class of pesticides, the presence of water protection zones, the sensitivity of target crops, etc. Conclusion. Rational application of pesticides includes minimizing the overall effect of pesticides on human health and the environment and achieving high-targeted biological efficiency. Adherence to the methodology of choosing the type of pesticide application and selection of the type of spray is a key point in optimizing the rational use of chemical plant protection products, which requires a detailed study from the standpoint of both efficiency and safety. Control over compliance with the recommendations should be included in sanitary-hygienic and sanitary-ecological monitoring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常用农药作物处理方法的卫生评价(文献综述)
全球战略,包括化学植物保护产品的应用,在培育安全军团和维护人类健康方面是重要的。预防医学、农学、农业生态学和农业工程的一个有前途的领域是农药配方应用方法的优化。这项工作的目的是对最常见和最新的化学农药作物处理方法进行卫生评估。结果。不同类型农药的生物有效性是通过工作溶液的不同施用量来实现的。最常用的农药施用方法是喷洒,它保证了农药在滴液状态下的施用,具有单位面积活性物质消耗低,在处理表面分布可变控制,对设施具有良好的附着力和保持性,允许使用组合制剂的特点。将化学植保产品的负面影响降到最低并取得经济成功的最有效方法之一是合理选择农药的施用,因为它要考虑到农药的危害类别、水保护区的存在、目标作物的敏感性等。结论。合理使用农药包括尽量减少农药对人类健康和环境的总体影响,实现高针对性的生物效率。坚持选择农药施用类型和选择喷雾类型的方法是优化合理使用化学植保产品的关键,这需要从效率和安全的角度进行详细的研究。在卫生-卫生和卫生-生态监测中应包括对各项建议遵守情况的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The prognostic value of diagnostic tools in patients with seropositive myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study of 31 cases Аutosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A: two cases in Ukraine with different age of onset Histological and histochemical assessment of short-term events in peri-implant bone for osteoinductivity evaluation of functional-protective implant coatings Prevalence of premature birth in conditions of global warming Electromyographic features of the perineum and pelvic floor in patients with an artificial bladder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1